ON
← Back to feed
'Wrestlers Will Tell About Their Pain, I Am Happy': BJP's Brij Bhushan To NDTV
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive3 days ago

'Wrestlers Will Tell About Their Pain, I Am Happy': BJP's Brij Bhushan To NDTV

The article discusses a controversy involving BJP leader Brij Bhushan and Indian wrestlers who protested against him in January 2023. The wrestlers, including Olympic medalists Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Bajrang Punia, accused Brij Bhushan of sexual exploitation and intimidation during their protest at Jantar Mantar. The incident highlights allegations of misconduct by a prominent political figure towards athletes. The article does not provide further details on the outcome or any official responses from Brij Bhushan or relevant authorities.

NEW DELHI, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday sharply criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his recent remarks to students accused of abusing him and his late mother during the anti-paper leak protests at Jantar Mantar. Gandhi accused Modi of lacking the authority to offer forgiveness, arguing that students, many of whom are unemployed and struggling with the state of India’s education system, are in "severe pain" and require an apology, not leniency. During a book launch event in Parliament, Gandhi directly challenged Modi’s assertion that the youths involved in the protests were "misguided children" who needed guidance rather than punishment. "Who is he to forgive them?" Gandhi asked, emphasizing that the students deserved acknowledgment of the harm caused by the government’s actions. He pointed to the ongoing protests, which began in June 2026 and lasted 36 days before concluding on July 25, following the resignation of Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan and the government’s acceptance of the protesters’ demands. Gandhi linked the unrest to what he described as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s (RSS) efforts to impose a singular historical narrative on the nation. He cited the Indian Constitution, which describes India as a "Union of States," to argue that each state embodies the unique history, traditions, and languages of its people. "When you say Tamil Nadu, inside it is the history of the Tamil people, their pain, suffering, and happiness," he stated. "Every state has the right to express its own culture and language." According to Gandhi, the RSS believes only its version of history matters, leading to widespread resistance among students who feel their cultural identities are being undermined. Gandhi also accused the government of failing to provide a functional education system, describing it as "terrible" and "cruel." He alleged that the system has become privatized and exploitative, forcing students to accept a distorted historical perspective. "The soul of the system has been captured by the RSS," he said, pointing to the influence of the organization within the education ministry. He further claimed that students are not encouraged to question the system or pursue their interests, instead being compelled to adopt a narrow historical framework dictated by the RSS. In addition to criticizing Modi, Gandhi targeted Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of authorizing the police crackdown on students during the protests. During a Lok Sabha session, Gandhi had previously accused Shah of fearfully avoiding parliamentary proceedings, suggesting his absence was due to a lack of courage. "The home minister authorised the shooting on our students," Gandhi alleged. "He put pellets into the blood of our students. He ordered the students of India to be shot," he said, highlighting the physical and emotional toll of the police response. Meanwhile, BJP leader Ramesh Bidhuri sparked controversy by claiming that individuals engaged in tire repairs and locksmithing outnumbered students at the Jantar Mantar protest. Speaking at a "Gen Z Summit" in Tughlaqabad, Bidhuri suggested that the protest was largely composed of "misguided" youth who had been misled by opposition figures. He argued that the movement was fueled by misinformation and emotional manipulation, with some participants allegedly celebrating after the government met their demands. His remarks drew sharp rebukes from opposition leaders, including Congress MP Atishi, who dismissed Bidhuri as part of a faction that sought to divide society along lines of caste, religion, or profession. The protests, initially centered around the cancellation of the NEET-UG exam, evolved into a broader critique of the education system and the perceived dominance of the RSS in shaping national identity. The movement gained traction across the country, with students demanding fairer assessments and recognition of regional cultures. The government eventually conceded to some of the protesters’ demands, leading to the dispersal of the demonstrations. However, the tensions remain high, with both sides continuing to accuse each other of misrepresentation and political manipulation. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on the legitimacy of the protests and the role of political entities in shaping public discourse. With the education system under scrutiny and the issue of historical narratives at the heart of the conflict, the debate is likely to persist, influencing the trajectory of India’s social and political landscape in the coming months.

2 reports

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 703 days ago
Brij Bhushan case verdict today: From allegations and protests of wrestlers to defence arguments

The article reports on the upcoming verdict in the Brij Bhushan case, which involves allegations against a prominent politician linked to the Indian Wrestling Federation. It outlines the background of the case, including protests by wrestlers and the defense arguments presented. The focus is on the legal proceedings and the controversy surrounding the case.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the case, covering both the allegations and the defense arguments without overtly favoring either side. It mentions the protests by wrestlers but does not take a clear stance on their legitimacy or the broader political implications. The framing remains客观,

Why factuality (65): The article provides a general overview of the Brij Bhushan case verdict, mentioning the allegations, protests by wrestlers, and defense arguments. However, without a primary source document, it is difficult to assess the exact details of the verdict or the full context of the case. It aligns with c

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, summarizing the events without overt bias. It presents both the allegations and the defense arguments, though it leans slightly towards highlighting the controversy surrounding the case.

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 65Objective 603 days ago
'Wrestlers Will Tell About Their Pain, I Am Happy': BJP's Brij Bhushan To NDTV

The article discusses a controversy involving BJP leader Brij Bhushan and Indian wrestlers who protested against him in January 2023. The wrestlers, including Olympic medalists Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Bajrang Punia, accused Brij Bhushan of sexual exploitation and intimidation during their protest at Jantar Mantar. The incident highlights allegations of misconduct by a prominent political figure towards athletes. The article does not provide further details on the outcome or any official responses from Brij Bhushan or relevant authorities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a serious allegation of sexual exploitation and intimidation by a political figure against athletes, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that emphasizes accountability and justice for victims. The focus on the wrestlers' grievances and the political nature of

Why factuality (65): This article mentions the BJP's increased youth outreach following the Gen Z-led protest, but it lacks detailed information on the protest itself. It refers to the event briefly and does not provide substantial context or analysis.

Why objectivity (60): The article is somewhat neutral but lacks depth. It mentions the protest but does not explore the underlying issues or provide balanced viewpoints.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories