ON
← Back to feed
We have confirmation that groundwater and soil are contaminated with hazardous chemicals.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservativesyesterday

We have confirmation that groundwater and soil are contaminated with hazardous chemicals.

Predsjednik Mosta Nikola Grmoja, u Splitu, kritizira vladajuće za odbijanje zaključaka o hitnoj sanaciji opasnog otpada u Lici, te zaštiti tla, podzemnih voda i vode za piće. Grmoja navodi potvrdu glavnog državnog odvjetnika da su podzemne vode i tlo zaražena opasnim kemikalijama, a ocjenjuje da se javnost pokušava uvjeriti da nema opasnosti. On uspoređuje situaciju s domaćinstvom gdje se ignoriše početna šteta. Grmoja također kritizira vladajuće za njihovo ponašanje pri odbijanju oporbenih zaključaka, nazivajući to sramotom. Objašnjava da će Most nastaviti raditi na temi, posebno ističući zastupnika Troskota, te najavljuje nove inicijative za zaštitu hrvatskog krša i vodnih bogatstava. Naglašava da je problem otpada zajednički za cijelu Hrvatsku i da država ne smije ostati nijema na slučajevima ilegalašnog odlaganja opasnog otpada. Također poziva članove Mosta da sudjeluju na prosvjedu 5. rujna u Zagrebu i da podrže inicijativu za opoziv Vlade.

The ruling party in Croatia has rejected conclusions calling for urgent waste cleanup in the Lika region, according to Nikola Grmoja, president of the Most parliamentary group. Speaking in Split on Saturday, Grmoja criticized the government for its decision during an extraordinary session of the Croatian Parliament to reject all proposals aimed at immediate action against hazardous waste in Lika and regular reporting on the condition of soil, groundwater, and drinking water. He emphasized that the government's refusal to act on these issues undermines public trust and highlights a lack of responsibility toward environmental protection. Grmoja cited confirmation from the chief state prosecutor regarding allegations published in July that indicate groundwater and soil have already been contaminated with dangerous chemicals. He argued that the government’s focus on clean air and safe drinking water while ignoring the contamination of soil and groundwater is akin to saying “the second floor has air conditioning” when the first floor is on fire. He further accused the ruling party of boasting about having gathered enough votes to reject opposition proposals, calling this a reflection of their weakness, recklessness, and willingness to sacrifice valuable resources, such as water and the environment, for financial gain before concealing the damage caused. Despite the rejection, Grmoja stated that Most will continue working on the issue, particularly highlighting the efforts of MP Zvonimir Troskot, who has systematically addressed the problem over months through fieldwork with residents in Lika. He announced new initiatives aimed at protecting Croatia’s karst terrain, soil, and water resources, emphasizing that the group would not be discouraged by the recent vote. The planned demonstration in Zagreb on September 5, he noted, is organized by civil initiatives from Lika and does not involve political parties, urging members and supporters of Most to participate and show solidarity with Lika residents. Grmoja pointed out that everyone in Croatia faces challenges related to waste, illegal landfills, and hazardous materials, stating that the issue affects all citizens. He raised concerns about the possibility of a state inspector accepting bribes to overlook the import of hazardous waste from Italy, warning that Croatia must not remain silent in such cases. On the topic of gathering signatures for a motion of no confidence in the government, he stressed the necessity of such an initiative and pledged Most’s support, acknowledging that the ruling party would likely reject it again using their majority but seeing it as an opportunity to reiterate key points and push for swift action on the cleanup. He recalled that Most was the first to raise the question of a no-confidence vote and had invited the entire opposition to a meeting, though no one responded. Despite this, Most signed the initiative proposed by the left-wing opposition. As a potential model for addressing the situation, Grmoja suggested organizing a public tender to select a manager responsible for leading the urgent cleanup of hazardous waste, not just in Lika but throughout Croatia, under the supervision of a multi-party parliamentary committee. This approach, he explained, would ensure clear accountability and oversight. When asked about the resignation of Ernest Petry, Grmoja declined to comment, repeating his previous stance that it is not within his level of responsibility. He urged others who were affected by Petry’s membership in the Presidency to address the matter instead.

2 reports

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 60yesterday
Grmoja: The government rejected the conclusions on waste disposal in Lica

Nikola Grmoja, predsjednik stranke Most, kritizira vladajuće za odbijanje zaključaka o hitnoj sanaciji opasnog otpada u Lici, nakon što su glavni državni odvjetnik potvrdio da su podzemne vode i tlo zaražena kemikalijama. Grmoja navodi primjere kako vladajući ignoriraju opasnosti i prikrivaju trovanje voda, uspoređujući to s situacijom gdje se gori prvi kat kuće, dok se govorilo o drugom katu. On također naglašava da će Most nastaviti raditi na temi, posebno ističući zastupnika Zvonimira Troskota, i najavi nove inicijative za zaštitu tla i vodnih bogatstava. Prosvjeta protiv ilegala otpada planira se 5. rujna u Zagrebu, a Grmoja ističe da nije povezana s političkim strankama, već s građanskim inicijativama. Također je osvrtan prikupljanje potpisa za nepovjerenje Vladi.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of the ruling authorities to address environmental concerns, using strong criticism of their actions and decisions. The tone suggests a left-leaning perspective by emphasizing the importance of protecting natural resources and holding the government accounta

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a protest organized by Most against the government's rejection of environmental conclusions regarding hazardous waste in Lici. It cites statements from Nikola Grmoja, including references to a confirmation from the chief state prosecutor about contaminated groundwater and soil

Why objectivity (60): The tone is clearly critical of the government, using emotionally charged metaphors like comparing the situation to a house fire. The article frames the government as negligent and dishonest, which introduces bias. There is no attempt to present alternative viewpoints or balance the narrative.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 60yesterday
We have confirmation that groundwater and soil are contaminated with hazardous chemicals.

Predsjednik Mosta Nikola Grmoja, u Splitu, kritizira vladajuće za odbijanje zaključaka o hitnoj sanaciji opasnog otpada u Lici, te zaštiti tla, podzemnih voda i vode za piće. Grmoja navodi potvrdu glavnog državnog odvjetnika da su podzemne vode i tlo zaražena opasnim kemikalijama, a ocjenjuje da se javnost pokušava uvjeriti da nema opasnosti. On uspoređuje situaciju s domaćinstvom gdje se ignoriše početna šteta. Grmoja također kritizira vladajuće za njihovo ponašanje pri odbijanju oporbenih zaključaka, nazivajući to sramotom. Objašnjava da će Most nastaviti raditi na temi, posebno ističući zastupnika Troskota, te najavljuje nove inicijative za zaštitu hrvatskog krša i vodnih bogatstava. Naglašava da je problem otpada zajednički za cijelu Hrvatsku i da država ne smije ostati nijema na slučajevima ilegalašnog odlaganja opasnog otpada. Također poziva članove Mosta da sudjeluju na prosvjedu 5. rujna u Zagrebu i da podrže inicijativu za opoziv Vlade.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of the ruling government to act on environmental concerns, emphasizing their neglect of scientific findings and public health risks. The tone criticizes the ruling authorities' decisions as irresponsible and self-serving, aligning more with left-wing values.

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the content of the first, providing similar details about the protest and the government's rejection of environmental conclusions. It also mentions the confirmation from the chief state prosecutor and uses identical phrasing. Like the first article, it lacks a primary source but

Why objectivity (60): Similar to the first article, this piece presents a strongly negative view of the government, using emotive language and metaphorical expressions. It does not offer counterpoints or alternative perspectives, maintaining a one-sided critique.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories