Janša on the appointment of MP Mijić: It's a small thing
On July 26, 2026, Slovenian Prime Minister and SDS leader Janez Janša commented on the controversy involving Resnica MP Boris Mijič, who gifted his indebted company Progros to Rok Snežič. While acknowledging the issue as problematic, Janša described it as relatively minor compared to other political matters, such as delays in implementing the intervention law. He suggested this story would not dominate headlines if the constitutional court did not soon decide on the referendum’s validity, which could block legislative plans. Meanwhile, Resnica leader Zoran Stevanović criticized Mijič for misleading voters on financial matters, education, and labor practices, stating he had crossed ethical boundaries. Stevanović noted that Mijič would lose his parliamentary seat by October unless Resnica faces mandatory by-elections. The article explains that under electoral law, if a member resigns after six months in office, their seat automatically transfers to the next candidate on the same party list. However, if they resign earlier, the party loses the mandate and must hold new elections.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses the ongoing scandal involving Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič from the party Resnica, who continues to face scandals despite public pressure. Coalition parties refuse to comment on the matter, and parliamentary speaker Zoran Stevanović is protecting his colleague, planning to propose Mijič’s expulsion from the party after summer holidays but not pressing him to resign as a parliamentarian. If Mijič resigns before October 10th, early elections would be held in his constituency, potentially affecting Resnica’s parliamentary representation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of political culture, implying that Mijič's behavior reflects systemic issues within the political system. The emphasis on the potential impact on Resnica's parliamentary seats suggests a concern over the integrity of the political process, aligning more
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source, including the confirmation from the faculty and the internal party response. It maintains consistency with the reported facts and adds context about the political implications.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but leans towards criticizing the party for protecting Mijič, which introduces a slight bias.
Gorenjski glasIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6510 days ago
The article discusses allegations against Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič regarding his educational background. Media reports suggest that Mijič has been misleading about his qualifications, claiming he is a civil engineering graduate when records show otherwise. The Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG) does not list him as a graduate, nor is his thesis available in public databases. In response, Resnica party leader Zoran Stevanović stated he was first made aware of this issue and plans to propose the strictest measures against Mijič, potentially including expulsion from the party. He emphasized that such decisions rest with the party’s organs and expects a meeting of the party council after parliamentary recess. The article also mentions Premier Janez Janša's visit to Kyiv for Ukrainian independence celebrations, where he praised Ukraine's resilience against Russian aggression and reiterated support for Ukraine's EU membership aspirations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the allegations against Mijič and the party leader's planned response without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information about the controversy but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains balanced between the claims against Mijič and
Why factuality (80): The article confirms the allegations against Mijič through multiple sources including the faculty and media outlets. It provides details about his claimed education versus actual records, aligning with cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (65): While factual, the tone leans towards criticism of Mijič, using phrases like 'zavajal' and emphasizing the political fallout, showing some editorializing.
ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 306 days ago
The Slovenian political landscape has been shaken by revelations of corruption within the Resnica party, led by Zoran Janša. The scandal involves Zoran Stevanović, a problematic MP known for his controversial behavior, whose actions have forced the party into crisis. With parliamentary recesses beginning, the party is trying to delay addressing the issue until after the break, when internal decision-making bodies reconvene. The situation is seen as critical, with potential consequences including Stevanović’s expulsion from the party and possibly from the parliamentary group. The article suggests that while the party might attempt to manage the fallout through carefully crafted narratives, the damage to its reputation could be significant.
Bias read (Progressive): The article uses strong, critical language toward the ruling party (Resnica) and its leader Zoran Janša, accusing them of institutionalized lies and corruption. It frames the situation as a crisis for the party and highlights the need for accountability, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective.
Why factuality (65): The article makes specific claims about Zoran Stevanović and his alleged misconduct, but does not provide concrete evidence or sources to back these allegations. While there may be a general consensus among other media outlets regarding the nature of the issue, this particular article lacks detailed
Why objectivity (30): The article uses highly charged and emotionally loaded language such as 'lump', 'malopriden', and 'gnilega jajca' to describe Stevanović and his actions. It also frames the situation in a strongly biased manner, portraying the political party as corrupt and implying guilt without providing balanced
The article reports on allegations of financial misconduct involving Boris Mijič and his former company Progros. It claims that after Mijič faced significant difficulties, Rok Snežič provided assistance by renaming the company to 'Novo necenzurirano d.o.o.' This action allegedly prevented a court ruling against Mijič. The article cites internal documents obtained by 'necenzurirano.si' suggesting that Snežič later renamed the company to 'Klukec' and promoted a narrative attributing this change to Luke Mesic. The piece further alleges that both Mijič and Snežič have been implicated in financial irregularities, including owing thousands of euros to employees and the state. The article also questions the credibility of legal documentation surrounding the transfer of ownership, noting that the notary, Mojca Tavčar Pasar, was not informed of all relevant circumstances and did not detect any signs of wrongdoing. The report raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the lack of transparency in the transaction.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič in a manner that suggests a cover-up or deliberate misrepresentation of financial dealings. It emphasizes the involvement of high-profile figures and highlights potential corruption or misuse of power. The tone leans toward exposing what's
On July 26, 2026, Slovenian Prime Minister and SDS leader Janez Janša commented on the controversy involving Resnica MP Boris Mijič, who gifted his indebted company Progros to Rok Snežič. While acknowledging the issue as problematic, Janša described it as relatively minor compared to other political matters, such as delays in implementing the intervention law. He suggested this story would not dominate headlines if the constitutional court did not soon decide on the referendum’s validity, which could block legislative plans. Meanwhile, Resnica leader Zoran Stevanović criticized Mijič for misleading voters on financial matters, education, and labor practices, stating he had crossed ethical boundaries. Stevanović noted that Mijič would lose his parliamentary seat by October unless Resnica faces mandatory by-elections. The article explains that under electoral law, if a member resigns after six months in office, their seat automatically transfers to the next candidate on the same party list. However, if they resign earlier, the party loses the mandate and must hold new elections.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Janša’s comments in a manner that frames the Mijič affair as trivial compared to larger political issues, emphasizing the importance of the intervention law and constitutional court decisions. This framing suggests a prioritization of broader political concerns over individualMP
The article discusses concerns raised by Predrag Resnic's president, Zoran Stevanović, regarding his party member Boris Mijič, who does not align with the party's values. The article mentions that Mijič will remain in the party until October 10th. The piece references a source from TVSLO but provides limited additional information.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral observation about a party member's alignment with the party's values without overtly favoring any side. It includes a reference to a source but does not exhibit clear bias through language or framing.
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik stranke Resni.ca in predsednik parlamenta, je izrazil svoj šok zaradi dejanj poslancega Boris Mijiča, ki je prenesel svoje insolventno podjetje Progros na Roka Snežiča, kar je povzročilo večje finansijsne težave za delavce. Stevanović je poudaril, da Mijič prestopi meje in da ne sme biti v parlamentu, vendar stranka ne more takoj izbrisati njegovega mandata, ker bi tako izgubila mandat več tisoč volivcev. Mijič je tudi zavajal glede svoje izobrazbe in finančnega položaja. Predsednik vlade Janez Janša je oglasil svojo oceno, da gre za napačne stvari, vendar jih oceni kot manj pomembne v primerjavi z drugimi aktualnostmi.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Zoran Stevanović and Janez Janša regarding Boris Mijič's actions, providing their perspectives without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the reported facts and quotes rather than taking a clear ideological stance.
The article discusses the reactions to the Slovenian company Klukec d.o.o., which was created by transferring Boris Mijič’s company Progros to tax advisor Rok Snežič. The rebranding included adding 'rejo camels' as a registered activity, which Snežič claimed was a political provocation linked to Leftist coordinator Luka Mesec. Responses ranged from criticism, including condemnation from Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Council and party Resnica, to humorous and supportive comments from various individuals and politicians. The article also mentions Tadej Pogačar breaking a record at the Tour de France.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič as politically motivated, linking them to Leftist figures like Luka Mesec. While the article presents both critical and positive responses, the emphasis on the political implications and the support from Left-aligned figures (such as AstaV
The article discusses a political controversy involving Slavko Stevanović, leader of the Slovenian political party Resnica, and his criticism of Borislav Mijič, a member of parliament. Stevanović accuses Mijič of being entrusted with the candidacy of a dishonest individual and criticizes him for mishandling financial matters related to the insolvent company Progros. He claims that Mijič used the party’s resources behind their backs and has caused harm to workers. Stevanović states that the party will take all necessary political steps to ensure Mijič is no longer a representative of the party starting in October. The article also mentions potential legal implications if Mijič resigns before the halfway mark of the parliamentary term, which could result in the loss of a mandate and the need for by-elections. Additionally, Prime Minister Janez Janša comments on the situation, calling it a matter of incorrect actions but downplaying its significance compared to other issues. The opposition leader Anže Logar reacts critically to the situation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of ethical responsibility and accountability within a political party, emphasizing the moral failure of Mijič and the need for corrective action. The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by highlighting systemic failures and the importanceof
The Slovenian politician Zoran Stevanović, president of the Resnica party, has strongly criticized Borisa Mijič, a member of parliament and owner of the insolvent company Progros. Stevanović accuses Mijič of unpaid debts to employees, false claims about his education, and transferring the insolvent business to another individual, Rok Snežič. The party plans to demand Mijič’s resignation by October 10th, after which his parliamentary mandate would automatically transfer to the next candidate from the same party. Stevanović emphasizes that Mijič has crossed a moral boundary and demands accountability, including repayment of debts to workers. He also mentions that he personally covered some of the debts from his own pocket. Mijič transferred his insolvent company to Snežič, who renamed it as a livestock business, while Mijič still owes over €10,000 to employees and significant taxes.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a moral failure and betrayal of voters by Mijič, using strong language like 'mejo dokončno prestopil' (crossed the line completely) and 'zaupali smo napačnemu človeku' (we trusted the wrong person). It highlights the party's commitment to values and accountability, as
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive2 days ago
The article reports on a controversy involving Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliament representing the Resni.c party, who transferred his insolvent company Progros to another individual, Rok Snežič. The transfer was criticized by Resni.c leader Zoran Stevanović, who accused Mijič of misleading the public regarding financial matters and treating employees poorly by transferring the non-liquid company. Stevanović stated that the party will take action against Mijič in October, after six months since the current parliamentary session began, to ensure the mandate is passed to the next candidate. The article explains that under Slovenian election law, if a member resigns before six months, the party loses its mandate unless they hold replacement elections. Stevanović emphasized that the party’s mandate belongs to thousands of voters who supported their program, not just Mijič.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of ethical responsibility and accountability within the political sphere. It emphasizes the betrayal of public trust by Mijič, portrays him as having misled constituents and employees, and positions the party's actions as defending democratic values and恪
Zoran Stevanović, vodja politične stranke Resnica, je v objavi na platformi X izjavil, da Boris Mijič, trenutni poslanec, 'mejo dokončno prestopil' in da ne sme več biti poslanec. Mijič je po Stevanovićevih besedah zavajal glede svojih finančnih poslov, izobrazbe in obravnave delavcev, kar vključuje prenos nelikvidnega podjetja Progros na drugo podjetje. Stevanović je poudaril, da Mijič ne more biti izbran izmed volivcev, ker bi Resnica izgubila mandat, ki je pripadel več tisoč volivcem. Ključni datum za odstop Mijiča je 10. oktober, saj bo poteklo več kot šest mesecev od ustanovitvene seje parlamenta. Mijič ima velike dolgove do delavcev, Finančne uprave in kooperantov podjetja. Stevanović je napovedal, da bo predlagal najstrožje ukrepe proti Mijiču, vključno z izključitvijo iz stranke.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from Zoran Stevanović, leader of the political party Resnica, regarding Boris Mijič's alleged misconduct. The framing is neutral, presenting both accusations against Mijič and explanations from Stevanović without overtly favoring one side. There is no clear bias in ph
The article discusses the political fallout surrounding Boris Mijić, a Slovenian parliament member who has been accused of financial misconduct and misleading constituents. Stevanović, a representative from the Resnica party, claims that Mijić has crossed a line by misrepresenting his financial status, educational background, and treating workers disrespectfully. He asserts that Mijić’s actions threaten the credibility of the party and demands accountability. The article outlines potential consequences if Mijić fails to address these issues, including public exposure and possible legal action. It also mentions that if Mijić resigns before October 10th, special elections would need to be held, which could impact the party’s parliamentary representation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Mijić’s actions as a betrayal of public trust and emphasizes the moral responsibility of politicians. The language used by Stevanović carries a strong ethical judgment against Mijić, portraying him as a dishonest figure who has undermined the party’s values. While the article does
Poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič, ki je v začetku leta zagotovil, da bo poplačal svoje dolgove, je namesto tega podaril svoje insolventno podjetje Progros Roki Snežiču, ki je spremenil ime podjetja v Klukec in glavno dejavnost v rejo kamel. To je povzročilo kritike, posebej od šefa stranke Zorana Stevanovića, ki je poudaril, da Mijič nima več moralne pravice biti poslanec. Stevanović je povedal, da bodo izvedli vse potrebne korake, da Mijič oktobra ne bo več poslanec, vendar ne morejo takoj ukrepati zaradi zakonodaje, saj bi tako izgubili mandat. Mijiča pa še vedno ni pozvali k odstopu.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the actions of Boris Mijič and the reactions from Zoran Stevanović and others, providing a balanced view of the situation without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from multiple perspectives and explains the legal implications of Mijič’s potential resignation.
Premier Janez Janša je na srečanju članstva Stranke Slovenije (SDS) v Bovcu ocenil, da so za njimi bili pestri meseci, ki bodo tudi prihodnji, posebej ob lokalnih volitvah in referendumih. Predstavil je SDS kot ključno silo za reševanje demografskih izzivov, ki po njegovem mnenju predstavljajo večjo preprečeno vprašanje kot samo volitve. Janša je kritiziral uporabo sredstev RTVS, kar je primerjal z financiranjem znanstvenih raziskav, in ugotovil, da gre za nepopolitiziranje javnih institucij. Poleg tega je komentiral afero s podjetjem Progros, kjer je poslanec Resnice Borisa Mijič neplačal obveznosti, in opozoril na potrebo po hitrem ukrepu proti interventnemu zakonu.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikel je postavljal nasprotje med političnim delom in ne-politiziranimi institucijami, kar je pogosto značilno za desničarsko pozicijo. Kritika RTVS in poudarek na demografskih izzivih ter povezava s podporo SDS kot sile za narodno identiteto kažejo na desničarsko okvirsko izbiranje. Tudi komentar
Predsednik resnicke stranke Zoran Stevanović je dejal, da poslanec Boris Mijić ni več dovoljen v Resnici, ker je 'prestopil mejo' s svojimi dejanji. Stevanović navaja različne primeri, kot so neplačanje dolgov podjetjem, neznanje o Mijićevi izobrazbi in prenos nelikvidnega podjetja brez njegovega vedenja. Pričakuje, da Mijić do konca oktobra ne bo več poslanec stranke, in mu zahteva, naj poravnava obveznosti do delavcev in prevzame odgovornost. Stevanović poudarja, da je to storjeno 'za hrbtom', kar je šokiralo, in meni, da Mijić 'nima moralne pravice sedeti v Državnem zboru'.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikel uporablja strogo kritično besedilo proti poslancu Mijiću, kar kaže na desno politično naklonjenost. Izrazi kot 'prestopil mejo', 'za hrbtom' in 'nima moralne pravice' so pogosto povezani z desno politično perspektivo. Prizoriščo nasprotje med Resnico in drugimi strankami (SDS ali Svoboda), k
The article discusses a political conflict between Luka Mesec, a coordinator for the Left Party in Slovenia, and Rok Snežič, a former member of the Resnica party. Mesec had previously criticized Snežič as a criminal, leading to a legal dispute where Mesec won a lawsuit against Snežič, who was unable to pay the court costs due to lack of financial resources. In retaliation, Snežič took over Mesec’s former employer, Progros, renamed it Klukec, and changed its activity to camel breeding. This move was seen as a strategic attempt to undermine Mesec by giving him a 'business opportunity' through the new company. However, the article notes that Snežič's wife is the actual owner of the company, making it unlikely that Mesec could acquire it. The renaming of the company to Klukec, which rhymes with Mesec's name, and the introduction of camel farming were interpreted as sarcastic and politically motivated actions, highlighting the ongoing political rivalry between the parties involved.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a political maneuvering where Rok Snežič, representing the opposition, uses a business takeover as a form of retaliation against Luka Mesec, a member of the Left Party. The tone suggests that Snežič's actions are politically motivated and intended to undermine Mes
The article features an interview with Miran Videtič, a seasoned political commentator, who evaluates the first steps of the new Janša-led government following March elections. He compares their actions to those of the previous Golob coalition, criticizing the latter's 'sectarian transactional politics' and highlighting the need for systemic reforms across various sectors. Videtič points out significant personnel changes in public institutions and criticizes the influence of personal interests in decision-making, particularly referencing Zoran Janković as a major political fraud. The discussion includes concerns over potential polarization due to staff changes and calls for transparency and accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the previous government and its leadership (notably Zoran Janković) as politically motivated and dishonest, using strong language like 'prevara' (fraud) and 'pajdaško kadrovanje' (clique-based appointments). It emphasizes the need for reform and accountability, a左
The article discusses the failure of the business firm Progros and criticizes politician Boris Mijič for his handling of the situation. It highlights how Mijič claimed responsibility publicly but avoided personal financial accountability, leaving debts unpaid to workers and the state while remaining in parliament. The piece suggests that the issue reflects a broader problem of who bears the cost of decisions in Slovenia, with citizens, workers, and taxpayers ending up paying the price rather than those in leadership positions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of politician Boris Mijič in a critical light, suggesting he evades personal responsibility by using public platforms to claim accountability while avoiding financial consequences. The tone implies a critique of political leaders prioritizing their positions over moral
The article discusses a situation where Luka Mesec, a Slovenian politician, publicly expressed his desire to gain experience in business after winning a legal case against Rok Snežič. His wish has now come true in an unexpected manner. Boris Mijić, a member of parliament, transferred his struggling company Progros to Snežič for free. Snežič renamed the company to 'Klukec' (a play on Mesec's name) and added camel breeding as a new activity, which has little competition in Slovenia. Snežič explained that he took over the company to allow Mesec to eventually become the owner through a transitional phase. Mesec criticized this as 'extremely poor sense of humor,' but the fact remains that he had publicly stated his intention to become a business owner. Legal experts have criticized the transfer as a form of abuse of legal entities and warned of potential legal consequences. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the transfer and its implications for accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a politically motivated maneuver by politicians to avoid responsibility, highlighting the misuse of legal entities and the lack of accountability. It emphasizes the public statement by Mesec and criticizes the actions of Mijić and Snežič as a form of evasion, with
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FTULFO_ULET.mp4.00_03_26_16.Still001.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
