ON
← Back to feed
Police in Varaždin received two reports of bombs at universities:
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/8/2026

Police in Varaždin received two reports of bombs at universities:

The Varazdin police received two reports of explosive devices placed in the premises of the Faculty of Geotechnics and the Faculty of Organization and Informatics in Varazdin. Police officers were immediately dispatched to both locations, but explosive inspections confirmed that the reports were false. The police authority stated that investigators continue their criminal investigation to determine all circumstances and identify the perpetrator of the false alarm.

The Varazdin police received two reports about bombs at university faculties, which were later found to be false. According to the police, officials received reports of explosive devices placed in the premises of the Faculty of Geotechnics and the Faculty of Organization and Informatics in Varazdin. However, after inspections, no bombs were discovered. Following the reports, police officers were immediately dispatched to both locations. Explosive inspection teams conducted thorough checks but did not find any real explosives. The Varazdin police stated that investigators are continuing their criminal inquiry to determine all circumstances and identify the perpetrator of the false alarm. The incident occurred in Varazdin, involving the Faculty of Geotechnics and the Faculty of Organization and Informatics. The police have confirmed that the reports were unfounded and that no actual threats were present.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 909/8/2026
False reports of bombings at two universities in Varaždin

The police in Varaždin received two reports of explosive devices placed in rooms at the Faculty of Geotechnics and the Faculty of Organization and Informatics. Upon investigation, these reports were found to be false. Police officers conducted explosive searches but did not find any bombs. The police continue their criminal investigation to determine all circumstances and identify the perpetrator of the false alarm.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report of a false alarm incident involving the police and educational institutions. It does not take a clear ideological stance, nor does it emphasize particular political viewpoints. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the actions of law enforcement and the need,

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content, confirming the police received two false bomb reports and conducted inspections that found no explosives. It supports the same factual claims and does not introduce new information. Both articles rely on police statements as the primary source, which is con

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts as reported by the police without adding subjective commentary. It avoids emotional language and sticks to the official narrative without apparent bias.

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 909/8/2026
Police in Varaždin received two reports of bombs at universities:

The Varazdin police received two reports of explosive devices placed in the premises of the Faculty of Geotechnics and the Faculty of Organization and Informatics in Varazdin. Police officers were immediately dispatched to both locations, but explosive inspections confirmed that the reports were false. The police authority stated that investigators continue their criminal investigation to determine all circumstances and identify the perpetrator of the false alarm.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a police response to false bomb threats without apparent ideological slant. It focuses on procedural actions taken by authorities and does not frame the incident through any particular political lens. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing the police's role in

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the actions taken by the police and the outcome of the investigation. There is no emotional language or overt bias, maintaining an objective reporting style.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories