They ask for a political trial for the prosecutor general of Lomas de Zamora who filed a case for corruption against Insaurralde officials

A political trial has been requested against Carlos Baccini, the chief prosecutor of Lomas de Zamora, over his alleged failure in his duties as a public official. The request comes amid a broader corruption scandal involving former mayor of Lomas de Zamora and former Buenos Aires provincial chief of staff, Martín Insaurralde. Baccini faces accusations of improperly closing a criminal case against a municipal accountant who worked during Insaurralde's tenure. He is also charged with the alleged disappearance of evidence related to this case. When questioned about these allegations, Baccini denied them, stating he followed resolution number 1390 issued by the Office of the Attorney General, which means he could not independently review a report without prior formal request from the complainant. The investigation into the municipal accountant began on November 29, 2017, when an auditor from the local branch of the Buenos Aires Provincial Audit Court discovered two boxes and a bag containing invoices, bidding forms, and shipping documents in her office. This discovery led to a complaint regarding potential criminal activity, given that some of the documents were related to companies that supplied the municipality. The initial investigation was handled by prosecutor Pablo Rossi, who took statements from the auditor and detailed the contents of the found materials, including recordings and copies of the items discovered. Among the items found were blank budgets, invoices, and company seals, some of which belonged to firms supplying the city. These findings suggested the presence of a "kit" used to fabricate public procurement processes. As a result, Héctor Rosin, then the city’s accountant, was implicated. According to the auditor, Rosin had claimed ownership of the documents, despite the unusual nature of keeping personal work materials at his workplace. Martín Insaurralde, currently serving as the mayor of Lomas de Zamora, stated that "there isn't a single aspect of the province that is better than it was four years ago," according to archived records. The investigation initially gained momentum. Prosecutor Rossi, who was involved in the early stages, analyzed the documentation and requested further investigative measures. Searches were conducted at the municipal offices and residences linked to Rosin. Additional documents were seized, and forensic accounting and computer analyses were ordered. The search warrants mentioned the possible involvement of multiple municipal officials connected to the investigated scheme. Upon reviewing the companies listed in the documents found by the auditor, investigators determined that Rosin was associated with one of the suppliers of the municipality. Furthermore, his private accounting firm shared the same address as another supplier of the city. By examining the board members of certain companies, investigators identified other high-ranking officials from the Insaurralde administration. According to the case file, on November 9, 2020, the chief prosecutor Baccini transferred the case from Rossi to another prosecutor, who subsequently closed the case based on the conclusion that the operations deemed "noteworthy" by the official auditors did not constitute fraud. This decision sparked controversy and led to calls for Baccini's political trial. Critics argue that the closure of the case undermines transparency and accountability within the justice system. Supporters of Baccini claim he acted within legal parameters, adhering strictly to procedural guidelines set forth by higher authorities. The situation highlights ongoing concerns about corruption and the integrity of judicial processes in Argentina. It also raises questions about the independence of prosecutors and their adherence to due process in handling sensitive cases involving high-profile individuals. As the political trial request moves forward, it will likely bring increased scrutiny upon both Baccini and the broader judicial framework in Lomas de Zamora. The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for public trust in the legal system and the conduct of officials involved in such matters. The case underscores the need for continued vigilance and reform in ensuring that legal procedures are transparent, fair, and free from undue influence. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining rigorous standards in the pursuit of justice and accountability.