ON
← Back to feed
Make suggestions, make decisions, improve the crane, maybe?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive6 days ago

Make suggestions, make decisions, improve the crane, maybe?

The article is a personal reflection by Roman Masten from Britof, detailing his involvement in the participatory budgeting process in Kranj for the years 2027 and 2028. He has been submitting project proposals since 2022, including the 'Reorganization of Existing Parking Paths into Walking Paths' in KS Britof, which was approved in 2024. However, he noticed that parts of the path were not completed during the 2026 implementation phase. He contacted the city council requesting the full realization of the project, but received a response stating that most funds had been used and the remaining amount would not suffice for the remaining work. The city suggested resubmitting the proposal under the new participatory budgeting framework. Masten finds this suggestion cynical, as he expects the project to be completed within the next year rather than repeatedly resubmitting proposals. He criticizes the city’s financial management and suggests that the city might find funding through lottery proceeds if a winner from Kranj receives such funds.

A resident of Kranj has expressed frustration over the partial implementation of a community-voted project aimed at improving local walking trails, highlighting concerns about municipal budget allocation and accountability. The issue centers around a proposal titled “Dopolnitev obstoječih sprehajalnih poti v KS Britof” (“Completion of Existing Walking Paths in KS Britof”), which was approved by voters in October 2024 but reportedly left unfinished due to financial constraints. The resident, Roman Masten from the village of Britof, claims that while some parts of the trail were completed in 2025 or 2026, others remain unaddressed despite being included in the original plan. Masten stated he submitted the initial proposal for the walking path improvements back in 2022 and saw his first suggestion realized in the following years. He later resubmitted a new proposal in 2024, which was again voted into action. However, after observing the work begin in 2026, he noticed that certain sections of the path had not been addressed. In response, he contacted the city administration, requesting that the entire project be completed as originally planned. The municipality responded with a statement explaining that nearly all available funds had already been allocated to other projects in previous years, leaving insufficient resources to finish the walking path. It suggested that Masten submit the project again as part of the participatory budgeting process for 2027 and 2028, citing the official website for more information. Masten criticized this approach, calling it cynical. He argued that if the city had already spent its budget on other initiatives, it should have completed the project within the timeframe initially agreed upon rather than asking residents to resubmit proposals repeatedly. He noted that the city might have received additional funding through a lottery win, which could potentially cover the remaining costs. He expressed disappointment with the current situation and suggested modifying the city’s slogan for participatory budgeting, “Predlagaj. Odločaj. Izboljšaj Kranj.” (“Propose. Decide. Improve Kranj.”), to reflect a different dynamic. He proposed changing it to “Predlagaj. Glasuj. Odločala bo Občina Kranj.” (“Propose. Vote. The City of Kranj will decide.”), emphasizing that the final decision lies with the municipality rather than the citizens who propose ideas. Masten confirmed that he did not submit a new proposal for the 2027–2028 participatory budgeting cycle, as he does not want to further strain the city's financial position. He added that the city might still find the necessary funds to complete the project, particularly given reports that it has received money from a lottery winner based in Kranj. The participatory budgeting initiative allows residents to suggest and vote on projects that can be funded using public resources. This system aims to increase civic engagement and ensure that local priorities are reflected in urban planning decisions. However, the case of the walking path in Britof raises questions about how effectively these funds are managed and whether approved projects are fully implemented. Residents of Kranj have long supported participatory budgeting as a means of involving the community in shaping their environment. Yet, instances like this one highlight potential challenges, including limited financial resources and delays in executing approved plans. These issues may affect public trust in the process and the willingness of residents to continue submitting proposals. The city council has not publicly commented on Masten’s specific concerns regarding the walking path project. However, officials have previously emphasized the importance of balancing multiple competing demands for public funds, often prioritizing urgent infrastructure needs or emergency repairs. As the 2027–2028 participatory budgeting cycle approaches, residents will once again have the opportunity to propose new projects. Whether the city will address outstanding commitments from previous years remains uncertain. For now, Masten continues to monitor developments, hopeful that the remaining portion of the walking path in Britof will eventually be completed.

1 reports

Gorenjski glas logoGorenjski glasIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
Make suggestions, make decisions, improve the crane, maybe?

The article is a personal reflection by Roman Masten from Britof, detailing his involvement in the participatory budgeting process in Kranj for the years 2027 and 2028. He has been submitting project proposals since 2022, including the 'Reorganization of Existing Parking Paths into Walking Paths' in KS Britof, which was approved in 2024. However, he noticed that parts of the path were not completed during the 2026 implementation phase. He contacted the city council requesting the full realization of the project, but received a response stating that most funds had been used and the remaining amount would not suffice for the remaining work. The city suggested resubmitting the proposal under the new participatory budgeting framework. Masten finds this suggestion cynical, as he expects the project to be completed within the next year rather than repeatedly resubmitting proposals. He criticizes the city’s financial management and suggests that the city might find funding through lottery proceeds if a winner from Kranj receives such funds.

Bias read (Progressive): The article expresses frustration with the local government's handling of public projects and questions their financial responsibility and decision-making. While not overtly partisan, the tone leans left due to criticism of bureaucratic inefficiency and calls for more direct citizen influence over财政

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed personal experience regarding participation in Kranj's participatory budgeting process. It describes specific projects, timelines, and interactions with the city council, aligning with the general understanding of participatory budgeting processes in Slovenia. The infor

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical and expresses disappointment with the city council's handling of the project. While the author presents their perspective, there is an element of frustration and skepticism, which may influence the reader's perception. The article leans slightly towards a negative view

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories