The opposition has filed a motion to remove Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly, over alleged constitutional violations. Despite parliamentary recesses running from July 15 to September 1, which typically prevent regular sessions, political activity has remained intense. On Tuesday, a faction of the opposition submitted a proposal to dismiss Stevanović, citing his actions regarding opposition investigative committees as a breach of constitutional order. The motion was supported by members of Freedom, SD, and the Left, who accused him of abusing the constitution, particularly referencing the Mijič affair. Luka Mesec, a member of the Left party, stated in a media statement that someone occupying the position of president of the National Assembly should not be allowed to violate the constitution. Constitutional lawyers Ciril Ribičič, Albin Igličar, Miro Cerar, and Matej Avbelj have confirmed that the coalition and the Resni.ca party’s actions, specifically their rejection of the agenda blocking the determination of a parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube scandal, constitute a direct violation of the constitution. Stevanović responded to the motion via Instagram, stating that the proposal is based on a mistaken assumption that he has failed in his duties. He emphasized that he called two extraordinary sessions within the legal timeframe and included all requested points on the agenda proposed by the motion's sponsors. This would be the eleventh motion to remove the president of the National Assembly in the history of the independent state, with all previous attempts failing. A secret vote requiring 46 parliamentary votes is necessary for removal. On October 11, lawmakers scheduled an extraordinary session to hold a legislative referendum on amending the law on parliamentary investigations. The referendum question will ask whether voters support the implementation of the amendment to the law on parliamentary investigations (ZPPre-B), adopted by the National Assembly on May 26, 2026. This date could become a "super-referendum day," as the coalition and Resni.ca proposed holding three additional advisory referendums on the same day. These include questions on whether the right to financial social assistance for working-age individuals without objective barriers to employment should be conditional on performing community service, whether mandatory payment of RTV contributions should be abolished, and whether citizens of the Republic of Slovenia and other EU countries, but not third countries, should have voting rights in local elections. The left-wing opposition suggested establishing two permanent referendum days, the second Sunday in April and October. Meanwhile, the summer camp of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) began in Bovc with traditional meetings of municipal councils, members, and supporters of the SDS and the Gorniški Klub Dr. Henrika Tume. Janez Janša highlighted that the annual camp had evolved into the largest political gathering and the biggest political family meeting in Slovenia. Over two weeks, the camp will feature activities such as mountain climbing, sports events, workshops, lectures, cultural evenings, and family activities. Participants will climb Mount Triglav on August 8. In the Left party, the name Vesna has been removed from the title of the parliamentary group following demands from the party. Vesna accuses the Left of excluding them from decision-making processes and operating independently without coordination. They noted that progressive parties, including the Left, still view electoral results as a means to secure positions and distribute financial resources. The Left reaffirmed its commitment to the agreement made before the elections with Vesna, while also allocating one-third of funds to Vesna. Members of the Freedom Movement have introduced a bill proposing the introduction of a cultural voucher for young people in the National Assembly. During a session of the Committee on Justice, SD MP Andreja Katič claimed that parliamentary investigations could target any citizen, which she argued was a reason for collecting signatures for the referendum. Resni.ca MP Nedeljko Todorović countered this claim, emphasizing that the law explicitly limits parliamentary investigations to holders of public offices. He listed these officials, including the President and Vice Presidents of the Republic, MPs, members of the State Council, the Prime Minister, ministers, state secretaries, mayors, members of municipal councils, judges, prosecutors, constitutional court judges, heads and members of the Court of Auditors, the Governor and members of the Bank of Slovenia Board, and others specified by law as holding public functions. He reiterated that the law does not apply to all citizens and warned against misleading the public. Similar instances of misinformation have occurred previously, where complex legal changes were presented as threats to ordinary citizens, despite the law clearly restricting parliamentary investigations to holders of public functions. Mainstream personalities were included in the campaign to collect signatures, primarily to spread emotional messages rather than inform people about the content of the law. The week saw several notable moments in Slovenian politics. Former communist activists and current politicians were criticized for their approach to the referendum. The former Prime Minister Robert Golob sparked nostalgia by sharing memories of past visits to France. Meanwhile, humor and satire surrounded the end of the relationship between the Left and Vesna, with jokes circulating online. Additionally, a video featuring MP Katja Kokot from Resni.ca gained attention, highlighting both her enthusiasm for certain political developments and subsequent criticism from others.
6 reports
Gorenjski glasIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterdayA portion of Slovenia's opposition has proposed the removal of Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly, citing alleged violations of constitutional order related to parliamentary investigations into the Black Cube affair and other issues. The proposal comes despite ongoing parliamentary recesses, which typically prevent regular sessions but allow extraordinary ones. Several constitutional lawyers have supported the claim that Stevanović's actions, including blocking a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube scandal by rejecting the agenda, constitute a direct violation of the constitution. Stevanović responded via Instagram, defending his actions as lawful and within the required timeframe. This would be the eleventh attempt to remove him since Slovenia's independence, all of which have failed. A secret vote requiring 46 parliamentary votes would be needed for his removal. Additionally, a legislative referendum was scheduled for October 11 regarding amendments to the law on parliamentary inquiries. The same day could potentially become 'Super Referendum Day' if three additional advisory referendums are held on topics such as conditional eligibility for financial,
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's push for Stevanović's removal as a legitimate effort to uphold constitutional order, citing support from constitutional lawyers and highlighting specific controversies like the Black Cube affair. It emphasizes the left-wing parties' stance against Stevanović's in-
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the opposition's proposal to remove Zoran Stevanović as president of the National Assembly, citing violations of constitutional order and referencing legal experts' opinions. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the motion is politically motivated and unlikely to suc
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards critical commentary, suggesting the motion is a political maneuver rather than a genuine attempt at reform. There is some editorializing regarding the likelihood of success and the motives behind the opposition’s actions.
DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709 days agoThe Slovenian parliament has confirmed that a referendum on the proposed law regarding parliamentary investigations will take place on October 11. The initiative was supported by 57 votes, with none opposing. The decision follows the collection of 44,619 verified signatures by the referendum organizers. While the coalition parties have agreed to the referendum, they emphasize that this does not change their stance on the content of the proposed law. Mojca Žnidarič from the Democratic Party stated that the effectiveness of parliamentary investigation is a constitutional value, but delays could undermine its practical significance. Nedeljko Todorović from Resni.ca argued that the referendum organizers are misleading by claiming the new law would allow investigations into anyone. Lucija Tacer Perlin from Freedom insisted that the law’s target could be anyone, aiming to deter others from acting freely. Tina Brecelj from the Left claimed opposition to the law does not equate to supporting corruption, arguing that removing legal tools from those under investigation is not the solution. Some members of the governing coalition suggested the referendum campaign will focus on whether voters,
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives from various political parties involved in the debate over the referendum on the parliamentary investigation law. It includes quotes from both supporters and critics of the proposed law, providing balanced viewpoints without overtly favoring any side. The报道
Why factuality (85): The article reports accurately on the approval of the referendum date by parliament, citing the number of signatures collected and the vote count. It includes quotes from political figures expressing support for the referendum and discusses arguments from both sides regarding the purpose and implica
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards supporting the referendum, as evidenced by the positive framing of the coalition's actions and the emphasis on the importance of parliamentary oversight. While it presents multiple viewpoints, the overall narrative appears to favor the pro-referendum position, especially in th
DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 455 days agoThe article discusses the Slovenian left-wing party's stance on a proposed constitutional amendment regarding parliamentary investigations, highlighting concerns over potential abuse of power by the current ruling majority. It references Tina Brecelj’s support for a referendum to ensure democratic oversight, while criticizing the opposition's alleged manipulation of investigative commissions for political gain. The piece contrasts the actions of former leaders like Tamara Vonta and Tomaž Modic, who were accused of misleading citizens, with the current government's perceived desire to maintain control. The tone suggests skepticism toward the ruling party's intentions and calls for supporting media plurality.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the current ruling majority as seeking to suppress dissent and control information, using terms like 'brezbrižna do laži' (careless towards lies) and 'nadzor državljanov' (control of citizens). It portrays the left-wing party's push for a referendum as a democratic safeguard, with
Why factuality (85): The article reports on political discourse around a referendum proposal related to parliamentary inquiry reforms. It references specific statements from Tina Brecelj and mentions allegations against Tamara Vonta and Tomaž Modic regarding 'looking into refrigerators' as a metaphor for surveillance. W
Why objectivity (45): The tone is strongly partisan, using emotionally charged language such as 'brezbrižna do laži' and 'straši pred tem'. The article frames the opposition as conspiratorial and manipulative, while portraying the current government as seeking control over citizens. This reflects a clear ideological bias
Nova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 80Objective 652 days agoDuring a session of the Committee on Justice on July 22, 2026, MP Andreja Katič of the SDS claimed that parliamentary investigations could target any citizen, which she suggested was a reason for collecting signatures for a referendum. In response, MP Nedeljko Todorović of Resni.ca challenged her claim by citing the law, emphasizing that parliamentary investigations apply exclusively to holders of public office. He read aloud a section of the law stating that such investigations are conducted to assess the situation regarding the political accountability of individuals holding public functions, clarifying that they do not apply to all citizens. Todorović criticized Katič for misleading people and reiterated that the law limits investigations to those in public roles. The article references a link to additional information and includes a tweet from Todorović’s account.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the debate over parliamentary investigations through a critical lens toward the left-wing Resni.ca MP, who challenges the claims made by the center-right SDS MP. The tone emphasizes the importance of legal accuracy and criticizes the left for allegedly misleading the public with '
Why factuality (80): The article details a heated exchange between Resni.ca and SD members during parliamentary committee sessions, focusing on the scope of parliamentary investigations. It provides specific quotes and references to legal texts, aligning with other sources on the debate over the investigation's reach.
Why objectivity (65): The article has a somewhat confrontational tone, emphasizing the accusations made by Resni.ca against SD. While factual, it frames the discussion in a way that suggests bias toward one party's position.
DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 75Objective 658 days ago Under the Archives Act, the leftists, under various pretexts, advocated political police, and now how do they oppose it?Slovenia held two referendums on the Archives Act, in 2011 and 2014, both aimed at restricting access to archival materials, particularly those from the State Security Service (SDV). The leftist Transitional Left supported these restrictions, arguing they were necessary for national security, despite the SDV's history of repressing its own citizens. In 2011, the proposed law was rejected by voters, but three years later, the left coalition introduced anonymization of archives, which hindered historical research by obscuring identities and details in documents. Critics argue this was influenced by the left’s historical alignment with the SDV. Now, the same group accuses the current government of introducing a 'political police' through parliamentary investigations, though the article suggests this is hypocritical given their past actions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the left-wing Transitional Left as historically supportive of restrictive policies involving the SDV, including censorship and anonymization of sensitive documents. It criticizes them for hypocrisy in now accusing the current government of creating a 'political police,' while they
Why factuality (75): This commentary piece discusses Stevanović's role in enabling Janša's government and criticizes the opposition's attempts to remove him. It references political strategies and alliances, aligning with other sources on the political landscape.
Why objectivity (65): The tone is strongly critical of the opposition and supportive of the current government. It uses emotive language to frame the situation in a particular light, showing clear bias.
Zanima.meIndependentCenter5 hr. agoThe article highlights various notable moments from the past week in Slovenia, covering political commentary, cultural references, and international news. It features comments from Slovenian politicians like Žan Mahnič and Nataša Sukič regarding a referendum on parliamentary investigation laws, with Mahnič criticizing left-wing activists and Sukič sarcastically questioning the support for the daily newspaper. There is mention of a political rivalry involving figures like Zoran Stevanović and Janez Janša, along with a legal complaint related to intellectual property. The piece also includes a light-hearted reference to U.S. President Donald Trump sharing Tic Tac candies during a funeral ceremony and a nostalgic comment about former Prime Minister Robert Golob’s visit to the Champs-Élysées. Additionally, there is humor around a political satire referencing Lenin and a video clip mocking a politician named Katja Kokot, which sparked discussions about media portrayal.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers politically sensitive topics such as referendums, political rivalries, and media criticism, it presents these issues through a mix of commentary and humor rather than overtly partisan framing. The tone remains balanced, with multiple perspectives represented, including both左
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
