ON
← Back to feed
To make matters worse, it's not the music of some stupid pop star, but of the once-cool rock band
Croatia🏛️ Politicsyesterday

To make matters worse, it's not the music of some stupid pop star, but of the once-cool rock band

The article is a critical review of The Strokes' latest album 'Reality Awaits', comparing it unfavorably to their earlier work 'Is This It', which the author considers one of the best debut albums in pop music history. The reviewer notes that the new album lacks the energy, rawness, and emotional depth of their previous work, describing it as tired, empty, and disorienting. They criticize the overuse of auto-tune and the band's failure to find a new musical territory. While acknowledging Julian Casablancas' melancholy and depression, the reviewer expresses frustration with the album's lack of substance and concludes that it was only listened to twice out of professional duty.

The Strokes have released their latest album Reality Awaits, which has been met with widespread disappointment among critics. The band, once hailed as one of the defining voices of modern rock, has struggled to match the brilliance of their debut Is This It (2001). Critics argue that Reality Awaits lacks the raw energy, emotional depth, and artistic cohesion that characterized the group’s early work. Instead, the album is described as dull, uninspired, and overly reliant on auto-tune to mask its deficiencies. The album was produced by Rick Rubin, who previously worked with the band on The New Abnormal (2020), which was considered a more successful return to form. However, Reality Awaits has failed to live up to the expectations set by that release. Reviews suggest that the music feels directionless, with songs that lack memorable hooks and emotional resonance. Many listeners have found the album difficult to finish after the first listen, a stark contrast to the immediate impact of Is This It. The Strokes' lead singer, Julian Casablancas, has long been associated with a certain kind of melancholic, introspective style. His vocal delivery, often marked by a sense of weariness and detachment, has become a signature element of the band's sound. While some critics acknowledge this as a valid artistic choice, others argue that it has led to a stagnation in the band’s creative output. The new album is seen as another example of Casablancas attempting to navigate the challenges of contemporary life through his music, yet the results feel hollow and unconvincing. The band’s decline has been gradual but noticeable over the past decade. After the success of Is This It, they continued to produce albums such as Room On Fire (2004) and First Impressions of Earth (2006), both of which received mixed reviews. While these albums were not as groundbreaking as their debut, they still maintained a level of quality that kept fans engaged. However, subsequent releases, including Angles (2008) and Made in the USA (2013), were widely criticized for lacking the urgency and innovation that defined the band’s earlier work. The Strokes’ current situation reflects broader trends within the rock genre. As the landscape of popular music has shifted toward more polished, commercially driven sounds, many bands that emerged during the late 20th century have struggled to remain relevant. The Strokes, once seen as pioneers of a new wave of alternative rock, have increasingly found themselves in a niche, overshadowed by younger acts that embrace a more experimental or electronic approach. Their failure to evolve creatively has left them behind in an ever-changing musical world. Despite the criticism, there is a recognition that The Strokes have contributed significantly to the evolution of rock music. Their influence can be heard in countless artists who followed in their wake. Yet, the recent album serves as a reminder that even the most celebrated bands must continue to innovate or risk becoming relics of a bygone era. For now, Reality Awaits stands as a disappointing chapter in the band’s history, one that raises questions about whether they will ever reclaim the creative spark that made them so beloved in the early 2000s.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 60yesterday
To make matters worse, it's not the music of some stupid pop star, but of the once-cool rock band

The article is a critical review of The Strokes' latest album 'Reality Awaits', comparing it unfavorably to their earlier work 'Is This It', which the author considers one of the best debut albums in pop music history. The reviewer notes that the new album lacks the energy, rawness, and emotional depth of their previous work, describing it as tired, empty, and disorienting. They criticize the overuse of auto-tune and the band's failure to find a new musical territory. While acknowledging Julian Casablancas' melancholy and depression, the reviewer expresses frustration with the album's lack of substance and concludes that it was only listened to twice out of professional duty.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a cultural critique of a music album and does not engage with politically charged topics such as government, elections, or social policies. As such, it is considered apolitical and therefore leans toward the center.

Why factuality (75): The article discusses The Strokes' career and critical reception, referencing specific albums like 'Is This It', 'Room On Fire', and 'The New Abnormal'. While it provides some historical context and criticizes later works, there is limited verification of specific claims about the band's influence o

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat nostalgic and critical, with a clear preference for The Strokes' early work over their later output. The author expresses personal disappointment with the band's evolution, which introduces an emotional bias rather than maintaining neutrality.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories