ON
← Back to feed
FACT CHECK: Video of Marcos and Romualdez laughing about ‘fooling’ the public is AI-generated
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

FACT CHECK: Video of Marcos and Romualdez laughing about ‘fooling’ the public is AI-generated

A viral video circulating online claims to show Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez laughing together after allegedly misleading the public regarding legal actions against Romualdez. However, multiple AI detection tools have identified the video as highly likely being AI-generated. The video references Marcos's State of the Nation Address (SONA), where he mentioned potential legal action against Romualdez related to a flood control scandal. Despite the video's popularity on social media, there is no verified record of the interaction occurring, and no official sources confirm its authenticity. The video lacks any disclaimers indicating it was AI-generated.

Palace officials have publicly criticized Representative Edgar Erice for what they describe as unfounded theories regarding President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s stance on former Speaker Martin Romualdez. On Thursday, Palace Press Officer Claire Castro addressed Erice's recent criticisms, challenging him to provide factual support for his claims. She accused the lawmaker of basing his arguments on speculation rather than verified information. Erice had previously expressed concerns over Marcos' handling of the situation involving Romualdez, particularly following the President’s remarks during his State of the Nation Address (SONA). In an interview, Erice characterized Marcos’ actions as mere optics, suggesting that the President was prioritizing image over justice. This led to a direct confrontation between Erice and the Palace, which emphasized the need for evidence-based discourse. Meanwhile, a viral video circulating online purported to show Marcos and Romualdez laughing together after allegedly misleading the public. The video, shared on Facebook by a page titled “Canadian Tambay,” claimed the pair were discussing how they had “fooled” the public with Marcos’ statements against Romualdez. The clip included dialogue in Filipino, with Romualdez appearing to comment on Marcos’ actions before both burst into laughter. However, multiple AI detection tools have identified the video as AI-generated. DetectVideo AI assigned an 80% likelihood that the footage was entirely synthetic, with only a 7% chance it was genuine and a 13% probability it was manipulated. Sightengine further confirmed the findings, giving the video a 98% chance of being AI-generated and noting no signs of face manipulation. These assessments suggest the video is not based on real footage. The video sparked outrage among some social media users who believed the content depicted a real conversation between the two figures. The post received over 1,900 reactions, 330 comments, and more than 1,000 shares, drawing criticism from viewers who felt the video portrayed the politicians negatively. Despite the attention, no credible source has confirmed the authenticity of the scene, and no official records back up the claim. During his SONA address on July 27, Marcos announced that the Ombudsman would investigate Romualdez for alleged plunder and graft related to the flood control scandal. The President emphasized his commitment to justice, stating, “Masakit man sa akin ito, ngunit kailangan nating gawin ang tama. Hindi ako pangulo ng aking pamilya. Hindi ako pangulo ng aking kaibigan. Ako ay Pangulo ng Pilipinas, at ang tungkulin ko ay sa inyo: ang aking mga kapwa Pilipino.” (Painful as this is for me, we have to do what is right. I am not the president of my family. I am not the president of my friends. I am the President of the Philippines, and my duty is to you, my fellow Filipinos.) Romualdez has consistently denied the allegations, asserting that he has done nothing wrong. In a statement responding to Marcos’ remarks, he acknowledged the emotional impact on their family but reaffirmed his readiness to defend himself through legal channels. “Ang tama ay ang sumunod sa proseso at hayaan ang ebidensya ang magsalita,” he wrote, emphasizing the importance of due process. The growing rift between Marcos and Romualdez reflects broader tensions within the administration, particularly around corruption allegations linked to the flood control project. As the situation develops, both sides will likely continue to engage in public debates, with the Palace maintaining its focus on transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, the controversy surrounding the AI-generated video underscores the challenges of distinguishing truth from fabrication in the digital age.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago
FACT CHECK: Video of Marcos and Romualdez laughing about ‘fooling’ the public is AI-generated

A viral video circulating online claims to show Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez laughing together after allegedly misleading the public regarding legal actions against Romualdez. However, multiple AI detection tools have identified the video as highly likely being AI-generated. The video references Marcos's State of the Nation Address (SONA), where he mentioned potential legal action against Romualdez related to a flood control scandal. Despite the video's popularity on social media, there is no verified record of the interaction occurring, and no official sources confirm its authenticity. The video lacks any disclaimers indicating it was AI-generated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual analysis of an AI-generated video involving prominent political figures without taking a stance on the political implications of the content itself. It relies on AI detection tools and does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately states that AI detection tools flagged the video as likely AI-generated. It provides specific details about the claim being investigated, including the captions and quotes from the video. However, it does not explicitly mention the name of the AI detection tool used, though it

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without overt bias. It clearly labels the claim as 'FALSE' and explains why, while also noting the viral nature of the post and the reactions it generated.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7510 days ago
Palace slams Erice over ‘theories’ on Marcos, Romualdez

The Philippine Palace Press Office, represented by Claire Castro, criticized Caloocan Representative Edgar Erice for making allegations against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s stance on former Speaker Martin Romualdez. Castro urged Erice to provide evidence for his claims, suggesting that Erice's comments were based on 'theories' and speculation rather than concrete facts. Erice responded by dismissing Marcos' remarks as merely 'optics,' implying they lacked substance. The exchange highlights ongoing political tensions within the country regarding leadership and governance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the argument without overtly favoring one perspective. It reports Castro's challenge to Erice to back up his claims and includes Erice's counterpoint, indicating a balanced approach to the political dispute.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the palace's response to Rep. Erice's criticism of President Marcos regarding Martin Romualdez. It cites specific statements from Palace Press Officer Claire Castro and mentions Erice's characterization of Marcos' remarks as 'optics.' The details align with the cross-s

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the palace's perspective but does not provide direct quotes from Erice or balance it with his full argument. The tone leans slightly toward supporting the palace's stance by emphasizing the challenge to Erice to substantiate his claims.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories