Merše on the proposal to dismiss the President of the DZ and Fajonov
In Slovenia, opposition parliamentary groups Svoboda, Levica, and SD have proposed the removal of Državnega zbora (National Assembly) president Zoran Stevanović, accusing him of violating the constitutional order by failing to approve an extraordinary session agenda and consequently not establishing opposition investigative committees. The proposal also includes allegations surrounding MP Boris Mijič of the Resnica party. Political commentator and journalist Petra Merše believes the move is symbolic rather than politically significant, potentially strengthening cooperation between Resnica and the ruling coalition. She argues that the action is more about sending a message to the public than causing major political consequences. Meanwhile, Stevanović acknowledges Mijič’s breach of trust, noting his dishonesty regarding financial status, education data, and treatment of employees, but emphasizes that removing Mijič now would risk losing the parliamentary mandate of thousands of voters who supported their program. Merše highlights the impact of this scandal on Resnica, noting that each member in their small parliamentary group carries significant weight.
Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly and the party Resnica, has declared on social media that his party will take all necessary measures to ensure that Boris Mijič is no longer a member of parliament by October. This decision comes after a series of controversies surrounding Mijič's business practices and personal conduct. The move is aimed at removing Mijič from the parliamentary seat he currently holds, which was won under the Resnica banner rather than through his individual merits. The deadline for this action is set for October because, according to the law, if Mijič were to resign before this date, it would trigger supplementary elections in his electoral district. These elections could result in the loss of a parliamentary mandate for Resnica, which the party seeks to avoid. Therefore, the plan is to have Mijič step down by October, ensuring that the party retains its current number of representatives in the National Assembly. Stevanović emphasized that Mijič no longer has the moral right to sit in the National Assembly. He stated that the party had placed its trust in the wrong person, and that Mijič had failed to justify this trust with responsible actions. The president of Resnica also mentioned that the party had already taken steps to cover some of the debts incurred by former employees of Mijič’s company, Progros, using funds from his own pocket. However, these efforts have been overshadowed by recent revelations regarding Mijič's financial obligations and questionable business dealings. The controversy surrounding Mijič has escalated significantly in recent weeks. It began with reports that Progros owed substantial sums to its employees and the state in taxes and contributions. Mijič attributed these issues to the broader challenges within the construction industry, including non-payment by main contractors. However, further investigations revealed that Mijič had misrepresented his educational credentials, claiming to be a graduate of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy in Ljubljana, despite there being no record of such a degree. The situation took another turn when Mijič transferred ownership of his insolvent company, Progros, to Rok Snežič, a tax advisor known for his controversial business practices. This transfer was made without any compensation, raising questions about Mijič's intentions and accountability. Snežič subsequently renamed the company to Klukec and registered it as a camel breeding enterprise, a move that has been interpreted as both a provocation and a form of political commentary. The transfer of Progros to Snežič has sparked mixed reactions. While some critics view it as a clear attempt to evade responsibility, others see it as a strategic maneuver. The legal implications of this transfer remain unclear, with some experts suggesting that it might constitute a breach of corporate integrity or even a criminal act. However, others argue that the legal framework does not necessarily support such claims, given the complexities of corporate law and the distinction between personal liability and corporate responsibility. Stevanović has reiterated that the party will not allow Mijič to continue representing the interests of Resnica in the National Assembly. The party's stance is clear: Mijič must either fulfill his obligations to his former employees and the state or face public scrutiny and potential expulsion from the party. The focus remains on ensuring that the party maintains its parliamentary representation while addressing the ethical and financial responsibilities tied to Mijič's actions. As the situation unfolds, the impact on Mijič's reputation and the broader political landscape in Slovenia continues to evolve. The events surrounding Mijič's tenure and subsequent resignation highlight the complex interplay between personal accountability, corporate governance, and political strategy. The coming months will likely bring further developments as the consequences of these actions become more apparent.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The head of the Slovenian parliamentary group Resni.ca, Zoran Stevanović, has stated that member Boris Mijič no longer has the moral right to sit in parliament due to his actions, which have caused significant damage to the party. While legal procedures would require by-elections if Mijič were removed, which could cost the party a mandate, Stevanović says they will take all necessary political steps to ensure Mijič does not represent the party by October. He admitted he was shocked to learn of Mijič's misconduct, including financial issues, misleading information, and mistreatment of employees, which occurred without his knowledge. Stevanović emphasized that the party's mandate comes from its supporters, not from Mijič personally, and expects him to settle his obligations to workers and accept responsibility for his actions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the statements of Zoran Stevanović, who criticizes Boris Mijič for his actions but acknowledges the legal constraints preventing immediate removal. The tone remains focused on the internal party dynamics and the need for accountability, without overtly favoring one side over the
Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports statements from Zoran Stevanović regarding Boris Mijič’s actions and the consequences for Resni.ca. It includes direct quotes and aligns closely with the cross-source consensus on the situation involving Mijič’s alleged misconduct and the party’s response.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone by presenting Stevanović’s perspective without overtly favoring any political side. However, some phrases like 'prestopil vse meje' may carry implicit judgment, slightly reducing neutrality.
Info360IndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 827 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik stranke Resni.ca in predsednik parlamenta, je izrazil svoj šok zaradi dejanj poslancega Boris Mijiča, ki je prenesel svoje insolventno podjetje Progros na Roka Snežiča, kar je povzročilo večje finansijsne težave za delavce. Stevanović je poudaril, da Mijič prestopi meje in da ne sme biti v parlamentu, vendar stranka ne more takoj izbrisati njegovega mandata, ker bi tako izgubila mandat več tisoč volivcev. Mijič je tudi zavajal glede svoje izobrazbe in finančnega položaja. Predsednik vlade Janez Janša je oglasil svojo oceno, da gre za napačne stvari, vendar jih oceni kot manj pomembne v primerjavi z drugimi aktualnostmi.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Zoran Stevanović and Janez Janša regarding Boris Mijič's actions, providing their perspectives without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the reported facts and quotes rather than taking a clear ideological stance.
Why factuality (92): This article provides a detailed account of Stevanović’s comments on Mijič’s actions and the legal implications for Resni.ca. The information matches the cross-source consensus and includes specific details such as the timeline for potential changes in October.
Why objectivity (82): While the article presents facts objectively, it occasionally uses emotionally charged language such as 'mejo dokončno prestopil,' which can imply strong judgment rather than purely factual reporting.
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedCenterFactual 88Objective 754 days ago
In Slovenia, opposition parliamentary groups Svoboda, Levica, and SD have proposed the removal of Državnega zbora (National Assembly) president Zoran Stevanović, accusing him of violating the constitutional order by failing to approve an extraordinary session agenda and consequently not establishing opposition investigative committees. The proposal also includes allegations surrounding MP Boris Mijič of the Resnica party. Political commentator and journalist Petra Merše believes the move is symbolic rather than politically significant, potentially strengthening cooperation between Resnica and the ruling coalition. She argues that the action is more about sending a message to the public than causing major political consequences. Meanwhile, Stevanović acknowledges Mijič’s breach of trust, noting his dishonesty regarding financial status, education data, and treatment of employees, but emphasizes that removing Mijič now would risk losing the parliamentary mandate of thousands of voters who supported their program. Merše highlights the impact of this scandal on Resnica, noting that each member in their small parliamentary group carries significant weight.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's accusations against Stevanović and the commentary from Merše, who downplays the political significance of the move while acknowledging its symbolic value. It does not overtly favor one side over another, though it does highlight internal tensions within Res
Why factuality (88): The article covers the broader political context, including the opposition’s move against Stevanović and the ongoing status of Mijič. While it references external commentary from Peter Merše, it does not provide enough detail to fully confirm all claims independently.
Why objectivity (75): The article shows clear bias by framing the opposition’s actions as politically motivated and suggesting they aim to divide Resni.ca from the government. This introduces a subjective interpretation rather than an objective analysis.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
