MP Boris Mijič donated the notorious company to the new owner Rok Snežič, whose main business is camel herding (VIDEO)
The Slovenian politician Boris Mijič has transferred his 100% ownership of the company Progros to his tax advisor Rok Snežič, according to the news portal 24 ur. The transfer was done through a contract signed at a notary on July 20th, and the company was renamed Klukec d.o.o., with camels breeding as its main activity. Despite this transfer, Mijič remains indebted to his employees for over €10,000 and to the Slovenian Financial Administration for more than €30,000 in unpaid taxes and contributions. Employees reportedly were dismissed without their knowledge through forged signatures, leading to police investigations. Luka Mesec, a prominent critic of Mijič, has repeatedly called for his resignation, and the Left Party has demanded an urgent session of the Chamber of Deputies' Economic, Labor, and Sports Committee due to Mijič’s actions. Snežič claims he initiated the transfer and that Mijič 'freely expropriated' his share in the company. However, Mesec has previously won two lawsuits against Snežič, who lacks funds to pay legal costs, prompting both Mesec and his lawyer to file an enforcement order against Snežič’s company. Snežič now allows Mesec to recover debts by giving him a
Boris Mijič, a member of parliament with the Resni party, has come under intense scrutiny following his decision to transfer ownership of his insolvent company Progros to Rok Snežič, a private business advisor, without charge. The move has sparked questions about whether political leaders face equal standards of accountability and who will be the next candidate for the company Klukec, which now operates under the name after the transfer. Mijič has faced criticism for unpaid wages to employees, tax debts, questionable education credentials, and a history of financial insolvency. The situation took a further turn when the company was transferred to Snežič, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing controversy. On 20 July, Mijič and Snežič signed a contract at a notary’s office transferring Mijič's entire shareholding in Progros to Snežič free of charge. The agreement confirmed that Snežič knew the company operated at a loss and had negative capital. After the transfer, the company was renamed Klukec, and its primary activity was registered as camel breeding. Despite the change in ownership, the legal entity remained the same, and all existing obligations, including debts to employees and the state, still apply. Snežič clarified that he does not personally guarantee the company's debts, as per the law governing limited liability companies. Snežič stated that he does not intend to deal with the company’s past operations, debts, or employees, emphasizing that he is not the director and thus not responsible for these issues. He claimed the transfer was intended to pass the company to Luka Mesec, a former labor minister and current coordinator for the Left Party, who holds a legal claim against him for approximately €2,500 in court costs. Mesec, however, indicated he would not pursue enforcement actions against the company, calling it a bad comedy show created by Snežič. Instead, Mesec suggested that three journalists from the website Necenzurirano might soon take control of the company, citing their €25,000 debt to Snežič. Legal experts have weighed in on the implications of the transfer. Miha Juhart, a legal expert specializing in civil and commercial law, noted that while the transfer itself is legally permissible, it raises concerns about the company's future. If the company remains insolvent, the director might need to propose bankruptcy proceedings. Without additional capitalization, the company could face liquidation. Juhart emphasized that the legal entity remains responsible for its debts, and the new owner would not automatically assume personal liability unless specific legal conditions are met. The situation has drawn criticism from various quarters. Anže Logar, the minister for economy, labor, and sports, described the transfer as a mockery of unpaid workers and institutions of the state, indicating a failure of the rule of law. He called for a strict fight against corruption and abuse, stressing the need for reforms to improve trust in public institutions. Similarly, Jan Zobec, a former constitutional judge, questioned whether Mijič was trying to avoid responsibility through a misunderstanding of legal personhood. He noted that while the transfer might appear to be a gift, it is actually a legal operation that does not absolve Mijič of his obligations to creditors. The transfer has also raised ethical questions about the responsibilities of politicians and business leaders. Mijič has pledged to pay off his debts by the end of the year and apologized to affected parties. However, critics argue that his actions reflect a lack of accountability and a tendency to shift burdens onto others. The case highlights the broader issue of how political figures handle their business affairs and the potential consequences for both individuals and the public. As the situation unfolds, attention turns to the next steps regarding the management and fate of Klukec. With multiple stakeholders involved, including employees, the state, and other creditors, the company's future remains uncertain. Legal experts suggest that the new management will need to address the company's financial health and ensure compliance with legal requirements. Whether this will lead to improved practices or further complications remains to be seen.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Some former employees of the construction company Progros, owned by MP Boris Mijič, are demanding over 41,000 euros in unpaid wages, regressions, and other entitlements. The workers have not yet received an official payment request, prompting them to hire a detective, according to the website Necenzurirano. The total claims from 13 former employees amount to 41,285 euros, including unpaid salaries, regressions, holiday compensation, and other benefits dating back to spring 2025. Additional amounts include contributions and taxes that the employer was supposed to settle. The actual debt owed by Progros is higher due to these additional costs. The company has no remaining assets to cover debts, and previous creditors have already seized some assets. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) has initiated enforcement proceedings against Progros, which owes over 30,000 euros. Additionally, Progros has outstanding debts to a local restaurant, which was unable to collect payments for meals prepared for its employees. Due to blocked bank accounts, Progros cannot enforce debts through court, despite having obtained enforcement orders. The company owes over 3,600 euros to the餐厅. MP Mǐ
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the personal financial mismanagement of MP Boris Mijič, highlighting his alleged dishonesty regarding education and his failure to repay debts. While the focus is on the company’s financial issues, the emphasis on Mijič’s personal accountability and potential dism
Why factuality (80): The article provides factual information about the debt owed by Mijič's company but doesn't directly reference the primary source regarding his education. It focuses on financial aspects rather than the educational claim itself.
Why objectivity (70): The article remains relatively neutral in tone while reporting facts about the debt. However, it doesn't address the educational controversy mentioned in the primary source, making it less comprehensive.
ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 309 days ago
The article by RTV Slovenia reporter Eugenija Carl focuses on politician Boris Mijič from the party Resnice, criticizing him for shifting responsibility for workers' issues onto his mother. The headline uses provocative language questioning when someone becomes 'kronani bednik' (literally 'crowned beggar'), implying that Mijič is exploiting his family connections to avoid accountability. The piece frames Mijič’s actions as a form of corruption, suggesting he passes off work-related responsibilities onto his mother rather than taking personal responsibility. The tone is critical of Mijič’s behavior and aligns with a left-leaning perspective by highlighting perceived exploitation and lack of accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Boris Mijič's actions as a form of corruption and moral failure, using emotionally charged language ('kronani bednik', 'rabote prevališ na mamo') that implies exploitation and irresponsibility. It emphasizes the ethical implications of passing responsibility to family members, a立场
Why factuality (50): The article presents an accusation against Boris Mijič, a politician, suggesting he shifts responsibility for work-related issues onto his mother. However, there is no primary source document to verify these claims, and the article lacks specific evidence or citations. The tone is confrontational an
Why objectivity (30): The article uses strong, emotive language such as 'bednik' (which translates to 'waste' or 'scoundrel') and frames the issue in a way that implies guilt without providing evidence. It appears to take a partisan stance against Mijič without offering alternative viewpoints or context.
The article reports on allegations of financial misconduct involving Boris Mijič and his former company Progros. It claims that after Mijič faced significant difficulties, Rok Snežič provided assistance by renaming the company to 'Novo necenzurirano d.o.o.' This action allegedly prevented a court ruling against Mijič. The article cites internal documents obtained by 'necenzurirano.si' suggesting that Snežič later renamed the company to 'Klukec' and promoted a narrative attributing this change to Luke Mesic. The piece further alleges that both Mijič and Snežič have been implicated in financial irregularities, including owing thousands of euros to employees and the state. The article also questions the credibility of legal documentation surrounding the transfer of ownership, noting that the notary, Mojca Tavčar Pasar, was not informed of all relevant circumstances and did not detect any signs of wrongdoing. The report raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the lack of transparency in the transaction.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič in a manner that suggests a cover-up or deliberate misrepresentation of financial dealings. It emphasizes the involvement of high-profile figures and highlights potential corruption or misuse of power. The tone leans toward exposing what's
The article discusses the controversy surrounding Boris Mijič, a Slovenian politician who transferred his ownership stake in the company Progros to Rok Snežič without paying off debts. The transfer was formalized on July 20, 2026, under the new company name Klukec, which continues to operate with outstanding obligations. While Mijič claims the financial difficulties were due to unpaid client invoices and liquidity issues, critics argue that the move raises questions about accountability and transparency. Snežič, who has not taken personal responsibility for the debts, maintains that he is not personally liable under limited liability company laws. Additionally, there is mention of a legal dispute between Snežič and former Minister Luka Mesc, where Mesc sought to enforce a judgment against Snežič, potentially leading to asset seizure.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a case of political accountability, highlighting Mijič’s failure to address financial responsibilities while serving in public office. It emphasizes the lack of personal liability for Snežič, suggesting a critique of how such cases are handled within the political
Rok Snežič, lastnik podjetja Progros, je razkril, da je brezplačno prevzel podjetje in ga preimenoval v Klukec, s katerim se ukvarja z rejijo živali. Snežič je napovedal, da bo lastništvo podjetja prenesel na sokoordinatorja in poslanca Levice Luko Mesa, ki ima pravnomočno izvršbo na njegovem premoženju zaradi dolga za sodne stroške. Pravnik Miha Juhart je opozoril, da izvršba pomeni prodajo deleža v podjetju, ne pa prevzem lastništva. Mesec pa je že v prvem odzivu pojasnil, da izvršbe ne bo uveljavil. Juhart je dodal, da bo verjetno direktor podjetja predlagal stečaj, če Snežič ne dokapitalizira podjetja. V primeru, ko ne bo predložena izvršba ali stečaj, lahko vsak upnik predlaga stečajni postopek.
Bias read (Center): The article presents legal and financial information regarding a private individual's business dealings and potential insolvency proceedings. It includes perspectives from both the individual involved and a legal expert, providing balanced views without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains
The article discusses the failure of the business firm Progros and criticizes politician Boris Mijič for his handling of the situation. It highlights how Mijič claimed responsibility publicly but avoided personal financial accountability, leaving debts unpaid to workers and the state while remaining in parliament. The piece suggests that the issue reflects a broader problem of who bears the cost of decisions in Slovenia, with citizens, workers, and taxpayers ending up paying the price rather than those in leadership positions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of politician Boris Mijič in a critical light, suggesting he evades personal responsibility by using public platforms to claim accountability while avoiding financial consequences. The tone implies a critique of political leaders prioritizing their positions over moral
The article discusses a situation where Luka Mesec, a Slovenian politician, publicly expressed his desire to gain experience in business after winning a legal case against Rok Snežič. His wish has now come true in an unexpected manner. Boris Mijić, a member of parliament, transferred his struggling company Progros to Snežič for free. Snežič renamed the company to 'Klukec' (a play on Mesec's name) and added camel breeding as a new activity, which has little competition in Slovenia. Snežič explained that he took over the company to allow Mesec to eventually become the owner through a transitional phase. Mesec criticized this as 'extremely poor sense of humor,' but the fact remains that he had publicly stated his intention to become a business owner. Legal experts have criticized the transfer as a form of abuse of legal entities and warned of potential legal consequences. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the transfer and its implications for accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a politically motivated maneuver by politicians to avoid responsibility, highlighting the misuse of legal entities and the lack of accountability. It emphasizes the public statement by Mesec and criticizes the actions of Mijić and Snežič as a form of evasion, with
Predsednik Notarske zbornice Slovenije Bojan Podgoršek je dejal, da je notar pri prenosu poslovnega deleža podjetja Progros s poslanca Resnice Borisa Mijiča na Roka Snežiča ne mogel odkloniti sestave notarskega zapisa, ker so bili pogoji za to neizpolnjeni in ni bil storjen noben nemoralen dejanje. Podgoršek je pojasnil, da je prenos urejen v zakonu o gospodarskih družbah, ki predstavlja eno najstrožjih v Evropi, in da notar ima preventivno funkcijo, ki vključuje pregled določenih pogojev. Natančne razlage je podrobno razvil, kot so omejitve, preverjanje v sodnem registru, ter definicija fiktivnega posla. Tudi glede premoženja podjetja je poudaril, da prenos ne vpliva na upnike, njihov položaj se ne poslabša.
Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja objektivno razlago notarskega procesa pri prenosu poslovnega deleža, brez evidentnega političnega slanja ali preferenc. Vsebinske informacije so osnovane na zakonskih predpisih in profesionalnih razlagah, kar kaže na neutralnost. Ne obstaja jasna tendencija v izboru izvorov ali p
On July 24, 2026, Slovenian Minister of Economy, Labour, and Sport Anže Logar criticized the transfer of the company Progros from MP Boris Mijič of the Freedom Party to Rok Snežič, describing it as a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions. Logar stated this action reflects a poor sense of humor and indicates dysfunction within the legal state. He emphasized the need for strict anti-corruption measures, reducing waiting lists in healthcare, and improving labor protections. The ministry reiterated its stance against any circumvention of legislation and unethical practices, calling for stronger legal frameworks to protect workers and ensure effective oversight by relevant authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of Progros as a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions, using strong negative language ('norčevanje', 'nedelovanje pravne države') and emphasizes anti-corruption and worker protection policies typically associated with leftist agendas. The tone criticizes a右
The article discusses the legal implications of transferring ownership of the insolvent company Progros from Boris Mijič to Rok Snežič. It explains that while the change in ownership does not affect the company’s obligations or its ability to meet debts, the transfer could be problematic if it is intended to evade responsibility rather than resolve the company's financial issues. Legal experts clarify that the company remains responsible for its debts, and both previous and current management bodies share responsibility for managing insolvency. The article highlights concerns that such transfers might be used to avoid accountability.
Bias read (Center): While the article touches on legal and economic matters related to corporate insolvency, which can have political implications, the framing remains balanced by presenting expert opinions from both legal perspectives without overtly favoring any particular political stance. The focus is on legal and財
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive3 days ago
In July 2026, Minister for Economy, Labour, and Sport Anže Logar agreed with former Labour Minister Luka Mesec that the transfer of insolvent company Progros from Boris Mijič to tax advisor Rok Snežič was a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions. The company, which owes at least €10,000 to employees and €30,000 to the state, was renamed Klukec and registered as a camel breeding business. This move has been criticized as a legal and ethical violation, undermining trust in the state. Logar emphasized the need for strict anti-corruption measures, reducing waiting times in healthcare, and protecting workers' rights. The Ministry of Labour condemned any manipulation of legislation and unethical behavior, stressing the importance of equal application of the law.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a mockery of workers and state institutions, criticizes the transfer of the company as unethical, and emphasizes the need for anti-corruption measures, stronger worker protections, and improved governance. These points align with progressive values such as holding
Minister za gospodarstvo, delo in šport Anže Logar je na družbenem omrežju X odgovoril na kritiko, ki jo je izrazil Luka Mesec glede brezplačnega prenosa podjetja Progros poslanca Resnice Borisa Mijiča na Roka Snežiča. Logar je ocenil, da gre za 'norčevanje iz neplačanih delavcev' in 'nedelovanje pravne države', kar pomeni, da se ne izpolnjujejo dogovorni obvezavitvi med delavci in podjetjem. Njegova izjava je bila v kontekstu debat o pravni državi, korupciji in zaščiti delavcev. Poslanska skupina stranke Demokrati je izrazila upanje, da bo opozicija v naslednjem koraku delovala bolj konstruktivno. Na ministrstvu so poudarili pomembnost pravnih okvirjev za varstvo delavcev in učinkovitost institucij, kot je inšpektorat za delo.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel ima levičarski okvir, ker kritizira 'norčevanje' in 'nedelovanje pravne države', kar je pogosto levičarska teza. Tudi izjava, da je 'skok še bolj potreben', in poudarek na zaščiti delavcev in pravni državi, so elementi, ki se pogosto pojavljajo v levičarski politiki. Poudarek na korupciji in
The article discusses a controversy involving Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, who was at the center of an affair regarding unpaid obligations to his company Progros' employees and the state. Mijič allegedly gifted his company to businessman Rok Snežič, who decided to take over the business because Luka Mesec, a coordinator of the Left Party, has legal authority over Snežič's assets. Mesec criticized the move as absurd and called for those who find it funny to imagine being in the position of workers not paid by Mijič. Mesec emphasized that this is not about left or right but about whether we allow fraud, lies, and violence to become values. He stated he would not enforce legal actions against Snežič's new company, citing ongoing lawsuits and financial issues. Minister Anže Logar, leader of the Democratic Party, condemned the situation as mockery of workers and state institutions, highlighting the erosion of trust in the rule of law.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a critique of political figures like Mijič and Mesec, emphasizing the misuse of power and the failure of institutional accountability. While both politicians are mentioned, the narrative leans toward condemning the actions of Mijič and supporting Mesec's stance on the
The article discusses the transfer of ownership of the Progros company from MP Boris Mijič to Rok Snežič, which was previously renamed Klukec, a company involved in animal breeding. Snežič confirmed the transfer and stated he took over the company intentionally to allow former Minister for Labour Luka Mesec to potentially acquire it based on a legal decision regarding enforcement. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) clarified that while the change in ownership structure occurred, the company remains a debtor and its existence and ability to meet obligations remain unaffected. In response, Mesec denied plans to take over the company, and parliamentary groups 'Gibanje Svoboda' and SD expressed concern about the situation of employees.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of ownership as a strategic move by Snežič to facilitate potential acquisition by a former minister, implying political maneuvering. It highlights concerns raised by parliamentary groups about employee welfare, suggesting a focus on social implications. While not ideo
The article discusses the financial maneuvering of Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, who transferred ownership of his company Progros to Rok Snežič without paying off debts owed to creditors. The article quotes Katja Kokot, leader of Mijič’s political party, who comments on the move. Kokot states that Mijič has not eliminated the debts but has legally transferred them to the new owner, Snežič. She emphasizes that the debts remain tied to the company and that the new owner, Snežič, has publicly stated he intends to pursue legal action against Mijič for unpaid debts. Kokot supports the legality of the transfer but expresses concern over the potential impact on creditors. The article also mentions that Snežič changed the company name and activities, and Kokot suggests that while some workers have been paid, others still await resolution.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue by quoting Kokot's concerns about the debt situation and her support for the legal transfer. It does not overtly favor one political stance over another, maintaining a balanced approach between the actions of Mijič and the implications for creditors. The
The article discusses the actions of MP Boris Mijić from the party Resnica, who transferred his debt-ridden company Progros to Rok Snežič, a member of the opposition party Levica. Instead of paying back debts to the state and employees, Mijić moved the company under Snežič's ownership, which then changed the company's main activity to camel breeding. This move was intended to evade legal responsibility for unpaid wages and court costs owed to another politician, Luka Mescu. Legal expert Dr. Rajko Pirnat comments that despite selling the company, Mijić cannot avoid liability for debts to workers, and there is likely to be a review of the company's legal entity. He warns that this could constitute a gift violating integrity laws and criticizes the ruling coalition for failing to condemn such behavior publicly.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of politicians as unethical and highlights criticism of the ruling coalition for not condemning these behaviors. The emphasis is on accountability and integrity, aligning with left-leaning values. The legal expert's critique of the ruling coalition suggests a leftward傾
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive4 days ago
In an interview on RTV Slovenija, sindicalist Goran Lukić and lawyer Miha Juhart discuss the controversial transfer of ownership of the Progros company by MP Boris Mijič. Mijič transferred the company, which is owned entirely by him, to his tax advisor Rok Snežič for free, with plans to eventually have the company end up under the control of Left-wing coordinator Luke Mesc. Lukić expresses outrage over the situation, calling it beyond human intelligence and noting that Mijič’s company still owes 37,000 euros to a cooperator. He emphasizes the broader implications for workers and creditors, stating that the actions have been carried out in a manner that is both public and unlawful. Lawyer Juhart explains that transferring shares in a limited liability company does not change the legal position of claims against the company, and that all creditors remain unpaid. He notes that while the owner can freely dispose of their share, the law is strict regarding who can be a shareholder.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of MP Boris Mijič in a highly negative light, emphasizing the ethical and legal implications of transferring company ownership for personal gain. The language used by Lukić suggests strong criticism of Mijič’s behavior, implying corruption or misuse of power. While the
Poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič je podjetje Progros brezplačno prenestel Roki Snežiču, kar je sledilo spremembi imena podjetja v Klukec in spremembi glavne dejavnosti v rejo kamel. Snežič je objasnil, da je to storil, ker ima poslanec Levice Luka Mesec pravnomočno izvršbo na njegovem premoženju, kar bi lahko pomenilo, da Mesec dostopa do njegovega premoženja. Snežič meni, da je ta manever izziv za Mesca, ki kandidiira za ljubljanskega župana, da dokaze svojo sposobnost. Medtem, ko Mijič ostaja dolžan delavcem in državi, je bil Mesec enega najboljših kritikov Mijiča, kar je povzročilo zahteve za njegovo odstopitev. Mijič je zatrdil, da bo do konca leta poplačal svoje dolgove in sodeluje pri spremembah zakonodaje.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of Progros from Mijič to Snežič as a strategic move by Snežič to challenge Luka Mesec, who is portrayed as a critic of Mijič. The narrative emphasizes Mesec’s role as a legitimate critic and highlights Mijič’s financial mismanagement and legal issues, which aligns a左翼
The article discusses a political controversy involving Slovenian politicians Boris Mijič and Roko Snežič, who gifted their company Progros to each other for free. In response, Left Party MP Luka Mesec criticized the situation, calling it a poor sense of humor and questioning whether workers and shareholders feel comfortable being treated as fools in this manner. Mesec argues that the actions reflect a broader issue of allowing fraud, lies, and manipulation to become values, transcending traditional left-right divisions. Meanwhile, Snežič explains his decision to rename the company to Klukec and shift its focus to camel breeding, stating he allowed Mesec to access his assets due to Mesec’s legal authority over his wealth. This follows a past lawsuit where Mesec was ordered to pay legal fees after losing a case against Snežič.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Mijič and Snežič as a form of corporate manipulation and hypocrisy, aligning with left-wing critiques of economic inequality and unethical business practices. Mesec’s criticism emphasizes moral and ethical concerns, which resonate with leftist values. The emphasison
Rok Snežič je izgubil dve tožbi proti Luki Mescu, kar je povzročilo pravnomočno izvršbo na njegovo podjetje Snežič d.o.o. Boris Mijič je svoje podjetje Progros brezplačno podaril Snežiču, kar je bil notarsko overjen. Snežič je podjetje preimenoval v Klukec d.o.o. in registriral novo glavno dejavnost. Mijič je obljubil, da bo podjetje poplačalo dolge do delavcev, vendar je bil njegov novi direktor Admirj Kamerić, ki ima prebivališče v Bosni in Hercegovini. Mesec kritizira Smisel za humor Mijiča in Snežiča ter opozori na stanje delavcev, ki jih Mijič ne plačuje. Mesec meni, da se ne moreme več govoriti o političnih strankah, ampak o vrednotah, kot so prava, resnost in moral.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič in a manner that emphasizes their financial struggles and legal battles, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that often highlight systemic issues and corporate responsibility. The narrative suggests that Mijič’s failure to pay his欠
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FTULFO_ULET.mp4.00_03_26_16.Still001.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
