ON
← Back to feed
They were illegal demands: contractors who denounced corruption of a Chinese company in charge of the construction of the metro speak in SEMANA
CO🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

They were illegal demands: contractors who denounced corruption of a Chinese company in charge of the construction of the metro speak in SEMANA

The Colombian newspaper SEMANA reported on allegations of corruption involving a Chinese construction firm, part of the Metro Line 1 consortium responsible for Bogotá’s subway project. The report includes an exclusive video showing a Chinese businessman receiving 60 million pesos in cash, allegedly as part of illegal demands for payment of overdue invoices. In response, the Metro Line 1 consortium denied the claims, stating the situation was based on a contractual agreement between subcontractor Ubeam Unit and the temporary union Metrobuild. However, lawyers representing the contractors argue that there was no such agreement and that the demands were illegal. They emphasized that the evidence, including conversations and financial records, supports their claim and urged the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate swiftly, including holding accountable the Chinese officials involved.

A video obtained by Semana has surfaced showing a Chinese businessman linked to the Metro Line 1 consortium in Bogotá accepting cash payments allegedly tied to extortion. The footage, now in the possession of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, captures a meeting between representatives of a Colombian subcontractor and officials from the Chinese company China Harbour Engineering Company Limited Colombia (CHEC), which is part of the consortium responsible for constructing the city's first subway line. The incident took place in April 2026 in the Teusaquillo district, where the former offices of CHEC were located before being converted into a hotel with oriental-themed signage. The video shows the exchange occurring in the office of CHEC, now repurposed as a hotel. It depicts a conversation between a Colombian contractor and a Chinese official, who appears to be handling the transaction. The dialogue is conducted in English, with the Colombian representative explaining the need to settle outstanding accounts and invoices amounting to billions of pesos. At one point, the contractor retrieves a black bag from his briefcase and hands it over to the Chinese official. The man in question, later identified in the complaint as Yang, the commercial manager of CHEC, begins counting stacks of cash, taking approximately ten minutes to tally the sum. According to the footage, the transaction involves 60 million pesos in cash, distributed in bundles of five million each. Yang, who does not speak Spanish, counts the money with precision, demonstrating familiarity with such procedures. After completing the count, he writes down the transaction in his notebook, seemingly documenting a receipt. The note indicates pending payments owed to the Chinese side totaling 960 million pesos. However, the Colombian contractors deny owing this amount, asserting instead that they were seeking payment for invoices that had been marked in red by the Chinese firm. The video lasts 26 minutes and begins with the entry of the individuals into the office. The scene unfolds with the two men seated at a table, engaged in discussion. A third person, likely another official from CHEC, is present during the exchange. This individual collects the bundles of cash and places them back into the same black bag from which they were taken. As the conversation progresses, the three individuals stand up, shake hands, and exit the room. The video ends with the third person quickly leaving the office with the bag containing the cash. The incident has sparked a formal investigation by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which has received the video as evidence. The case highlights ongoing concerns regarding corruption within major infrastructure projects in Bogotá, particularly those involving international consortia. The Metro Line 1 project, valued at billions of pesos, has faced delays and allegations of mismanagement in the past. The current situation underscores the challenges of overseeing large-scale public works in a context where financial transparency remains a contentious issue. The involvement of CHEC, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned enterprise China Harbour Engineering Company, adds complexity to the case. While the company denies any wrongdoing, the video presents a clear visual record of the alleged transaction. Further details will emerge as the investigation proceeds, potentially leading to legal action against those implicated. For now, the footage stands as a critical piece of evidence in what could become a high-profile case of corruption in Colombia's public sector.

2 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 65yesterday
They were illegal demands: contractors who denounced corruption of a Chinese company in charge of the construction of the metro speak in SEMANA

The Colombian newspaper SEMANA reported on allegations of corruption involving a Chinese construction firm, part of the Metro Line 1 consortium responsible for Bogotá’s subway project. The report includes an exclusive video showing a Chinese businessman receiving 60 million pesos in cash, allegedly as part of illegal demands for payment of overdue invoices. In response, the Metro Line 1 consortium denied the claims, stating the situation was based on a contractual agreement between subcontractor Ubeam Unit and the temporary union Metrobuild. However, lawyers representing the contractors argue that there was no such agreement and that the demands were illegal. They emphasized that the evidence, including conversations and financial records, supports their claim and urged the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate swiftly, including holding accountable the Chinese officials involved.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against the Chinese consortium as illegal and unethical, using strong language like 'exigencias ilegales' and emphasizing the need for accountability. While the consortium denies the claims, the article highlights the perspective of the contractors who feel wronged

Why factuality (80): This article provides more precise information, including the specific amount of 60 million pesos in cash and quotes directly from the response by Metro Línea 1. This adds clarity and supports the factual claims made in the first article. However, it still relies on the same video evidence and lacks

Why objectivity (65): While slightly more neutral than the first article, it still leans toward the perspective of the accusers, quoting their lawyer’s statements while only briefly mentioning the defense. The tone remains somewhat biased, emphasizing the 'conclusive' nature of the evidence without fully exploring altern

Semana logoSemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 603 days ago
Exclusive: Scandalous video shows a Chinese businessman, from the Consortium Metro Line 1 of Bogotá, receiving money from an alleged extortion in bags with cash

A video obtained by the Colombian newspaper Semana reveals alleged corruption involving Chinese company CHEC, part of the Metro Line 1 consortium in Bogotá. The footage shows a meeting between a Colombian subcontractor and CHEC officials where cash payments are made in exchange for work on the metro project. The video, which has been shared with prosecutors, depicts the transfer of approximately 60 million pesos in cash, with the Chinese representative allegedly recording the transaction as a receipt. The incident involves disputes over outstanding invoices, with both parties claiming the other owes money. The case highlights ongoing allegations of corruption within the construction sector.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the corruption scandal as a clear violation of ethical standards, emphasizing the involvement of foreign entities in local governance. It presents the actions of the Chinese representatives as unethical and illegal, aligning with progressive values against corporate misconduct. Sf

Why factuality (75): The article presents specific details such as the location (Teusaquillo), the company involved (CHEC), and the nature of the alleged corruption (cash delivery in bags). These claims align with the cross-source consensus, though some contextual elements like the exact amount of money or the full time

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'escandaloso' and 'contundentes,' suggesting a strong moral judgment. It frames the situation as a clear case of corruption without presenting counterarguments from the accused party, creating an imbalanced narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories