ON
← Back to feed
‘On our radar as threat’: Ex-army chief MM Naravane calls China India's competitor, Pakistan a security challenge
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservativeyesterday

‘On our radar as threat’: Ex-army chief MM Naravane calls China India's competitor, Pakistan a security challenge

Former Indian Army Chief Manoj Mukund Naravane discussed the differing nature of threats posed by China and Pakistan during a book launch event. He characterized China as India's 'main competitor' in various domains including politics, economy, trade, and military, emphasizing the need for dialogue and deterrence. In contrast, he viewed Pakistan as a persistent security challenge due to its support for terrorism, noting that India's focus on the western border is driven by this issue. Naravane stressed that while resolving differences with China should prioritize peaceful negotiations, maintaining a strong military presence remains crucial to prevent conflict. He also commented on Pakistan's internal affairs, suggesting that India's non-interference policy applies equally to neighboring nations.

Former Army Chief Manoj Mukund Naravane has categorically stated that China is India’s primary competitor in the coming years, while Pakistan continues to pose a critical security challenge due to its alleged support for terrorism. Speaking at the launch of his book The Curious and the Classified in Pune, Naravane emphasized the distinction between a competitor and an enemy, urging India to pursue diplomatic resolutions with China while maintaining robust military readiness. His remarks underscored the complex geopolitical landscape India navigates, balancing strategic cooperation with persistent threats from its neighbors. Naravane highlighted that India has engaged in major conflicts with both China and Pakistan, noting that these nations remain constant threats on India’s periphery. He acknowledged that current attention is focused on the western border due to Pakistan’s ongoing support for terrorism, though he cautioned that this focus could shift as China’s influence grows. “In the long term and in the years to come, China is going to be our main competitor,” he remarked, using the term “competitor” deliberately to avoid labeling China as an outright adversary. This nuanced approach reflects broader strategic considerations within India’s defense planning. The former Army chief elaborated on the multifaceted nature of India-China relations, asserting that competition will manifest across political, economic, trade, and military domains. He warned that competition often leads to friction, yet stressed that dialogue and negotiation should remain the preferred avenues for resolving disputes. “Taking recourse to the use of force should always be the last resort,” he said, reinforcing the principle that peace requires preparedness for conflict. This perspective aligns with India’s longstanding strategy of maintaining a credible deterrent while pursuing peaceful engagement with its larger neighbor. Naravane also addressed the situation in Pakistan, emphasizing that India respects the nation’s sovereignty and does not interfere in its internal affairs. He reiterated India’s non-interference policy, suggesting that Pakistan should similarly refrain from meddling in India’s domestic matters. This stance reflects a consistent diplomatic posture aimed at fostering stability in South Asia through mutual respect and restraint. Regarding the disputed territory of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK), Naravane referenced a parliamentary resolution from the 1980s affirming that POK is an integral part of India. He clarified that this claim does not necessitate immediate military action, instead framing it as an unresolved legal issue. He further noted that integrating POK would require extensive efforts to win the trust of its inhabitants, drawing parallels to India’s experiences in the northeastern states. This perspective underscores the delicate balance between territorial claims and pragmatic governance. Meanwhile, Indian authorities have intensified counterterrorism operations, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah announcing the arrest of over 200 individuals linked to a terror network associated with Pakistan-based leader Shahzad Bhatti. The operation, conducted across 14 states, targeted a network suspected of orchestrating cross-border attacks and engaging in narco-terrorism. Recovered items, including IEDs, grenades, and surveillance equipment, confirmed the network’s ties to Pakistani intelligence agencies. The government hailed the move as a significant setback for cross-border terrorism, particularly ahead of Independence Day celebrations. Shahzad Bhatti, a fugitive accused of coordinating attacks in northern India, has been implicated in several high-profile incidents, including grenade assaults and bombings. His network, reportedly backed by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been operating through encrypted channels and social media platforms to recruit operatives and plan subversive actions. The recent arrests mark a coordinated effort by Indian security forces to dismantle the network, which has been linked to violent acts targeting law enforcement and civilian populations. The operation highlights the persistent threat posed by transnational terrorism and the necessity for sustained vigilance.

3 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
EAM downplays Pakistan-Turkey-Saudi defence pact: ‘What has it done amid live military situations in these countries?’

India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar expressed skepticism about the significance of the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, questioning its practical impact during ongoing military tensions in the region. He emphasized that India considers developments from countries not aligned with its interests in its security assessments. The agreement, signed on August 7, aims to enhance collective defense cooperation and mutual deterrence among the three nations. India's Ministry of External Affairs stated it is evaluating the pact's implications for national security and regional stability. Jaishankar also highlighted Pakistan's role in using terrorism against neighbors, describing it as unique globally.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Jaishankar's criticism of the defense pact as a legitimate security concern, while emphasizing India's strategic calculations. It highlights Pakistan's alleged use of terrorism, aligning with right-leaning narratives that view Pakistan as a threat. The focus on India's security 'd

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the content of S Jaishankar's statements as quoted from his social media posts. It also correctly identifies the date of the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement and summarizes the joint statement from the three countries. The information aligns with cross-source consensus re

Why objectivity (75): The article presents Jaishankar's skepticism toward the pact's relevance in a somewhat critical tone, suggesting a potential bias. While it does not overtly take sides, the phrasing 'downplays' and the focus on his questioning may imply a subtle editorial stance.

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
253 Detained In 14 States In Crackdown On ISI-Linked Network

The Indian government has detained 253 individuals across 14 states as part of a crackdown on an alleged network linked to the Pakistan-based intelligence agency ISI. The operation was described by Union Home Minister Amit Shah as a significant victory in combating cross-border terrorism.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the operation as a 'major success' against cross-border terrorism, aligning with the government's narrative of national security and law enforcement effectiveness. The emphasis on the home minister's positive assessment suggests a pro-government perspective, highlighting the state

Why factuality (85): The article reports the government's claim of a successful crackdown on an ISI-linked network, citing the number of detainees and the involvement of Union Home Minister Amit Shah. It references official statements and legal actions taken, which align with public records. The information appears to b

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the government's position as a success, it does not include opposing viewpoints or alternative interpretations. The language used ('major success') leans slightly toward a positive spin, though it remains relatively neutral compared to other potential sources.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 652 days ago
‘On our radar as threat’: Ex-army chief MM Naravane calls China India's competitor, Pakistan a security challenge

Former Indian Army Chief Manoj Mukund Naravane discussed the differing nature of threats posed by China and Pakistan during a book launch event. He characterized China as India's 'main competitor' in various domains including politics, economy, trade, and military, emphasizing the need for dialogue and deterrence. In contrast, he viewed Pakistan as a persistent security challenge due to its support for terrorism, noting that India's focus on the western border is driven by this issue. Naravane stressed that while resolving differences with China should prioritize peaceful negotiations, maintaining a strong military presence remains crucial to prevent conflict. He also commented on Pakistan's internal affairs, suggesting that India's non-interference policy applies equally to neighboring nations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced perspective by acknowledging both China and Pakistan as significant challenges but does not overtly favor one over the other. It reports Naravane’s nuanced views without introducing ideological slant, focusing on his strategic assessments rather than promoting a left-

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the statements made by former Army Chief MM Naravane during the launch of his book. It provides direct quotes from Naravane and contextualizes his comments within the broader discussion of India's strategic challenges. However, the article does not provide independent

Why objectivity (65): The article presents Naravane's statements neutrally but includes some emotionally charged language such as 'threat' and 'challenge,' which may imply a certain perspective. While it doesn't overtly take sides, the framing of China as a 'competitor' rather than an 'enemy' suggests a particular strate

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories