N1 SrbijaIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 603 days agoPredsednik Srbija centra Zdravko Ponoš je optužio javnog tužioca Vladimira Živkovića za prekršaj zakona, navodeći da je Živković dopustio policiji da dostavi službenu belešku razgovora sa Ponošem Informeru bez odgoda. Ponoš je takođe pitanje postavio u vezi sa upotrebom zvučnog topa, navodeći da on tvrdi da je top bio korišćen, dok je predsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić tvrdio suprotno. Ponoš je dodao da Vučić i njegova ekipa više puta slagali u vezi sa tom temom, a da je ministar unutrašnjih poslova Branko Đuričić naredio blokiranje određenog moda na uređaju nakon 15. marta. Više javnog tužilaštva je negodovalo nad javnim targetiranjem postupajućeg javnog tužioca od strane političara, navodeći da je tvrdnja o upotrebi zvučnog topa mogla izazvati paniku i nered.
Bias read (Left): The article presents accusations against a public prosecutor by a political figure, questioning the legality of actions taken under his orders and challenging the official narrative regarding the use of a sound cannon. The framing emphasizes legal violations and challenges to authority, suggesting a
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): The article presents Ponoš’s allegations against the Public Prosecutor Vladimir Živković and mentions specific legal provisions (Article 43). It references a claimed monopoly on truth by Vučić and questions the use of sound cannons, but lacks direct evidence or primary sources. The tone suggests pol
N1 SrbijaIndependentLeftFactual 75Objective 553 days ago VJT "najoštrije negoduje" kada Ponoš otkrije ime tužioca, ali ćuti kada iskaz završi u InformeruThe article discusses the actions of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Serbia regarding the case involving the use of a sound cannon during a protest. The focus is on the interrogation of Zdravko Ponoš, leader of the Srbija Centar party, who was questioned about his presence at the protest. The VJT strongly criticized Ponoš for publicly naming the prosecutor involved in the case, but did not react similarly when the content of the interrogation was later broadcast by the Informer tabloid. Ponoš accused the prosecutor Vladimir Živković of legal violations for allowing police officers to provide a statement about their conversation with him to the Informer shortly after he signed it. The VJT has been increasingly critical of various claims made about its work over the past year, particularly those related to the 'sound cannon' case, which led to a series of interrogations.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the VJT's actions as politically motivated, suggesting they are being used for political purposes. It highlights criticism from Ponoš against the prosecutors and implies that the VJT is acting selectively, criticizing Ponoš for revealing the prosecutor's identity but remaining unv
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): This article reports on the public prosecutor’s response to Ponoš’s statements, highlighting perceived politicization of the case. While it includes quotes from both sides, it frames the situation as an attempt by the prosecutor to counter political influence, introducing potential bias.
Serbia
