The PM: 'It's normal that a man has to overcome some resistance to sex.'
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
left
center
right
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
In 2021, a prosecutor in Benevento requested the dismissal of a domestic violence case against a man, citing the idea that men might need to overcome a woman’s resistance during sexual encounters, which was later revealed by Il Fatto Quotidiano. This statement led to a European Court of Human Rights (Cedu) ruling that condemned Italy for failing to properly handle the case, violating the rights to privacy and protection from inhumane treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights. The victim, Audrey Ubeda, along with her two children, has been awarded €15,000 each in compensation. The court criticized the prosecutor's sexist and stereotypical remarks, noting they contributed to the normalization of domestic violence and secondary victimization of survivors. The judges emphasized that Italian authorities failed to recognize the complex mechanisms of domestic abuse and did not make serious efforts to understand the complainants' situation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's findings and criticisms objectively, quoting the Cedu's statements and the concerns raised by the Council of Europe's expert group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but rather reports on the legal and social implications of the case.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the European Court of Human Rights ruling against Italy over the sexist remarks by a prosecutor. It provides details about the case, including the victim’s background and the financial penalties. However, the tone leans slightly towards criticizing Italian judicial pra
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the Italian justice system, highlighting sexist attitudes among prosecutors and the broader implications for victims of domestic violence. While the subject involves legal procedures, the emphasis on gender-based discrimination and the call-f
The Italian justice system has been condemned by the European Court of Human Rights for failing to adequately protect a woman accused of experiencing domestic violence and her two children. The court criticized both the handling of the case and specific remarks made by prosecutors during the investigation. The case involves Audrey Carmen Manuela Ubeda, a French citizen living in Italy, who reported repeated physical and psychological abuse by her ex-partner, the father of her two children. After her report in April 2021, she and her children were placed in a protected shelter for over three years until July 2024. The court highlighted that the prosecutor’s comments, which referred to the alleged victim’s resistance as 'normal,' reflected sexist stereotypes and contributed to secondary victimization. The ruling also pointed out that while authorities acted quickly initially, the overall investigation did not meet international standards for addressing domestic violence.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the criticism of the Italian judicial system as a broader issue of gender-based discrimination and institutional failure to protect women. It emphasizes the sexist nature of the prosecutors' remarks and highlights systemic issues within the legal framework, aligning more closely с
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Italy
