Brussels cuts funding to Bosnia and Serbia, money goes to neighbors that progress faster
The European Union is preparing to reallocate funds intended for reform programs in Western Balkan countries towards nations making the fastest progress in accession processes—Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia. The financial mechanism, known as the Reform and Growth Instrument, was established in 2024 with €6 billion allocated for the period 2024–2027, aiming to accelerate economic development and double the size of economies in the region over the next decade. As of June 2026, only around €673 million has been disbursed, mostly to Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia, which have implemented domestic reforms. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Serbia lag behind in meeting obligations. Funds are conditional on completing defined reform steps within agreed deadlines. If states fail to meet these requirements, the European Commission may retain portions or all of the allocated funds. Bosnia and Herzegovina could be the biggest loser, having received no payments due to failing to fulfill any reform conditions, particularly due to its complex institutional structure. The Commission has warned since April about the possibility of reallocating unused funds.
A new study has been presented in Zagreb, highlighting the significant role that media in neighboring countries—particularly Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro—play in shaping public perception regarding Croatia and its political figures. The research was conducted in collaboration between the Institute for Research on Hybrid Conflicts in Zagreb and the Institute for Social and Political Research in Mostar. It focuses on how media narratives influence the social and political landscapes of these two countries as they pursue European Union integration. The study also examines how Croatian media portrayments of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro contribute to this dynamic.
The findings reveal that media in both Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro often construct reality in ways that differ from expectations. This includes the portrayal of Croatian politicians, where some outlets fail to distinguish clearly between roles such as prime minister and president, unlike Croatian media. Additionally, certain Croatian politicians are subjected to negative stereotypes, with one example being the comparison of Minister of Foreign Affairs Gordana Grlić-Radman to a fictional character known for deceit. Such depictions suggest that there is a tendency to label contemporary Croatia as a successor state to the Independent State of Croatia (NDH) and to imply that it collaborates with Serbia based on ideas attributed to Slobodan Milošević.
The study further notes that while public sentiment towards EU membership is notably positive among Montenegrins, especially among younger generations and students, the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina is more complex. There is a noticeable difference in attitudes depending on ethnic composition, with Serbs generally showing less enthusiasm for EU integration compared to Bosniaks. However, even within Bosnia and Herzegovina, support for EU integration is stronger in urban areas than in rural ones. In contrast, media influence appears weaker when it comes to EU-related topics but is more pronounced when discussing neighboring states like Croatia, particularly among Serbs who tend to perceive Croatia as having hegemonic ambitions.
One of the most interesting aspects highlighted by the study is the interest shown by young people in Montenegro toward European integration and politics. Researchers expressed optimism about future developments, considering them as potential drivers of societal and political change over the next three decades. This perspective contrasts with the common narrative found in some media outlets which portray Croatia negatively.
Moreover, the research indicates that statements made by Croatian politicians are closely monitored and interpreted within the media landscape of neighboring countries. These interpretations can vary significantly, sometimes leading to misunderstandings or misrepresentations. Despite this, the study provides a framework for understanding the narratives shaped by media in these regions, offering insights into how information flows and influences public opinion.
The implications of this study extend beyond academic circles, influencing discussions around media policy and international relations. As both Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro continue their paths toward EU membership, understanding the role of media becomes increasingly important. The study underscores the need for continued monitoring of media narratives in these countries, emphasizing their impact on national discourse and foreign policy perceptions. Future research could explore how changes in media strategies might affect public attitudes and regional cooperation efforts.
Go to the primary sources (5)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The Economist reports that U.S. energy policy in the Western Balkans is increasingly focused on exporting American liquefied natural gas (LNG), creating tensions with European Union interests. The article highlights the Croatian LNG terminal on Krk Island, operational since 2021, as a key entry point for U.S. LNG into Europe. This has led to growing divergence between U.S. and EU policies in the region. The U.S. aims to reduce reliance on Russian gas by promoting LNG exports, exemplified by initiatives like the 'Trump Peace Pipelines Framework' and agreements involving American companies. However, European officials warn that increased dependence on U.S. gas could slow the transition to renewable energy and hinder alignment with EU energy regulations. The article also notes political implications, including the involvement of American firms and former Trump associates in projects involving Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the influence of U.S. pressure on regional leaders such as Milorad Dodik.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the U.S. push for LNG as an attempt to reassert American dominance and counter European and Russian influence, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often critiques U.S. foreign intervention and supports European sovereignty. It emphasizes the potential negative impact
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): High factual accuracy aligning closely with the primary source, though slightly less detailed than the original. The tone is mostly neutral but shows some bias toward highlighting American influence.
The European Union is preparing to reallocate funds intended for reform programs in Western Balkan countries towards nations making the fastest progress in accession processes—Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia. The financial mechanism, known as the Reform and Growth Instrument, was established in 2024 with €6 billion allocated for the period 2024–2027, aiming to accelerate economic development and double the size of economies in the region over the next decade. As of June 2026, only around €673 million has been disbursed, mostly to Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia, which have implemented domestic reforms. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Serbia lag behind in meeting obligations. Funds are conditional on completing defined reform steps within agreed deadlines. If states fail to meet these requirements, the European Commission may retain portions or all of the allocated funds. Bosnia and Herzegovina could be the biggest loser, having received no payments due to failing to fulfill any reform conditions, particularly due to its complex institutional structure. The Commission has warned since April about the possibility of reallocating unused funds.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the EU’s potential reallocation of funds based on reform progress, without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on the Commission’s decision-making process, including quotes from an EU spokesperson, and provides balanced context,
A study conducted by the Institute for Research on Hybrid Conflicts in Zagreb and the Institute for Social and Political Research in Mostar examines how media in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Montenegro shape narratives influencing their social and political landscapes, particularly in relation to Croatia and European Union integration. The research highlights how these media often frame Croatian politicians and the country itself in specific ways, sometimes drawing comparisons to historical figures or suggesting continuity with past political dynamics. It notes that Croatian media typically differentiate between roles such as prime ministers and presidents, but this distinction is less clear in BiH and Montenegrin media. The study also reveals varying levels of public support for EU membership among populations in BiH and Montenegro, with notable differences based on ethnicity and geography.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a study analyzing media narratives in neighboring countries regarding Croatia and its politicians. While the study critiques certain portrayals of Croatian leaders and suggests biases in how they are framed, it does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided,
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenter5 days ago
A study conducted under the 'Info 25' project has shown that media narratives significantly influence perceptions of European integration in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro. The analysis of several hundred media outlets revealed that some spread negative narratives about Croatia. Public opinion research indicated strong support for European and Euro-Atlantic integration among Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina, followed by Bosniaks, while Serbs showed the least support. Dr. Gordan Akrap, leading the research on information policies and integration, noted that findings in Montenegro differ from common media portrayals, with young people advocating cooperation with Croatia and seeking EU membership for Montenegro.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a research project without overtly favoring any side. It includes balanced quotes from researchers and highlights differing perspectives, particularly between media narratives and youth opinions in Montenegro. There is no clear ideological framing or biased word选择.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Croatia
