This opinion piece critiques the Marcos administration's inability to arrest several high-profile fugitives, including Gerald Bantag, Harry Roque, Atong Ang, Zaldy Co, and Bato dela Rosa. It highlights the failure to capture these individuals despite their alleged involvement in crimes such as murder, kidnapping, and corruption. The article references the unsolved killing of journalist Percy Lapid, whose case was linked to Bantag, and notes that Bantag remains at large despite court warrants. It also discusses the ongoing legal issues surrounding Harry Roque, a former Duterte aide, and Atong Ang, accused of orchestrating the disappearance of cockfighting enthusiasts. Additionally, it questions the fate of Zaldy Co, a former congressman allegedly involved in flood control corruption, after reports claimed he was detained in the Czech Republic but whose current status remains unclear.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective on the Marcos administration's handling of fugitives and corruption cases, implying inefficiency and lack of accountability. The tone suggests skepticism toward the government's actions and highlights failures in justice delivery, aligning with a left-wing
Why factuality (78): The article provides specific details about fugitives like Gerald Bantag, Harry Roque, and Atong Ang, citing events such as Percy Lapid's death in 2022 and the subsequent investigation. It also references the 2024 POGO ban and Roque's 2025 warrant. However, some details lack precise dates or sources
Why objectivity (55): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'slippery as an eel,' 'hard-hitting broadcaster,' and 'fearless radioman,' which suggests bias toward criticizing the Marcos administration. It frames the fugitives as threats to justice and implies the administration is ineffective, showing a cl



