ON
← Back to feed
The AI attack-ad nightmare is coming true
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 hr. ago

The AI attack-ad nightmare is coming true

AI-generated political advertisements are becoming increasingly prevalent in U.S. midterm elections, raising concerns about misinformation and ethical boundaries. These ads often depict fabricated scenarios involving politicians, such as defaced Bibles, upscale dinners, and board games with provocative messages. According to the Wesleyan Media Project, over $137 million has been spent on 220 AI-generated ads through October 11, primarily by Republican groups. While some states have implemented regulations requiring disclosure of AI use in political ads, there is currently no federal law governing this area. Examples include AI-generated ads targeting Senator Jon Ossoff and Governor Abdul El-Sayed, which have sparked debates about the impact of deepfakes on political discourse.

Polls indicate that American voters increasingly associate the Republican Party with providing tax breaks to large technology firms, potentially influencing the outcome of the upcoming November 3 midterms. According to a POLITICO Poll conducted by PF Global, nearly half of respondents identified Republicans as the party responsible for offering tax incentives to tech companies, compared to 21% who attributed this role to Democrats. This perception aligns with growing public concern over artificial intelligence and the expansion of data centers, which have become focal points in the political discourse. Voters expressed a stronger preference for candidates advocating against tax incentives for data centers, with approximately 20% stating this would be among their most critical tax issues during the midterms. Conversely, only 10% supported offering new incentives for data centers. The primary tax concerns for voters included increasing taxes on billionaires and reducing tax breaks for large corporations. These sentiments reflect broader anxieties about the rapid development of AI and the environmental impact of expanding data center infrastructure. Lawmakers from both parties have been responding to these concerns, with some proposing measures to limit tax incentives for data centers. Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) introduced a proposal that would impose a 100% tax on any state or local incentive offered to AI data centers. Meanwhile, Democrats have taken a more aggressive stance, focusing on specific instances where tax incentives benefited large tech companies. Former Senator Sherrod Brown highlighted the issue in his campaign against Senator Jon Husted (R-Ohio), criticizing the latter's policies as favoring wealthy tech firms at the expense of Ohio residents. Democrats have targeted companies like Meta, which have significantly reduced their tax liabilities through various incentives. They have linked the expansion of tax breaks under the 2025 tax cuts to increased data center construction. In contrast, Republicans have implemented broad tax incentives for various industries, which have been particularly beneficial to Big Tech, leading to substantial reductions in corporate tax payments as AI spending continues to rise. Democratic lawmakers with aspirations for the 2028 presidential campaign have suggested new taxes on AI companies, while others have proposed legislation to restrict data centers from utilizing incentives such as Opportunity Zones and bonus depreciation, which Republicans expanded in 2025. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) criticized the 2025 tax bill during a debate with his opponent, Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.), emphasizing the need to repeal what he described as a "data center tax scam." The current political climate surrounding AI and data centers remains uncertain, with unclear implications for future legislative actions. However, the poll revealed that a majority of respondents believe tech executives have been secretive about the risks of AI, and a significant portion of Americans think the risks of AI development outweigh the benefits, advocating for stricter government regulation of the technology. Meanwhile, the rapid growth of AI is encountering challenges related to the U.S. electrical grid, which is struggling to meet the increasing demand for power. Goldman Sachs warns that energy bottlenecks could hinder the AI race, highlighting the need for substantial investments in power infrastructure. The report indicates that global data center power demand is projected to surge by 170% between 2025 and 2030, with over 60% of this growth occurring in the United States. As the AI industry expands, so does the reliance on debt financing, raising concerns about the risks associated with delayed construction timelines. Goldman Sachs estimates that global hyperscaler debt issuance will reach $420 billion in 2027, with a significant portion of this debt financing capital expenditures in the sector. Despite these challenges, the boom in AI-related investments is transforming utilities into major beneficiaries, with anticipated capital plans reaching $1.3 trillion between 2026 and 2030. In Pennsylvania, the possibility of Democrats achieving a trifecta could facilitate environmental reforms and impose restrictions on data centers. Governor Josh Shapiro might pose a challenge to these efforts, given his position and influence within the state. As the midterms approach, the political landscape remains dynamic, with both parties navigating complex issues related to AI, data centers, and the broader economic implications of technological advancement.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

4 reports

The New York Times (US) logoThe New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 704 days ago
$137 Million in A.I.-Generated Ads Flood the Midterms

The article discusses the increasing use of artificial intelligence-generated content in political advertising during the U.S. midterm elections. It notes that Republican candidates have utilized AI tools more frequently than their Democratic counterparts, employing them for everything from minor improvements in campaign materials to creating realistic deepfake videos. This trend highlights the growing role of AI in modern political campaigns and raises concerns about the potential impact on voter perception and election integrity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual observation about the usage of AI-generated content by both major political parties without overtly favoring one side. It does not employ loaded language or selectively omit information to support a particular viewpoint. The focus is on the technological aspect rather,

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (70): The article presents a clear partisan angle by highlighting Republican use of AI over Democratic use, which introduces a potential bias. While it doesn't use overtly inflammatory language, the framing suggests a preference for one political group over another, reducing overall neutrality.

Bloomberg News logoBloomberg NewsIndependent🔒Center9 hr. ago
Ken Griffin on AI, Midterm Elections and Fiscal Policy

Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of Citadel, discussed the benefits and risks of artificial intelligence during an interview with Bloomberg's Dani Burger at Citadel's annual Future of Global Markets Conference in New York. He also addressed topics including the upcoming midterm elections, the state of the US economy, and fiscal policy. The discussion covered Griffin's perspectives on these issues but did not provide specific details or positions on any of the topics mentioned.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a general overview of Ken Griffin's participation in a conference where he discussed various topics, including politics and economics. No explicit ideological framing, biased language, or one-sided sourcing is present. The content remains neutral and descriptive of the event and

Bloomberg News logoBloomberg NewsIndependent🔒Center10 hr. ago
Citadel's Griffin Says US Has to 'Grow the Damn Economy'

Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of Citadel, stated during an interview with Bloomberg's Dani Burger at the Future of Global Markets Conference in New York that the United States needs to 'grow the damn economy.' He emphasized that achieving this goal requires Europe to also expand its economic growth. The remarks were made in the context of global financial discussions and reflect Griffin's perspective on international economic interdependence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward statement by Ken Griffin regarding the need for economic growth in both the U.S. and Europe. There is no evident framing that favors one side over another; the content remains neutral in tone and does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.

Axios logoAxiosIndependentCenteryesterday
The AI attack-ad nightmare is coming true

AI-generated political advertisements are becoming increasingly prevalent in U.S. midterm elections, raising concerns about misinformation and ethical boundaries. These ads often depict fabricated scenarios involving politicians, such as defaced Bibles, upscale dinners, and board games with provocative messages. According to the Wesleyan Media Project, over $137 million has been spent on 220 AI-generated ads through October 11, primarily by Republican groups. While some states have implemented regulations requiring disclosure of AI use in political ads, there is currently no federal law governing this area. Examples include AI-generated ads targeting Senator Jon Ossoff and Governor Abdul El-Sayed, which have sparked debates about the impact of deepfakes on political discourse.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the rise of AI-generated political ads without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from both affected politicians and the organizations running the ads, providing a balanced view of the issue.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories