ON
← Back to feed
We got rid of foreign occupiers and armies, but how are we going to get rid of HDZ's poison?
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive6 days ago

We got rid of foreign occupiers and armies, but how are we going to get rid of HDZ's poison?

Saborska zastupnica DOSIP-a Dalija Orešković, u intervjuu za N1, komentariše problem toksičnog otpada u Gospiću i očekivanja od današnje sjednice saborskog Odbora za zaštitu okoliša. Sjednica, koja je bila odgođena zbog požara u Omišu, treba obraditi slučaj odlagališta otpada. Orešković ističe da građani očekuju jasne odgovore i saniranje otpada, dok se boji da će HDZ pokušati skrenuti pozornost s teme putem sabotiranja i distrakcije. Ona navodi da će na sjednicu doći i ljudi izvan saborskog radnog tijela, uključujući gradonačelnika Gospića Darka Milinovića, koji će pokušati prebaciti pažnju na druge teme. Orešković smatra da je sjednica važna za shranjivanje strukture koja organizira ilegalna odlagališta toksičnog otpada, koje su po njezinim riječima pretvorena u 'mafiju' koja djeluje kroz institucije.

The extraordinary session of the Parliamentary Environmental Protection Committee scheduled for today in Gospić has been postponed due to the catastrophic fire in Omiš. The decision was announced on social media by the initiative "Gospić is Our Home," which shared the reason for the delay. The meeting, originally set for 4 pm, will now take place on Monday, August 17, 2026. The postponement comes amid ongoing concerns over toxic waste dumping in Gospić, particularly at the Silosa site, where hazardous substances have reportedly been stored for years. The committee was intended to address this issue, with Minister of Health Irena Hrstić expected to attend. She had visited Omiš earlier in the day alongside Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. The delay follows a series of protests in Gospić, where residents have raised alarms over the environmental impact of illegal waste disposal. For nearly two years, local activists and journalists have documented the presence of toxic waste, including heavy metals and persistent chemicals, in the area. Demonstrations have grown in scale, with hundreds gathering regularly to demand action. Despite these efforts, little progress has been made, leading to frustration among locals who feel their voices are ignored. Reports indicate that the waste, originating from industrial sites in Europe, has been illegally imported into Croatia, often bypassing regulatory controls. This has sparked questions about the role of government agencies in preventing such imports. Saborska zastupnica DOSIP-a, Dalija Orešković, has taken to social media to highlight the growing crisis. In a recent post, she criticized the ruling party, HDZ, and its leadership for failing to address the issue. Orešković questioned how hazardous waste, which European countries refuse to accept, could end up in Croatia. She described the situation as one of systemic neglect, noting that waste is left exposed to the elements for years, contaminating air, water, and soil. Her comments were directed at both political leaders and the public, urging them to recognize the severity of the problem. She emphasized that the issue extends beyond Gospić, affecting the entire country. Orešković further accused the HDZ of obstructing efforts to hold accountable those responsible for importing and disposing of toxic waste. She pointed to the lack of infrastructure in Croatia for handling such materials, stating that even basic waste management systems are lacking. She called for transparency, suggesting that the Security Intelligence Agency should investigate claims circulating among citizens about the origins of the waste. Her remarks were sharp, indicating a deepening divide between the government and the affected communities. She concluded by directly implicating Prime Minister Plenković, questioning whether he would continue to ignore the ecological disaster unfolding in his country. In a separate report from Slobodna Dalmacija, a journalist detailed the chaotic conditions at the Silosa site. Residents describe the area as a wasteland, with tons of hazardous material piled high and unregulated. The waste includes chlorine, heavy metals, and long-lasting chemicals, all of which pose serious health risks. The site, once a former industrial plant known as "Velebit," remains open and accessible, despite repeated calls for closure. Activists claim that the waste has been accumulating for years, with no visible effort to contain or remove it. They argue that the government has failed to act, leaving the community to suffer the consequences. The situation has reached a boiling point, with reports of increased public unrest. Protests have become more frequent, drawing large crowds who demand immediate intervention. Some residents have expressed anger at the government’s perceived indifference, while others remain hopeful that the upcoming parliamentary session might finally bring change. However, many fear that the meeting will be used as a platform for political maneuvering rather than meaningful reform. Activists warn that without decisive action, the contamination of land, water, and air will continue to worsen, threatening the health and future of the region.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709 days ago
The toxic waste session in Gospić has been postponed because of the fire in Omiš:

An extraordinary session of the County Assembly's Environmental Protection Committee in Gospić, originally scheduled today at 4 PM, has been postponed due to a fire in Omiš. The meeting was intended to address concerns over toxic waste at a local landfill, which reportedly contains hazardous substances. The postponement was announced by the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' on Facebook, expressing solidarity with Omiš and the firefighters battling the blaze. The session is now set for Monday, August 17, 2026. Health Minister Irena Hrstić was expected to attend but instead visited Omiš today alongside Prime Minister Andrej Plenković.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a postponed environmental committee meeting related to toxic waste, which is a public policy issue. It provides balanced information, including the reason for the postponement, the planned agenda, and the involvement of government officials. There is no evident bias in the phr

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the postponement of the environmental council meeting due to the fire in Omiš, citing the primary source document from N1. It includes details about the toxic waste site and the new date, aligning with the original report. However, it adds information about the ministe

Why objectivity (70): The tone is supportive and empathetic towards the affected areas, using phrases like 'Izdržite, dragi naši' which convey emotional support. While this is appropriate given the context of a disaster, it introduces a level of sentimentality that may bias the narrative slightly.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6510 days ago
Orešković about the waste in Gospić: Does the SOA check what is being whispered among citizens?

Saborska zastupnica DOSIP-a Dalija Orešković objavila je na Facebooku status u kojemu je kritikovala HDZ i premijera Andreja Plenkovića zbog problema s otpadom u Gospiću i Hrvatskoj. U statusu navodi da otpad koji se u Europi ne može zbrinuti, ušao je u Hrvatsku i ostao izložen prirodnim faktorima, uz potencijalnu opasnost za stanovnike. Orešković naglašava da problem nije ograničen samo na lokaciju Silosa, već i na druga mjestaa poput Rakitovca, te pita o kontroli ulaska otpada i tvrtkama koje ga uvoze. Također podcrtava nedostatak sustava za reciklažu i zbrinjavanje otpada, te pita je li Sigurnosno-obavještajna agencija (SOA) provjeravala informacije koje se šuškaju među građanima. Na kraju odgovornost izravno povezuje s premijerom Plenkovićem.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikl kritizira vladicu i HDZ, posebno premijera Plenkovića, koristeći optužbe protiv njegovog vodstva u pitanju ekološkog zagađivanja. Kritika je usmjerena prema političkom vodećem stranki, a izrazito su naglašeni problemi s upravljanjem otpadom i nedostatak sustava za zbrinjavanje, što se smatrao

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković's Facebook post criticizing HDZ and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over waste issues in Gospić. It includes direct quotes from her statements and provides specific details about the alleged waste situation, aligning with the cross-source consensus tha

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear political slant, favoring Orešković’s perspective and using emotionally charged language such as 'HDZ građanima poručuje da ne budu histerični.' The framing emphasizes criticism of the government without presenting counterarguments or providing context on the government's res

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7011 days ago
PHOTO: See aerial footage from Gospić, no one is storing tons of poison: On Sunday thousands of people will come

The article discusses ongoing concerns in Gospić regarding toxic waste stored in open areas, which has been a point of contention for over a year. Residents have protested since February of the previous year after Europol discovered hazardous waste being dumped there. Despite these protests, no significant action has been taken by authorities, leading to frustration among locals. The article highlights the lack of oversight and security around the site, with reports that the area remains accessible and unmonitored. It also criticizes the government’s handling of the situation, suggesting that officials have downplayed the issue, contributing to a sense of complacency among residents.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation in Gospić as a failure of government action and expresses strong criticism toward officials, implying negligence and a lack of accountability. The tone suggests a clear stance against the current administration's handling of environmental issues, aligning more with a

Why factuality (80): The article covers the environmental concerns and political reactions, including statements from Premier Plenković and the opposition. It reflects the primary source's content accurately, though it adds some context about the public's reaction and institutional responses.

Why objectivity (70): There is a slight tilt towards criticizing the opposition for creating hysteria, while also acknowledging the government's attempts to address the issue. The balance is somewhat uneven.

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 5012 days ago
Orešković calls for a general uprising over Gospić: "What else do we have to talk about?

Dalija Orešković, saborska zastupnica HDZ-a, reagira na slučaj nezakonito odloženog opasnog otpada u Gospiću, optužujući državne institucije i vlast za omogućavanje dugotrajne akumulacije toksičnog smeća. U objavi na Facebooku, Orešković naglašava potencijalne štete za vodu, hranu, tlo i ekosustav, te traži prijevremene izbore ili masovne prosvjede. Njena poruka sadrži kritiku dužnosti predsjednika Andreja Plenkovića, kojeg opisuje kao „sliku Plenkovićeve Hrvatske“, i ukazuje na veze između HDZ-a i kompanija koje pružaju usluge za skladištenje otpada. Orešković također podseća na rizik da bi otpad iz Gospića bio visok 6 metara ako se stavi na Trg bana Jelačića, što joj služi kao simbol za opasnost koju HDZ ne želi riješiti.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of toxic waste accumulation in Gospić as a systemic failure of the ruling HDZ party and its institutions, using strong accusatory language ('HDZ-ova vlast', 'kriminalci', 'profit HDZ-ovih donatora') to implicate the governing party in environmental harm. The call for 'př

Why factuality (65): The article captures the essence of Orešković's concerns but uses highly emotive and polemical language not directly quoted from the primary source. It emphasizes the political blame game over the technical and environmental aspects.

Why objectivity (50): The article has a very strong oppositional tone, using inflammatory language and framing the situation as a deliberate attack by the ruling party, which strongly influences the narrative.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 55Objective 456 days ago
We got rid of foreign occupiers and armies, but how are we going to get rid of HDZ's poison?

Saborska zastupnica DOSIP-a Dalija Orešković, u intervjuu za N1, komentariše problem toksičnog otpada u Gospiću i očekivanja od današnje sjednice saborskog Odbora za zaštitu okoliša. Sjednica, koja je bila odgođena zbog požara u Omišu, treba obraditi slučaj odlagališta otpada. Orešković ističe da građani očekuju jasne odgovore i saniranje otpada, dok se boji da će HDZ pokušati skrenuti pozornost s teme putem sabotiranja i distrakcije. Ona navodi da će na sjednicu doći i ljudi izvan saborskog radnog tijela, uključujući gradonačelnika Gospića Darka Milinovića, koji će pokušati prebaciti pažnju na druge teme. Orešković smatra da je sjednica važna za shranjivanje strukture koja organizira ilegalna odlagališta toksičnog otpada, koje su po njezinim riječima pretvorena u 'mafiju' koja djeluje kroz institucije.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of toxic waste management in Gospić through the lens of institutional corruption and political sabotage by the HDZ, which the speaker associates with a 'mafia' operating within institutions. The tone suggests skepticism toward the ruling party’s ability to address the cr

Why factuality (55): The article reports on the postponed meeting and the issue of waste disposal in Gospić, aligning with the primary source document. It includes details about the protest and the politician Dalija Orešković’s comments. However, it introduces political commentary and accusations against the HDZ party,

Why objectivity (45): The tone is clearly critical of the HDZ party, using strong language like 'trollovi' and 'smijurija', indicating a partisan perspective. The article frames the situation through the lens of political opposition, lacking neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories