ON
← Back to feed
Turning point in Turkey, Erdoğan declared: European Union is no longer our priority
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative6 days ago

Turning point in Turkey, Erdoğan declared: European Union is no longer our priority

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stated during a televised interview with Al Jazeera that Turkey's accession to the European Union is no longer a priority, although he emphasized that the country will not close its doors to membership. He criticized the EU for potentially losing out if it continues to reject Turkey's applications. Turkey has been a candidate for EU membership since 1999, with accession talks opened in 2005 but now frozen due to ongoing setbacks in democracy, rule of law, and human rights. Recent criticism against Turkish authorities centers on their treatment of opposition figures, particularly the closure of the offices of former Istanbul mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu. The trial of İmamoğlu, facing charges of corruption, money laundering, and founding a criminal organization, is set to continue at the Silivri district court in Istanbul. The Turkish opposition views these actions as politically motivated attempts by Erdoğan to eliminate his most prominent rival through the judiciary, while the government denies any influence over the judicial system.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced during a televised address on Sunday that Turkey’s accession to the European Union is no longer a priority for the country, although he emphasized that the door to membership remains open. The statement came amid ongoing tensions over democratic backsliding and human rights concerns, which have led to stalled accession talks since 2005. The negotiations for Turkey's entry into the EU were initiated in 1999, with formal talks opened in 2005. However, progress has been halted due to continuous setbacks in areas such as democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights. Critics argue that Turkey has consistently failed to meet the Copenhagen criteria, which outline the conditions for candidate countries seeking EU membership. These include respect for human rights, the rule of law, and stable institutions. Recent criticism against Turkish authorities has focused on their treatment of opposition figures. Notably, the government has faced backlash for its actions against former Istanbul mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, a prominent critic of President Erdoğan. İmamoğlu, who was elected in 2023, has been subjected to legal proceedings under charges including corruption, money laundering, and founding a criminal organization. His trial, which had been postponed, was set to continue on Monday before the court in the Silivri district of Istanbul. The Turkish opposition views these legal actions against İmamoğlu as politically motivated, accusing Erdoğan of using the judiciary to eliminate his most visible rival. They claim that the ruling party is undermining judicial independence by exerting undue influence over court decisions. In contrast, the government maintains that it does not interfere with the judiciary and that all legal procedures are conducted impartially. Erdoğan’s remarks reflect a broader shift in Turkey’s foreign policy priorities. While the EU has long been a key goal for Ankara, recent years have seen increased emphasis on strengthening ties with other regions, particularly the Middle East and North Africa. This realignment comes as Turkey seeks to assert itself as a regional power independent of Western institutions. The president’s comments suggest a growing skepticism toward the EU’s ability to accommodate Turkey’s political and economic ambitions. International observers have noted that Erdoğan’s stance could further complicate the already fragile relationship between Turkey and the EU. The bloc has repeatedly expressed concern over Turkey’s democratic standards and human rights record, while also acknowledging the strategic importance of maintaining dialogue with Ankara. The situation remains fluid, with both sides continuing to engage in diplomatic efforts despite the challenges. As the legal proceedings against İmamoğlu proceed, the outcome will likely serve as another test case for the perceived independence of Turkey’s judiciary. Meanwhile, Erdoğan’s public statements signal a more assertive approach to Turkey’s international standing, potentially reshaping the dynamics of its relations with the EU and other global actors. The next steps will depend on how these developments unfold and whether they lead to renewed engagement or further divergence between Turkey and the European Union.

2 reports

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 756 days ago
Turning point in Turkey, Erdoğan declared: European Union is no longer our priority

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stated during a televised interview with Al Jazeera that Turkey's accession to the European Union is no longer a priority, although he emphasized that the country will not close its doors to membership. He criticized the EU for potentially losing out if it continues to reject Turkey's applications. Turkey has been a candidate for EU membership since 1999, with accession talks opened in 2005 but now frozen due to ongoing setbacks in democracy, rule of law, and human rights. Recent criticism against Turkish authorities centers on their treatment of opposition figures, particularly the closure of the offices of former Istanbul mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu. The trial of İmamoğlu, facing charges of corruption, money laundering, and founding a criminal organization, is set to continue at the Silivri district court in Istanbul. The Turkish opposition views these actions as politically motivated attempts by Erdoğan to eliminate his most prominent rival through the judiciary, while the government denies any influence over the judicial system.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Erdoğan's comments as a strategic shift in Turkey's foreign policy, emphasizing his critique of the EU's stance and portraying the government as resisting external pressures. It highlights the political motivations behind legal actions against opposition leaders, suggesting a lack

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Erdoğan’s statement about Turkey’s EU accession not being a priority anymore, while noting that Turkey won’t close its doors to membership. It provides historical context about Turkey’s candidacy since 1999 and the suspended accession talks since 2005 due to democratic

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, presenting both the government’s stance and the opposition’s view. However, the article frames the situation as a political conflict, suggesting potential bias by highlighting the opposition’s claim that the prosecution is politically motivated. This subtle framing may infl

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago
Erdogan: EU accession is no longer a priority for Turkey

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan stated during an interview with Al Jazeera that Turkey's accession to the European Union is no longer a priority, although he emphasized that the country will not close its doors to membership. The EU has criticized Turkey for continuous backtracking on democratic reforms, rule of law, and human rights issues, leading to frozen accession talks since 2005. Recent criticism against Turkey centers on repression of opposition, particularly the closure of the offices of Erdogan’s rival and former Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu. Imamoglu faces charges of corruption, money laundering, and founding a criminal organization, with his trial set to continue in Istanbul’s Silivri district. Turkish opposition claims the legal actions against Imamoglu are politically motivated, aiming to eliminate a prominent opponent through the judiciary. The Turkish government denies interfering with judicial independence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: Erdogan downplays EU accession while acknowledging potential losses for the EU if negotiations continue. It reports on criticisms from the EU and the EU's stance on democracy and human rights, but does not overtly favor either side. The framing remains neutral

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content, providing the same information about Erdoğan’s comments and the status of Turkey’s EU accession process. It also includes similar details about the legal proceedings against İmamoğlu and the accusations of political motivation. Again, no primary source is a

Why objectivity (75): Similar to the first article, this version maintains a neutral tone but subtly presents the opposition’s perspective as credible, implying a possible bias toward portraying the government’s actions as politically motivated. This framing can affect perceived objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories