ON
← Back to feed
These are the gasoline stations that will consume the least fuel in 2026.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

These are the gasoline stations that will consume the least fuel in 2026.

The Italian website Motor1 has published a list of gasoline-powered cars with the lowest fuel consumption in the first half of 2026. The results are based on a standardized test covering 360 kilometers between Rome and Forlì, conducted by the same portal using all test vehicles. Two models topped the list, achieving an average consumption of just 4.05 liters per 100 kilometers: the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Hybrid 4WD AllGrip and the new Mercedes CLA 200 4Matic. The third place was taken by the Seat Ibiza FR 1.5 TSI EVO DSG ACT, which is the most efficient gasoline-only car without electrification, with an average consumption of 4.15 liters per 100 kilometers. The fourth position was shared by the Citroën C5 Aircross Hybrid and the new Jeep Compass e-Hybrid, both with a hybrid powertrain and an average consumption of 4.65 liters per 100 kilometers. The Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi Mild Hybrid came next with an average of 5.05 liters per 100 kilometers. The Ford Tourneo Courier ranked last due to its size, height, and poor aerodynamics, consuming an average of 6.30 liters per 100 kilometers.

In the first half of 2026, two models emerged as the most fuel-efficient gasoline-powered vehicles according to a standardized 360-kilometer test conducted by Italian publication Motor1. The test route stretched from Rome to Forlì, and results were based on average fuel consumption measured over this distance. The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Hybrid 4WD AllGrip and the new Mercedes CLA 200 4Matic tied for first place with an identical average fuel consumption of 4.05 liters per 100 kilometers. This marked a notable achievement for both manufacturers, highlighting advancements in hybrid technology and efficiency improvements in compact sedans and hatchbacks. The Seat Ibiza FR 1.5 TSI EVO DSG ACT came in third with an average fuel consumption of 4.15 liters per 100 kilometers. Notably, this vehicle represented the most efficient traditional internal combustion engine car without any form of electrification, underscoring its performance in a segment increasingly dominated by hybrid and fully electric alternatives. Its success was attributed to optimized engine tuning, lightweight materials, and improved aerodynamics, which collectively contributed to lower fuel usage. Following closely behind were the Citroën C5 Aircross Hybrid and the new Jeep Compass e-Hybrid, both achieving an average fuel consumption of 4.65 liters per 100 kilometers. These models featured mild hybrid systems that supplemented their conventional engines with small battery packs and regenerative braking technologies. Their performance demonstrated how even modest electrification could significantly enhance fuel economy while maintaining the driving characteristics expected from traditional SUVs and crossover vehicles. The Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi Mild Hybrid secured the fifth position with an average fuel consumption of 5.05 liters per 100 kilometers. As a subcompact SUV, the Stonic's placement reflected the growing trend of integrating mild hybrid systems into smaller vehicles to improve efficiency without compromising practicality or usability. The inclusion of such a model highlighted the expanding market for hybrid technology across different segments of the automotive industry. At the bottom of the list stood the Ford Tourneo Courier, which averaged 6.30 liters per 100 kilometers during the test. This result was largely influenced by the vehicle’s size, height, and less aerodynamic design, which increased drag and consequently fuel consumption. The Tourneo Courier, primarily used for commercial purposes, faced challenges typical of larger vehicles designed for utility rather than efficiency. Despite these limitations, it remained a popular choice among users requiring substantial cargo space and passenger capacity. The rankings underscored the ongoing shift towards more efficient powertrains in the automotive sector. Manufacturers continued to invest heavily in hybrid and electric technologies to meet stricter emissions regulations and consumer demand for better fuel economy. While traditional gasoline engines still held relevance, especially in markets where infrastructure for alternative fuels remained underdeveloped, the integration of hybrid systems appeared to offer a viable middle ground. The test results also revealed varying degrees of success among different vehicle types and sizes. Compact cars and hatchbacks generally performed better due to their smaller dimensions and lighter weight, whereas larger vehicles struggled with higher fuel consumption despite technological advances. This disparity emphasized the importance of vehicle design and engineering in determining overall efficiency. As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, the competition among manufacturers to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles is likely to intensify. With increasing environmental awareness and regulatory pressures, companies are expected to push further innovations in both hybrid and fully electric technologies. The upcoming year will see more models entering the market with advanced energy-saving features, potentially reshaping the current standings and setting new benchmarks for fuel efficiency.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 803 days ago
These are the gasoline stations that will consume the least fuel in 2026.

The Italian website Motor1 has published a list of gasoline-powered cars with the lowest fuel consumption in the first half of 2026. The results are based on a standardized test covering 360 kilometers between Rome and Forlì, conducted by the same portal using all test vehicles. Two models topped the list, achieving an average consumption of just 4.05 liters per 100 kilometers: the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Hybrid 4WD AllGrip and the new Mercedes CLA 200 4Matic. The third place was taken by the Seat Ibiza FR 1.5 TSI EVO DSG ACT, which is the most efficient gasoline-only car without electrification, with an average consumption of 4.15 liters per 100 kilometers. The fourth position was shared by the Citroën C5 Aircross Hybrid and the new Jeep Compass e-Hybrid, both with a hybrid powertrain and an average consumption of 4.65 liters per 100 kilometers. The Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi Mild Hybrid came next with an average of 5.05 liters per 100 kilometers. The Ford Tourneo Courier ranked last due to its size, height, and poor aerodynamics, consuming an average of 6.30 liters per 100 kilometers.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual comparison of fuel efficiency among gasoline-powered vehicles without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It focuses on technical data and testing methodology rather than ideological positions. While the topic relates to energy policy and environmental考量

Why factuality (75): The article aligns closely with the primary source document from Motor1, reporting similar models and consumption figures. It mentions the standardized Rome-Forlì test route and provides comparable fuel efficiency numbers. However, it omits some details like the mention of the '5 piccolette da città

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, presenting the results without overt bias. The language is straightforward and focuses on delivering the data without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.

tportal logotportalIndependentCenteryesterday
You're looking for a fuel-efficient SUV?

The article discusses a comprehensive fuel efficiency test conducted by Francuski Auto Plus on 1000 kilometers of driving under various conditions, focusing on C-SUV models with the lowest operating costs. The Dacia Bigster 1.2 Mild Hybrid-G 140 finished third, consuming 9 liters of LPG per 100 km, costing around 94 euros for 1000 km. The Renault Symbioz 1.2 Eco-G 120 came second, using 8.1 liters of LPG per 100 km at a cost of 84 euros. The winner was the Ford Kuga 2.5 FHEV Flexifuel E85, which used 8.5 liters of ethanol per 100 km, costing just 72 euros for 1000 km. Other notable models included the Dacia Bigster 4x4 LPG (102 euros), Nissan Qashqai 1.5 e-Power, and Renault Symbioz 1.8 E-Tech Full Hybrid (both at 103 euros). The results highlight LPG and hybrid vehicles as cost-effective options for drivers covering large distances annually.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual comparison of vehicle fuel costs based on a testing methodology, without overtly promoting any political agenda or ideology. It focuses on economic efficiency and environmental considerations, which are often debated in political discourse but are presented here as a '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories