Orešković on the waste affair in Gospić: Does the SOA check what is being whispered among citizens?

Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 702 days ago

The Croatian Parliament (Sabor) rejected all four proposals by President Zoran Milanović regarding the illegal waste dump in Gospić, opting instead for conclusions proposed by the ruling majority. These conclusions call on the government to submit a report on the progress of the cleanup within 90 days. Opposition representatives criticized the lack of concrete solutions and clear deadlines for addressing the environmental issue. Vjeko Bušić, a member of the 'Gospić je naš dom' civic initiative, expressed disappointment with the parliamentary outcome, emphasizing the need for urgent and professional action. He highlighted that authorities knew about the problem since 2023 but failed to act until late 2024. Bušić expects a large demonstration in Zagreb on September 5th, involving people from across Croatia, as the issue is not isolated to Gospić.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of the current system and emphasizes the need for urgent action, which aligns with left-wing concerns over governmental accountability and environmental protection. The focus on systemic failures and calls for stronger oversight reflect a progressive slt

Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the parliamentary decision regarding the rejection of the president’s proposals and the acceptance of the ruling majority’s conclusions. It includes direct quotes from Vjekoslav Bušić and aligns closely with the primary source document, though it slightly simplifies

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but still shows a slight preference for the perspective of the opposition and the grassroots initiative. While it avoids overtly biased language, it frames the situation in a way that emphasizes the shortcomings of the current system.

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago

Saborska zastupnica Dalija Orešković objavila je komentar na Facebooku o slučaju ilegalnog odlaganja otpada u Gospiću, povezujući ga s nedostatkom nadzora i propusta u hrvatskom sustavu. Otkrio je da otpad, koji sadrži opasne tvari, nije mogao biti prihvaćen ni jednim od šezdesetak odlagališta u Europi, a stoji godinama u vrećama izložen vremenskim uvjetima. Orešković upozorila je na moguće posljedice za stanovništvo i podzemne vode, pitanjem kako je otpad mogao biti uvezen u Hrvatsku, uz pitanje carinske kontrole i licenci tvrtki. Pridružila je se istragi USKOK-a o sumnjama na organiziranu ilegalnu manipulaciju otpadom, koja uključuje lokacije u Varaždinu, Benkovačkom Selu i Senju, te tvrtke iz Hrvatske, Slovenije i Italije. Utvrdilo se da je na području Gospića zakopano oko 37.000 tona otpada, uključujući elektronički otpad, medicinski otpad i RDF, s visokim koncentracijama PFAS spojeva i bakra u podzemnim vodama.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of illegal waste dumping in Gospić as a systemic failure linked to the Croatian government and Premier Andrej Plenković, using critical language toward state institutions like SOA. The focus on governmental responsibility and the implication that officials are complicit,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the statements made by Jure Zubčić and Silvana Čeko Jurišić, discussing the real concerns of the citizens and the responsibility of the premier. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context about past incidents and institutional failures.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is supportive of the citizens' concerns and critical of the government's response, indicating a slight lean towards the opposition's perspective.

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago

Dušica Radojčić, predsjednica saborskog Odbora za zaštitu okoliša i zastupnica stranke Možemo!, naveo je da će zatražiti javno saslušanje u vezi s deponijom otpada u Gospiću, uz naglasavanje da je to bolji alat za utvrđivanje odgovornosti. Njena pozivnica je usmjerena prema tome da se utvrdi konačna odgovornost za prevoz 600 kamiona otpada preko granice, što je prema njoj nedopušteno. Radojčić je također pominjala nedostatak djelovanja službi koje nadziru takve postupke, te naglašava potrebu za transparentnošću i procjenu rizika za zdravlje stanovništva. Ona je izrazila nadu da će na sjednici čuti nove informacije i da će se utvrditi propusti koji su doprinijeli situaciji. Uz to, napisala je da Hrvatska postaje „otpadni Eldorado“ za one koji žele brzo riješiti otpad, a da se šteta sanira na računu građana.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel fokusira na kritiku vlade i političkih stranaka kao što je HDZ, koristeći opsesivno pitanje o odgovornosti i propustima u upravljanju otpadom. Korištenje izraza „Eldorado“ za opis Hrvatske sugerira kritički stav prema političkim autoritetima. Naglasavanje potrebe za javnim saslušanjem kao me

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the political developments around the illegal waste disposal issue in Lika, including the call for public hearings by Dušica Radojčić and the opposition's stance. It references the primary source document regarding the parliamentary majority and the potential for an

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat emotionally charged, particularly when describing the situation in Lika as 'otpadni Eldorado,' which implies a strong negative judgment. The article also frames the opposition's actions as necessary and justified, showing some bias towards the environmental activists' perspectiv

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65yesterday

In Zagreb, a large protest is being organized by the civil initiative 'Gospić is our home' and their sister organization 'Lika ecological action' on September 5th against dangerous waste that has been illegally dumped in Bilajska Street in Gospić over the years. The organizers emphasize that the protest will not include space for politicians or their representatives, stating they are solely activists and local residents. They reject claims that members of the initiative are connected to the political party Možemo! and insist they have no ties to politics. The group expresses dissatisfaction with the conclusions of the ruling majority adopted at an extraordinary session of the Parliament, arguing that timely institutional responses could have prevented the pollution and that the current conclusions lack concrete solutions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a grassroots movement opposing political inaction and institutional failure, emphasizing the disconnect between citizens and politicians. It highlights the frustration with the ruling majority’s conclusions, implying a left-leaning critique of political elites. The措

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the planned protest in Zagreb and quotes Vjekoslav Bušić from the initiative. It mentions the rejection of the president’s proposals by the parliament and the adoption of the ruling majority’s conclusions. However, it omits some specific details from the primary source

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear bias against the political system and the ruling majority, using phrases like 'we have no connection to politics' and implying criticism toward the government. The tone is somewhat confrontational and lacks neutrality in presenting the situation.

Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 8511 days ago

Marija Selak Raspudić, a member of the parliamentary group Drita, has called for serious institutional action regarding the case of hazardous waste being dumped in Gospić, Croatia. She stated that this incident could have significant political consequences for Prime Minister Andrej Plenković’s government, potentially leading to its downfall. Raspudić emphasized the need for an official response and criticized the lack of unified opposition action against the government. She specifically addressed President Zoran Milanović, urging him to convene an extraordinary session of parliament to hold the government accountable. Raspudić argued that Milanović, as the president, has the constitutional authority to take such steps and that his failure to act undermines the system of checks and balances.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a potential crisis for the current government and emphasizes the need for institutional accountability, particularly calling out the president for inaction. The tone suggests criticism of the ruling party and advocacy for stronger opposition actions, aligning with

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reflects the content of the primary source, mentioning the potential for an extraordinary session of parliament and the involvement of various political figures. It aligns well with the procedural details provided in the original document.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents a balanced view, discussing both the concerns raised by the opposition and the need for a unified response. It avoids taking sides and focuses on the political dynamics without injecting personal opinions.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 757 days ago

Residents of Gospić protested against the accumulation of waste in the town, expressing fear of contamination and stating that many no longer drink tap water due to concerns over safety. The protest was organized by Mile Ilić, representing the Citizens' Association for the Rescue of Like, who criticized local authorities and institutions for failing to address the issue for 18 months. Ilić questioned how 40 trucks could have passed through customs without being stopped, suggesting negligence by police and urban planners. He also held the municipal company responsible for knowing about the incoming waste and managing it properly. The National Assembly Committee for Environmental Protection and Nature is set to meet in the area.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of government and institutional oversight, emphasizing the lack of action by authorities and questioning their accountability. It highlights the residents' distrust in official bodies and criticizes the government's inaction, which aligns with a leftward

Why factuality (80): This article provides details about the protest organized by Mile Ilić, highlighting community concerns over waste management and health risks. It includes quotes from local residents and organizers, which align with the primary source document discussing similar issues. The article also mentions le

Why objectivity (75): The article has a slightly more activist tone, emphasizing the frustration of the community and questioning the effectiveness of institutions. While it presents facts, it leans towards portraying the authorities as negligent, which introduces a slight bias toward the protesters’ perspective.

Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 758 days ago

The article discusses the growing public concern over hazardous waste accumulation in Gospić, Croatia, which has become a politically significant issue after 18 months. The ruling coalition held an emergency meeting, and Prime Minister Plenković announced accelerated pollution cleanup and proposed adding 'ecocide' as a severe criminal offense against the environment. Increased water testing and opposition demands for extraordinary sessions of the Parliament, cabinet resignations, and early elections are mentioned. However, the author criticizes the delayed political response, noting that the issue was known for eight years but ignored until recently. The article questions why the government did not act sooner and highlights the lack of public engagement during this period.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the delay in political action as a failure of governance, emphasizing public frustration and questioning the government's accountability. It uses emotionally charged language ('gnusnim činom', 'histerija') and implies systemic neglect, aligning with left-leaning critiques of state

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the protest and the concerns raised by citizens about the waste issue. It references the 37,000 tons of waste but does not include direct quotes from the RTL interview with Minister Vučković.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting both citizen concerns and the need for action, avoiding overtly biased language.

tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 757 days ago

Hundreds of citizens gathered in Gospić on Sunday morning at Trg Stjepana Radića for a protest against hazardous waste and fear of environmental pollution in Lika. The event was organized by local activists, including Mile Ilić, who warned that areas such as Gospić, Otočac, Udbina, Perušić, and Gračac are threatened by pollution. Participants wore banners with messages like 'Liku su izdali i zavili u crno' and 'Otrovali su vodu, tlo i zrak,' emphasizing the urgency of the issue. Politicians such as Dalija Orešković and Tomislav Jonjić attended the demonstration. Organizers called for specific actions from relevant authorities to address the environmental concerns.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a grassroots movement highlighting environmental injustice and corporate negligence, using emotionally charged language ('prsten zla,' 'pošasti') that aligns with left-wing critiques of industrial harm. While the event includes politicians from various parties, the

Why factuality (70): The article accurately describes the protest but lacks specific details about the environmental issues discussed in the primary source. It focuses more on the protest itself rather than the underlying issues.

Why objectivity (75): The article uses emotive language and phrases like 'prsten zla' ('ring of evil') which can be seen as biased and potentially inflammatory.