Background of the AI University Aleksandar Repić 50 thousand people arrived in a week

In recent days, more than 50,000 euros have flowed into the accounts of Aleksander Repić’s company, which operates within the framework of AI University. The funds came in just over a week after Repić became the owner of the business, which processes user payments through its platform. This rapid influx has raised questions about the legitimacy of the operation and the nature of the services being offered under the name “AI University.” Repić, a Slovenian entrepreneur, acquired the company through a restructuring process. According to reports, he is working with two other Slovenians who manage marketing activities for the AI University via their Cypriot-based firm. The company's headquarters is located in the building owned by a businessman connected to the circle of Zoran Janković, a local political figure. These connections suggest a network of influence that extends beyond mere business dealings. The name “AI University” has sparked controversy due to its similarity to a real university, which has been accused of misuse of its image. The actual institution behind this alleged fraud is not yet fully identified, though there are indications that the name was chosen deliberately to exploit public trust. This situation raises legal concerns regarding intellectual property and brand identity. There is growing concern among students who may have purchased courses or information from Repić’s so-called university. Many are questioning whether they could have obtained the same data for free online. With prices ranging up to 500 euros per piece of information, the cost discrepancy highlights potential exploitation of educational needs. The case has drawn attention from both local authorities and media outlets. While some sources point to the involvement of Repić’s associates, others emphasize the need for further investigation into the financial transactions and the legality of the operations. Legal experts warn that such practices could violate consumer protection laws and intellectual property rights. Authorities are reportedly looking into the matter, although no formal charges have been filed yet. The police have stated that they are monitoring the situation closely and will take appropriate action if necessary. Meanwhile, the affected individuals continue to seek clarity on how to reclaim their money or challenge the validity of the services they received. As the investigation unfolds, the focus remains on verifying the authenticity of the AI University and determining whether the company has engaged in deceptive practices. The outcome of this inquiry could set a precedent for similar cases involving fake educational institutions and misleading branding. For now, the spotlight remains on Repić and his associates, with the expectation that further details will emerge in the coming weeks.