The Karlovac opposition strongly condemned the demolition of the building and the detention of two citizens: "Symbol of repression"...
In Karlovac, local representatives from Možemo!, SDP, and the Pensioners' Party, along with supporters of independent lists, strongly condemned the destruction of linden trees on Ban Jelačić Square and the arrest of two women who opposed the demolition. They described the action as a symbol of repression by municipal authorities and a disregard for citizens' wishes, professional opinions, and public interest. Dobriša Adamec from Možemo! criticized the mayor for ignoring over 4,000 residents who opposed the project, calling it a reflection of governmental incompetence. Ehlimana Planinac from SDP expressed disappointment, stating that the removal of the trees was planned and accelerated, with security personnel deployed to protect the city from its own citizens. She noted that citizen voices and expertise were ignored by the ruling HDZ, leading to the destruction of urban greenery and the revelation of false promises regarding tree relocation. Vesna Horvat from the Pensioners' Party highlighted that despite a 2023 strategy to revitalize the city’s green spaces, large areas have been concrete-covered, and now the lindens are being removed. The project, led by architects Krešimir Rogač
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
In Karlovac, local representatives from Možemo!, SDP, and the Pensioners' Party, along with supporters of independent lists, strongly condemned the destruction of linden trees on Ban Jelačić Square and the arrest of two women who opposed the demolition. They described the action as a symbol of repression by municipal authorities and a disregard for citizens' wishes, professional opinions, and public interest. Dobriša Adamec from Možemo! criticized the mayor for ignoring over 4,000 residents who opposed the project, calling it a reflection of governmental incompetence. Ehlimana Planinac from SDP expressed disappointment, stating that the removal of the trees was planned and accelerated, with security personnel deployed to protect the city from its own citizens. She noted that citizen voices and expertise were ignored by the ruling HDZ, leading to the destruction of urban greenery and the revelation of false promises regarding tree relocation. Vesna Horvat from the Pensioners' Party highlighted that despite a 2023 strategy to revitalize the city’s green spaces, large areas have been concrete-covered, and now the lindens are being removed. The project, led by architects Krešimir Rogač
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the destruction of the linden trees as an act of repression by the municipal authorities, emphasizing the disregard for citizen input and professional opinion. It criticizes the ruling HDZ for ignoring public concerns and highlights the involvement of opposition parties and civic-
In Zagreb's Borovje neighborhood, residents are protesting against a city plan to build 11 residential buildings with around 600 affordable apartments. The project has sparked controversy as locals argue it threatens the last remaining green space in the area. Over 1,000 comments were submitted during a public consultation, with residents expressing concerns about traffic congestion, lack of parking, and the environmental impact. They claim the development is based on outdated data and that the city’s approach prioritizes construction over community needs. City officials defend the project as part of a long-planned housing strategy aimed at addressing rising rental prices. Minister Branko Bačić acknowledges the need for new housing but suggests alternative locations could preserve green areas. Residents remain determined to continue their campaign through petitions, public meetings, and potential protests if their concerns are not addressed.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a struggle between residents advocating for environmental preservation and urban planning authorities pushing forward with development. While the city and minister present the project as necessary for affordable housing, the narrative emphasizes the grassroots push
The article announces a public presentation of the publication 'Metropolis – Perspektive novog grada' by the Association of Architects in Rijeka, scheduled for Wednesday, July 22, 2026, at 7 PM on Molo Longa. The event will take place behind the Dezinsekcije building, offering views of the city's port area and the historical port warehouses. The publication explores the future of these historic port spaces and their complex relationship with the river and its banks. It includes expert texts, a panel discussion transcript, and student visions connecting historical layers with potential transformations. The event aims to open dialogue about industrial heritage, public space, and opportunities for new social, cultural, and creative content. The publication was supported by the Croatian Chamber of Architects and local authorities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a cultural and academic event focused on urban development and historical transformation. While the subject relates to urban planning and infrastructure, which can have political implications, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather than taking a clear立场
The initiative 'Borovje' has collected over 1,000 individual objections against the proposed urban development plan for the southern zone of Borovje. The protests were held at the address of the City Office for Local Self-Government, Traffic, Communal Services, Civil Protection, and Security. The initiative argues that the plan would lead to the destruction of the last large connected green area in the neighborhood. They demand the suspension of the current process, the creation of a new plan based on additional expert analyses, and direct involvement of residents in decision-making. Alka Vuica, representing the initiative, warns of overcrowding and lack of infrastructure, comparing the potential loss of green space to the concrete paving of Park Stara Trešnjevka. The current proposal includes 7.27 hectares with approximately 600 homes for around 1,700 residents, with mixed-use predominantly residential areas covering 56.1% and a public park occupying 1.23 hectares. Residents emphasize the need for environmental impact assessments and traffic, communal, and educational infrastructure analyses. They oppose the proposed model of development, citing its outdated nature and potential负面
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a struggle between local residents and city authorities, emphasizing the grassroots opposition to urban development plans. It highlights concerns about environmental degradation, quality of life, and social equity, which align with left-leaning values. The emphasis on
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.