An article from Jutarnji list reports on a hygiene issue at a fish market in Zagreb's Kvatrić area, where bird droppings have accumulated on a canopy above the entrance. The market, located within the broader Kvatrić marketplace but managed separately by a different entity, faces challenges due to unclear jurisdiction over shared spaces. Cleaning is sporadic, occurring roughly once a month, and costs are covered from the property owners' contingency fund. Property owners dispute this arrangement, arguing they should bear responsibility for maintenance. Proposed solutions include installing additional spikes to deter birds, though these have had limited success. The situation is further complicated by the absence of a designated representative for the property owners, delaying necessary decisions on repairs and funding. The issue extends beyond the canopy, involving a larger population of pigeons in the area, particularly around the old Gorica building awaiting demolition. Waste feeding also contributes to the problem, attracting various animals and pests.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a local infrastructure and management issue without overtly favoring any political group or ideology. It describes the administrative complexities and responsibilities between different entities without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue has
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a specific incident at a fish market in Zagreb where bird droppings have accumulated on a canopy. It provides details from a reader's submitted video, quotes statements from the city's commercial company confirming ownership and management structure, and includes an anonymous
Why objectivity (72): The article presents the situation neutrally but includes some subjective elements such as the reaction of customers being 'zgroženi' (disgusted) and uses phrases like 'problem se nalazi' (the issue lies) which may imply a negative judgment. While it quotes multiple sources, including officials and





