ON
← Back to feed
The demographics of the EU
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/15/2026

The demographics of the EU

The European Commission has published its third demographic report, highlighting ongoing population decline across the EU while noting increasing life expectancy. The report states that the EU's population peaked at 450.6 million in 2026 but is projected to fall to 445 million by 2050 and further to 398.8 million by 2100, a decrease of 11.7%. Life expectancy is expected to rise significantly, reaching 90 years for women and 86 years for men by 2100. By 2050, nearly one-third of the EU’s population will be aged 65 or older, compared to one-fifth today. The aging population presents challenges such as labor market pressures, public finances, and healthcare systems, with the number of people needing care expected to rise from 36 to 48 million by 2070. The report suggests measures like enabling older citizens to remain active in the workforce longer, boosting productivity through innovation and AI, and creating new markets for products and services tailored to older adults. European Commissioner Dubravka Šuica emphasized the need to transform these demographic changes into opportunities.

More than half of young people in Slovenia do not believe they will be able to afford their own home, according to a recent international survey conducted by WIN Worldwide. The findings reveal a deep sense of pessimism among Slovenian youth regarding their future prospects, with 53 percent believing they will not be able to purchase property, compared to just 27 percent who think they can. This stark contrast highlights a growing disconnect between current economic realities and the aspirations of younger generations. The survey, which was carried out between November 2025 and February 2026, included responses from over 44,000 individuals across 44 countries. In Slovenia, the Institute Mediana collected data from a representative sample of 1,018 adults aged 18 to 24 through an online panel. According to the results, Slovenian youth are significantly more pessimistic about their future opportunities than their peers in other parts of Europe and the world. While 47 percent of global respondents believe their generation has more opportunities than their parents’, only 32 percent of Slovenians share this view. Conversely, 57 percent of Slovenian youth believe their generation has fewer opportunities than previous ones, far higher than the 35 percent figure observed among all adult residents in the country. This sentiment extends beyond housing affordability. When asked whether their generation has more, less, or the same number of opportunities as their parents’, 47 percent of global youth believe there are more opportunities, while 28 percent see fewer. In Slovenia, however, the situation is markedly different: 57 percent of young people feel their generation has fewer opportunities than their parents, and only 32 percent believe otherwise. This pessimism is even more pronounced than in neighboring countries such as Croatia and Serbia, where similar trends are evident. The issue of homeownership is particularly alarming. Globally, 56 percent of young people believe they will eventually be able to afford their own home, while 27 percent do not. In Europe, the optimism rate drops slightly to 41 percent, with 35 percent expressing doubt. However, in Slovenia, the numbers are far worse: only 27 percent of young people believe they will be able to buy a house, and 53 percent are convinced they won’t. These figures reflect a broader crisis of economic insecurity among young Slovenians, exacerbated by rising living costs, stagnant wages, and limited access to affordable housing. The implications of these findings extend beyond personal financial concerns. Many young Slovenians are increasingly considering relocation to other countries in search of better opportunities. According to the same survey, nearly 70 percent of Slovenian youth believe they would move abroad due to improved conditions elsewhere. This percentage is comparable to global and European averages, though it is notably higher than in Croatia, where 75 percent of young people consider moving, and in Serbia, where 86 percent are open to relocation. Such high levels of mobility suggest a growing disillusionment with the domestic job market and quality of life. The reasons behind this trend are multifaceted. One key factor is the lack of stable employment and income security. Many young Slovenians face uncertain working conditions, low wages, and long-term unemployment, making it difficult to plan for the future. According to reports from local media, the labor market in Slovenia is struggling with a shortage of skilled workers, yet many registered unemployed individuals lack the qualifications or skills required for available jobs. This mismatch between supply and demand creates a cycle of underemployment and frustration among young professionals. Another contributing factor is the increasing cost of living, particularly in urban areas. Housing prices have risen sharply, making it nearly impossible for young people to save enough for a down payment or rent a place to live. In addition, basic necessities such as food, transportation, and utilities have become more expensive, further straining household budgets. As a result, many young Slovenians find themselves trapped in a cycle of debt and financial instability, unable to achieve the level of independence they once envisioned. The situation is compounded by demographic challenges. Slovenia is facing a rapidly aging population, with the proportion of people over 65 years old set to increase significantly in the coming decades. This shift threatens to strain public services, including healthcare and social care systems, which are already under pressure. Young people, who are often the primary caregivers for elderly family members, are being forced to take on additional responsibilities, limiting their ability to focus on career development or personal goals. In response to these challenges, some organizations and advocacy groups have called for greater involvement of young people in decision-making processes. The Youth Council of Slovenia, for example, has urged policymakers to include youth voices in discussions about education, employment, and housing policies. They argue that meaningful participation is essential for creating solutions that address the unique needs and aspirations of young people. However, despite these calls, many young Slovenians feel ignored or excluded from political discourse, leading to a sense of alienation and disengagement. At the same time, some young people are taking matters into their own hands. Student unions and grassroots movements are organizing protests and campaigns to highlight issues such as wage stagnation, housing shortages, and educational inequality. These efforts aim to raise awareness and push for policy changes that could improve the lives of young Slovenians. However, the effectiveness of these initiatives remains to be seen, especially given the complex political landscape and the competing priorities of government officials. Ultimately, the findings of this survey underscore a critical challenge facing Slovenia’s youth: a growing gap between expectations and reality. With few opportunities for upward mobility, increasing economic uncertainty, and a lack of support structures, many young people are left feeling powerless and frustrated. Addressing these issues will require coordinated action from both the public and private sectors, as well as a commitment to investing in the future of the next generation. Until then, the outlook for young Slovenians remains bleak.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

Delo logoDeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 908/12/2026
Health is not an expense but a long-term investment

The article discusses the importance of viewing health not merely as a cost but as a long-term investment, based on insights from Prof. Dr. Jože Sambt from the University of Ljubljana’s Faculty of Economics. He emphasizes that demographic and health economists now consider 'healthy life expectancy', years lived without disability, not just overall lifespan. This has significant implications for both individuals and society. Sambt highlights the challenges posed by an aging population in Slovenia, noting that by 2050, the ratio of people over 65 to those in working age (20–64) will shift dramatically, from 38 to 58 per 100 people. This trend, driven by post-war baby boom generations entering retirement, will strain pension systems, healthcare, and the labor market. While life expectancy has increased significantly over time, the shrinking younger workforce will create a growing imbalance between retirees and workers. The article also notes that pension spending is projected to rise from 9.8% of GDP in 2022 to 13.5% by 2050, though recent reforms have slightly reduced this growth.

Bias read (Center): The article presents expert analysis on demographic trends, healthcare economics, and their impact on public finances. It does not take a clear ideological stance, instead offering data-driven observations and projections. The framing remains neutral, focusing on statistical evidence and expert op-­

Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents the views of Prof. Dr. Jože Sambt from the University of Ljubljana's Faculty of Economics regarding healthy life expectancy, demographic challenges, and aging population impacts. The statistics provided align with general demographic trends and are not contradicted by

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a largely neutral and informative tone, presenting expert opinion without overt bias. It uses descriptive language but avoids emotionally charged terms or subjective commentary. However, phrases like 'fascinating' may slightly introduce a personal perspective, though this does

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 658/14/2026
When people retire, Slovenia too often abandons the knowledge they have acquired over decades.

The article discusses the societal challenge of aging populations in Slovenia, highlighting how retirement is often seen merely as an administrative event rather than a transition into continued active participation. It argues that despite increased life expectancy due to advancements in healthcare, education, and nutrition, society has not adequately adapted to provide meaningful roles for older adults beyond traditional retirement. The piece emphasizes that longevity alone does not equate to success unless it includes quality of life and social contribution. According to statistical data, men in Slovenia can expect to live approximately 18.3 years after age 65, while women can expect around 21.9 years, much of which could be spent in relatively healthy and independent conditions. However, there is currently no clear framework or recognition for this extended period of activity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion on the societal implications of aging and retirement policies without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It critiques current frameworks but does not advocate for specific policy changes or align with any ideological perspective.

Why factuality (75): This article references statistical office data and provides specific figures on life expectancy in Slovenia, including gender differences. It cites sources like the Statistical Office and mentions the concept of 'podaljšano dejavno obdobje' (extended active period), which is a recognized demographi

Why objectivity (65): The article presents a critical view of current retirement systems, suggesting they are outdated for a longer-living society. Phrases like 'nedostopnost do znanja' (inaccessibility of knowledge) and 'največji nesmisel sodobne dolgožive družbe' (one of the biggest nonsense of modern longevity society

Gorenjski glas logoGorenjski glasIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 608/15/2026
The demographics of the EU

The European Commission has published its third demographic report, highlighting ongoing population decline across the EU while noting increasing life expectancy. The report states that the EU's population peaked at 450.6 million in 2026 but is projected to fall to 445 million by 2050 and further to 398.8 million by 2100, a decrease of 11.7%. Life expectancy is expected to rise significantly, reaching 90 years for women and 86 years for men by 2100. By 2050, nearly one-third of the EU’s population will be aged 65 or older, compared to one-fifth today. The aging population presents challenges such as labor market pressures, public finances, and healthcare systems, with the number of people needing care expected to rise from 36 to 48 million by 2070. The report suggests measures like enabling older citizens to remain active in the workforce longer, boosting productivity through innovation and AI, and creating new markets for products and services tailored to older adults. European Commissioner Dubravka Šuica emphasized the need to transform these demographic changes into opportunities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data and projections from the European Commission, focusing on demographic trends and their implications for the EU. It includes quotes from the European Commissioner and outlines both challenges and potential solutions without overtly favoring any political stance.

Why factuality (55): The article discusses demographic trends in the EU, referencing a European Commission report from July 2026. It mentions population decline and increased life expectancy, but lacks specific citations or links to the full report. The claim about 'stara mama in vnukinja' (grandmother and granddaughter

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat descriptive and informative, but there is a subtle emphasis on the challenges posed by an aging population. The phrase 'demografski problem EU' (EU demographic problem) frames the issue as negative, which may introduce bias. However, the article remains relatively neutral in its

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories