ON
← Back to feed
Pentagon: Attacks on Houthis in Yemen have killed more than 150 civilians
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/17/2026

Pentagon: Attacks on Houthis in Yemen have killed more than 150 civilians

The Pentagon has reviewed US airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and found that more than 150 civilians were killed in these operations last year. This information was part of an annual report on civilian casualties submitted to Congress, released amid growing concerns over civilian deaths during military operations under the Trump administration. Concerns have increased further after an American missile struck an Iranian school at the beginning of this year, killing up to 168 people. According to the report, three air strikes conducted in April 2025 targeted enemy forces in Sana'a, the capital controlled by rebels, and near the port of Ras Isa. These attacks resulted in 153 civilian deaths and 243 injuries. The attack on the port was the deadliest, with 80 fatalities and 171 injured. Explosions created large fireballs, and tankers were turned into charred wreckage. The Central Command stated that the strike was not aimed at causing harm to the Yemeni population but rather to eliminate fuel supplies for Houthi terrorists supported by Iran and to deny them illegal revenues used to fund terrorism across the region. The report noted that compensation payments for these three air

The Pentagon has confirmed that more than 150 civilians were killed in U.S. airstrikes targeting the Houthi rebels in Yemen last year, according to a classified review released to Congress. The findings, part of an annual report on civilian casualties, highlight concerns over the impact of military operations under the Trump administration, particularly after a U.S. missile strike reportedly killed up to 168 people at an Iranian-run school earlier this year. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been accused of significantly reducing the staff in an office dedicated to minimizing civilian harm, according to reports from the Associated Press. The review specifically examined three air strikes conducted in April 2025 during the U.S.-led campaign against the Houthi rebels. These strikes were carried out in response to militant attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, a critical maritime corridor linking the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean, and Israel. The targets included hostile forces operating in and around Sanaa, the Houthi-controlled capital, and the Ras Isa port. In total, 153 civilians were killed and 243 were wounded in these attacks. The strike on the Ras Isa port proved to be the deadliest of the three, with 80 fatalities and 171 injuries recorded. The attack caused massive explosions, sending towering flames into the sky and turning tanker vehicles into flaming wreckage. The Houthi group broadcast graphic footage of the aftermath through its satellite news channel, al-Masirah, showing bodies scattered across the port area. Despite the destruction, the U.S. Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East, maintained that the strike was not directed at harming the people of Yemen. In a statement issued in April 2025, the Central Command explained that the operation aimed to neutralize a key source of funding for the Iran-backed Houthi rebels, who have been financing terrorist activities in the region for over a decade. The command concluded that the three strikes "more likely than not" caused civilian casualties, based on intelligence assessments, satellite imagery, and public reports. However, the Pentagon's review noted that condolence payments to the families of the victims were deemed inappropriate, without providing further explanation. Such payments are not legally mandated and do not constitute an official acknowledgment of fault, according to the report. Nonetheless, they have been used in past cases, such as after a drone strike in Afghanistan in 2021 that killed 10 individuals, including seven children. The Pentagon promised to provide financial support to the affected families in that incident. The U.S. military initiated its campaign against the Houthi rebels in 2023, during the Biden administration, following a surge in attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The Houthi rebels claimed their actions were meant to halt Israeli military operations in Gaza and support Palestinian interests, although these attacks coincided with their attempts to consolidate control over Yemen. The conflict escalated into what military officials and analysts described as the most intense naval engagement the U.S. Navy had encountered since World War II, as fighter jets and destroyers intercepted Houthi drones and missiles targeting both commercial vessels and U.S. warships. Currently, the Houthi rebels continue to launch increasingly frequent attacks against Yemeni government forces, Saudi Arabian oil infrastructure, and Saudi naval assets in the Red Sea. This escalation has raised fears that the resumption of hostilities could reignite Yemen’s long-standing civil war, which had been temporarily paused under a 2022 ceasefire agreement. With tensions rising and regional alliances shifting, the situation remains volatile, posing potential risks to international stability and security.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 6 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

7 reports

Euronews logoEuronewsIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 888/13/2026
US strikes targeting Houthis killed 153 civilians in Yemen last year, Pentagon review says

A Pentagon review of U.S. airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen revealed that 153 civilians were killed in three strikes conducted in April 2025. These strikes targeted areas in or near Sanaa and the Ras Isa port, where the most lethal attack occurred, killing 80 people and injuring 171. The U.S. Central Command stated the strikes were intended to disrupt Houthi operations but acknowledged civilian harm was 'more likely than not.' The report, submitted to Congress, included findings based on U.S. intelligence, imagery, and open-source data. The review also noted that condolence payments were deemed inappropriate for these incidents, though such payments have been made in other cases involving civilian casualties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from a Pentagon review without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both the U.S. Central Command and descriptions of the humanitarian impact, providing balanced perspectives on the issue.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the Pentagon's findings as reported in the primary source document, including the number of civilian casualties, the locations targeted, and the statements from CENTCOM. It does not add any new information beyond what is presented in the original report. However, it s

Why objectivity (88): The tone leans toward highlighting the humanitarian impact and political tensions, particularly mentioning the attack on the primary school and the reduction of the civilian harm office. While not overtly biased, it frames the issue through a more narrative lens rather than strictly presenting facts

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 878/13/2026
Pentagon: Attacks on Houthis in Yemen have killed more than 150 civilians

The Pentagon has reviewed US airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and found that more than 150 civilians were killed in these operations last year. This information was part of an annual report on civilian casualties submitted to Congress, released amid growing concerns over civilian deaths during military operations under the Trump administration. Concerns have increased further after an American missile struck an Iranian school at the beginning of this year, killing up to 168 people. According to the report, three air strikes conducted in April 2025 targeted enemy forces in Sana'a, the capital controlled by rebels, and near the port of Ras Isa. These attacks resulted in 153 civilian deaths and 243 injuries. The attack on the port was the deadliest, with 80 fatalities and 171 injured. Explosions created large fireballs, and tankers were turned into charred wreckage. The Central Command stated that the strike was not aimed at causing harm to the Yemeni population but rather to eliminate fuel supplies for Houthi terrorists supported by Iran and to deny them illegal revenues used to fund terrorism across the region. The report noted that compensation payments for these three air

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the Pentagon's findings regarding civilian casualties in airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen. It includes perspectives from both the Pentagon and the Central Command, as well as contextual information about previous incidents involving civilian deaths

Why factuality (94): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, providing accurate numbers and details about the airstrikes, civilian casualties, and the statements from CENTCOM. It uses Croatian terms appropriately and maintains alignment with the original report. Minor differences in phrasing do not aff

Why objectivity (87): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner but includes some contextual elements like the mention of the AP report on Pete Hegseth, which adds a slight political angle. This introduces a minor subjective element, though it remains largely objective.

Associated Press logoAssociated PressIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/12/2026
US strikes targeting Houthis killed 153 civilians in Yemen last year, Pentagon review says

A Pentagon review has revealed that US military strikes targeting the Houthi group in Yemen resulted in the deaths of 153 civilians during the previous year. The report highlights concerns over civilian casualties in the ongoing conflict in Yemen, which has been marked by significant humanitarian challenges. The findings underscore the complexity of conducting military operations in densely populated areas and raise questions about the effectiveness of current strategies to minimize harm to non-combatants. This information comes amid broader discussions about the impact of foreign involvement in the Yemen war.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement based on a Pentagon review without overtly favoring any side. It does not include subjective language or emphasize particular viewpoints, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the Pentagon assessment from the primary source document, reporting the death toll of 153 civilians and aligning with the details about the strikes in April 2025. It does not add any new information beyond what is presented in the official report. However, it omits so

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts in a straightforward manner without overt bias, though it uses phrases like 'targeting Houthis' which could imply a certain perspective. It avoids emotional language and sticks to the reported findings, maintaining a generally neutral tone.

Euronews logoEuronewsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758/17/2026
Yemen risks return to 'full-scale conflict' if Houthi strikes continue, UN rights chief warns

The United Nations human rights chief, Volker Türk, has expressed serious concern over the increasing number of civilian casualties in Yemen due to the escalation of hostilities. He warned that continued fighting could plunge the country back into full-scale conflict, emphasizing the need for immediate de-escalation to prevent further suffering. Yemen has been caught in a prolonged civil war for over a decade, and recent actions by the Houthi group, supported by Iran, have disrupted a 2022 ceasefire agreement with the Saudi-backed government. Recent attacks by the Houthis have targeted both military and civilian locations, resulting in significant loss of life and injury. These include attacks on the port of Mokha, a cargo ship in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and various civilian infrastructure such as hospitals and fuel storage facilities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the concerns of the UN human rights chief regarding the situation in Yemen without taking a clear stance on the political implications of the conflict. It reports on the actions of the Houthi group and the impact of their attacks but does not favor one side over the other. The报道

Why factuality (85): The article aligns with the Euronews primary source document regarding the context of Houthi attacks and the broader conflict in Yemen. It mentions the escalation of hostilities and the potential for full-scale conflict, which matches the timeline and events described in the Pentagon report. However

Why objectivity (75): The tone of the article leans towards concern and urgency, emphasizing the humanitarian impact and warning of further conflict. While it presents facts neutrally, the emphasis on the UN rights chief's warnings may subtly frame the situation as increasingly dire, potentially influencing reader percep

South China Morning Post logoSouth China Morning PostIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 208/9/2026
Yemen’s Houthis attack Saudi refinery after kingdom signs defence pact

Yemen's Houthi rebels attacked a Saudi Aramco refinery in Jazan, two days after Saudi Arabia signed a defense agreement with Turkey and Pakistan amid rising regional tensions linked to the ongoing conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. The new defense pact aims to bolster collective security among the three nations, stating that an attack on any one of them would be considered an attack on all. However, it remains unclear if Pakistan or Turkey would participate in any retaliatory actions against the Houthi strikes. Earlier this month, the Houthi group announced a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia in the Red Sea, accusing Riyadh of a 'siege', a claim denied by Saudi authorities. According to the Saudi energy ministry, a fire broke out at the refinery but was quickly controlled, resulting in no injuries. The Houthi military spokesperson confirmed the attack via social media, noting that drones have previously targeted Aramco facilities in Jazan and Yanbu.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event factually, without overtly favoring either side. It includes statements from both the Houthi rebels and the Saudi government, providing balanced information on the situation and the recent defense pact. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that would倾斜

Why factuality (30): This article discusses entirely unrelated content about the Middle East war, not the drone strike in Russia. It contains no information about the event described in the primary source document. The factual claims are completely disconnected from the actual event.

Why objectivity (20): The article presents a highly biased perspective favoring the victims of the conflict, using emotionally charged language like 'condemned the destruction' and 'violations of ceasefire agreements.' It lacks neutrality and balance in presenting the situation.

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒CenterFactual 20Objective 508/9/2026
Riyadh under pressure: Saudi Arabia's two front war in Yemen

The situation in Yemen has escalated again, with both the conflict between Iran-backed Houthi rebels and Saudi Arabia intensifying, as well as renewed fighting within Yemen against the internationally recognized government. On Saturday, a military spokesperson from the government based in Aden announced that their forces had attacked the Houthi rebels on multiple fronts. Prior to this, Houthi attacks on government positions resulted in significant casualties, including civilians. The UN special envoy for Yemen, Hans Grundberg, warned that Yemen now faces a greater risk of another large-scale conflict than at any time since the UN-mediated ceasefire in April 2022. This ceasefire is under threat, and Yemen risks being drawn into a broader regional confrontation. The power struggle over control of the country overlaps with the larger regional conflict involving Iran, which supports the Houthi. Saudi Arabia leads an anti-Houthi coalition that includes the internationally recognized government, but has been unsuccessful in driving the Houthi out of Sanaa, which they have controlled since September 2015. As part of the campaign against the Houthi, Saudi Arabia has imposed a blockade on H

Bias read (Center): The article presents the ongoing conflict in Yemen as a complex geopolitical issue involving multiple actors, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the internationally recognized government. It provides balanced reporting by mentioning the perspectives of various stakeholders, such as the UN special Env

Why factuality (20): This article is unrelated to the drone strike in Russia and discusses the conflict in Yemen instead. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated for factuality regarding the specified event.

Why objectivity (50): As the article is unrelated to the drone strike in Russia, its objectivity score is based on general standards of neutrality, which it fails to meet due to its focus on a different topic.

Internazionale logoInternazionaleIndependentProgressiveFactual 0Objective 08/11/2026
Yemen's Houthis attacked Saudi ship in Bab el-Mandeb, the Houthi-run news agency says

The Houthi group in Yemen claimed responsibility for attacking a Saudi vessel in the strategic Bab el-Mandeb Strait, according to their affiliated news agency. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a critical waterway connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and plays a significant role in global trade routes. This incident highlights ongoing tensions between Yemen's Houthi rebels and regional powers such as Saudi Arabia. The attack could potentially disrupt maritime traffic and escalate hostilities in the region. However, confirmation of the attack and its exact nature remain pending verification from independent sources.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the claim made by the Houthi-run news agency without providing counter-narratives or perspectives from other parties involved, such as the Saudi authorities or international maritime organizations. This lack of balanced reporting suggests a potential left-leaning bias, as it may

Why factuality (0): The article title is incomplete and does not provide any content related to the event. No factual information is presented, making it impossible to evaluate its alignment with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (0): As the article contains no content, it cannot be assessed for objectivity. The lack of information prevents any judgment on neutrality or balance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories