ON
← Back to feed
Óscar Puente censors the King's inn in Colombia with a journalist: "It is not innocuous with whom he is photographed" and "contaminates his image"
Spain🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives11 days ago

Óscar Puente censors the King's inn in Colombia with a journalist: "It is not innocuous with whom he is photographed" and "contaminates his image"

Minister of Transport Óscar Puente has criticized King Felipe VI for posing for a photo with journalist Javier Negre during his visit to Colombia, calling the act 'an absolute disgrace.' Puente expressed this criticism on social media platform X, arguing that the king, as a symbol, should not be photographed with individuals who may compromise his image. The incident follows a video showing Negre approaching the king and requesting a photograph. Negre responded by accusing Puente of hypocrisy, pointing out that the king was forced to greet representatives of a corrupt government blocking his access to Ceuta. The exchange escalated into personal attacks, with Puente labeling Negre as a 'virus' and criticizing him for associating with terrorists. Puente further outlined four reasons why he considers the photo session inappropriate, including allegations of insults toward the queen and accusations of defamation and ultra-right activism against progressive politicians.

The Spanish monarchy has found itself at the center of a political storm after a video emerged showing King Felipe VI shaking hands with and posing for a photograph with Javier Negre, a controversial right-wing media figure known for his inflammatory rhetoric. The incident took place during the swearing-in ceremony of Colombia’s new president, Abelardo de la Espriella, in Cali on August 5, 2026. The footage, shared by Negre on social media, sparked immediate backlash, particularly from Spain’s Minister of Transport, Óscar Puente, who called the encounter “an absolute disgrace.” Puente, a member of the ruling coalition led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, expressed his outrage through a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter). He accused Negre of repeatedly and seriously insulting Queen Letizia and King Felipe VI, labeling him a professional in the dissemination of defamation and falsehoods. Additionally, he described Negre as an ultra-right activist who engages in harassment against progressive politicians and their families, including his own. Puente argued that the king, as a symbol of national unity, should not be associated with individuals whose actions undermine public trust. In response, Negre defended the interaction, stating that it was a routine diplomatic gesture and that the king had been invited to attend the event as a representative of Spain. He criticized the Spanish government for its handling of migration issues, particularly the ongoing crisis in Ceuta, and accused Puente of hypocrisy. Negre claimed that the royal family was aware of his identity and that they had allowed the meeting to take place, suggesting that the criticism was politically motivated. The controversy quickly escalated into a broader political debate. Members of the opposition Popular Party (PP) seized upon Puente’s remarks, using them to criticize the current administration. PP Secretary General Miguel Tellado accused the government of failing to address the migrant situation in Ceuta and questioned whether the prime minister’s absence during the crisis was appropriate. Meanwhile, other members of the PP, such as Jaime de los Santos, shifted focus back to Puente, accusing him of undermining the monarchy and aligning himself too closely with the government. Within the government, there were signs of division. While Puente voiced his concerns publicly, the Ministry of Justice, led by Félix Bolaños, chose not to comment directly on the issue, emphasizing that it was not his role to judge whom the monarch chooses to interact with. This stance reflected a growing reluctance among some officials to engage in direct confrontation over matters involving the monarchy, which remains a sensitive institution in Spanish politics. Javier Negre, 41 years old, is a former journalist who gained prominence through his work at El Mundo before launching Estado de Alarma, a platform that evolved into EDATV. His media outlet has become influential in Latin America, often taking a confrontational stance toward left-leaning policies and figures. Negre has previously made disparaging remarks about members of the Spanish royal family, calling Queen Letizia a “disgrace” and King Felipe VI a “puppet” of Prime Minister Sánchez. These past comments have contributed to the current controversy, as they suggest a long-standing tension between Negre and the monarchy. The episode highlights the deepening polarization within Spanish society, with the monarchy increasingly becoming a focal point for ideological clashes. While Puente’s public condemnation marks a rare instance of a senior official openly criticizing the king, it also underscores the challenges faced by the monarchy in maintaining its relevance and perceived legitimacy in an era of shifting political dynamics. As the debate continues, both sides remain entrenched in their positions, with little sign of compromise in sight.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

20minutos logo20minutosIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days ago
Óscar Puente points to King Felipe VI and criticizes that he did not prevent a photo "with an ultra-right activist"

Óscar Puente, un comentarista político en el periódico 20Minutos, criticó públicamente al Rey Felipe VI por no haber impedido que se tomara una foto con un activista de ultraderecha durante un evento oficial. La crítica se centra en la percepción de que la monarquía española podría estar permitiendo la visibilidad de figuras políticas radicales. El comentario refleja una postura más progresista y crítica hacia las posiciones conservadoras dentro del establishment político español.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta una crítica directa al Rey Felipe VI por su supuesta tolerancia hacia activistas de ultraderecha, lo cual sugiere una valoración negativa de las posiciones conservadoras. La elección de palabras como 'activista de ultraderecha' y la atribución de responsabilidad al monarca refle

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Óscar Puente criticized King Felipe VI for not preventing a photo with an ultra-right activist. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that Puente made such comments.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the facts neutrally but uses terms like 'ultraderecha' which may carry some ideological connotations. It does not appear to take sides beyond reporting Puente’s criticism.

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 5511 days ago
Puente calls the greeting of Felipe VI to Javier Negre "absolutely ignominious": "His image is contaminated"

The meeting between King Felipe VI and ultra-right activist Javier Negre during the inauguration of Colombia's new president, Abelardo de la Espriella, has sparked political controversy. Minister of Transport Óscar Puente condemned the encounter as 'absolute disgrace,' criticizing the king for photographing with Negre, the founder of EDATV. The video showed Negre approaching the monarch, shaking his hand, exchanging words, and requesting a photo, which the king agreed to. Puente argued that such interactions could damage the royal image and questioned the appropriateness of the meeting, given Negre’s history of spreading misinformation and targeting progressive politicians. Negre defended the encounter, calling it normal and accusing the government of corruption, while the PP criticized Puente and linked the controversy to the migration crisis in Ceuta.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the interaction between the king and Javier Negre as inappropriate and damaging to the monarchy's image, using strong negative language toward Negre, describing him as a 'professional of defamation and misinformation' and an 'ultra-right activist.' It emphasizes the minister's dis

Why factuality (90): The article offers a comprehensive account of the event, including the location, timing, and reactions from both Puente and Negre. It accurately summarizes the cross-source consensus and includes details from official statements and public responses.

Why objectivity (55): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but still emphasizes Puente’s criticisms more than Negre’s defense. It avoids overtly emotional language but shows slight bias in favor of the government’s position.

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 5012 days ago
Óscar Puente censors the King's inn in Colombia with a journalist: "It is not innocuous with whom he is photographed" and "contaminates his image"

Minister of Transport Óscar Puente has criticized King Felipe VI for posing for a photo with journalist Javier Negre during his visit to Colombia, calling the act 'an absolute disgrace.' Puente expressed this criticism on social media platform X, arguing that the king, as a symbol, should not be photographed with individuals who may compromise his image. The incident follows a video showing Negre approaching the king and requesting a photograph. Negre responded by accusing Puente of hypocrisy, pointing out that the king was forced to greet representatives of a corrupt government blocking his access to Ceuta. The exchange escalated into personal attacks, with Puente labeling Negre as a 'virus' and criticizing him for associating with terrorists. Puente further outlined four reasons why he considers the photo session inappropriate, including allegations of insults toward the queen and accusations of defamation and ultra-right activism against progressive politicians.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the monarchy's symbolic role and criticizes the journalist for associating with politically controversial figures. While the article presents both perspectives, it emphasizes the monarchy's sanctity and portrays the journalist as a problematic figure engaged

Why factuality (80): The article summarizes Puente’s criticism of the king’s actions, including his labeling of Negre as an 'activista de ultraderecha.' It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides context about the political tensions involved.

Why objectivity (50): The language used is somewhat confrontational, especially when describing Puente’s response to Negre. While factual, it lacks balance by underrepresenting Negre’s viewpoint and focusing primarily on the criticism.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories