Okdiario paid for the defense of Koldo Garcia in the Supreme Court trial
The digital media outlet Okdiario paid 242,000 euros in legal fees to the law firm representing former Spanish government advisor Koldo Garcia during his trials at the National Court and Supreme Court. These payments were made by Dos Mil Palabras S.L., the publisher of Okdiario, directly to the firm where attorney Leticia de la Hoz works. The invoices and bank transfers were submitted to Judge Santiago Pedraz by de la Hoz as evidence in her own investigation under the 'Leire Diez' case, which alleges a criminal network linked to the PSOE aimed at destabilizing judicial proceedings involving party leaders. By providing this documentation, de la Hoz seeks to refute accusations that the Socialist Party funded Garcia's defense, asserting that the payments came exclusively from the media company. The article notes that Okdiario published an interview with Garcia shortly after the first payment was made, in which he criticized Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and other high-ranking PSOE figures.
The publishing company behind the Spanish right-wing digital outlet OkDiario paid 242,000 euros for the legal defense of former government advisor Koldo Garcia, according to invoices submitted this week to the National Court. The payments were made by Dos Mil Palabras SL, the entity that operates OkDiario, to the law firm IDBO Consultants, where attorney Leticia de la Hoz works. De la Hoz represented Garcia during his trial at Spain’s Supreme Court, where he was convicted alongside former Transport Minister Jose Luis Abalos. The documents reveal that the publisher covered the costs for legal advice, fees, and procedural expenses related to Garcia’s case, contradicting previous allegations that the Socialist Workers Party had funded the defense. The financial records consist of two invoices and corresponding bank transfers. The first invoice, dated November 27, 2025, listed a base amount of 150,000 euros plus value-added tax, totaling 181,500 euros. On that same day, OkDiario published an exclusive interview with Garcia, who was preparing to enter prison. In the interview, Garcia criticized Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and other political figures, alleging irregularities in primary elections involving immigrants. The second payment occurred on January 23, 2026, for 60,500 euros including tax. This brought the total expenditure by the media company to 242,000 euros. During the period spanning these payments, OkDiario served as an unofficial spokesperson for Garcia, publishing exclusive communications from inside the Soto del Real prison in Madrid. In one such exchange, Garcia stated that once released, all his accusers would fall one by one. Leticia de la Hoz introduced these documents into the judicial file known as Case Leire Diez, in which she faces charges. She is accused of allegedly forming part of a scheme linked to the Socialist Party aimed at destabilizing judicial proceedings affecting party leaders or their families. Specifically, prosecutors allege she offered money to businesswoman Carmen Pano in exchange for retracting a statement claiming she had carried 90,000 euros in cash bags to the party headquarters on Ferraz Street. By proving that a media outlet, rather than the political party, paid her fees, De la Hoz aims to clear her name. Her legal team filed a written submission stating that the documents prove the Socialist Party did not make any payment for the defense of Koldo Garcia Izaguirre. Judge Santiago Pedraz initially refused permission for De la Hoz to disclose the identity of her client during her testimony as a suspect. However, on Wednesday, the judge signed an order requesting the attorney to provide the engagement letter, invoice, or proof of payment to the court case. Following this authorization, the documentation was presented on Thursday. The revelation has sparked intense scrutiny regarding the relationship between the media outlet and the defendants in the so-called Mask Case. Garcia was sentenced by the Supreme Court to 19 years, eight months, and one day in prison for crimes including criminal organization, bribery, embezzlement, and influence peddling. His former boss, Abalos, received a harsher sentence of 24 years and three months for similar offenses. On the day the payment information became public, journalists from elDiario.es arranged a meeting with De la Hoz to obtain her account of the situation. The meeting was organized by deputy editor Jose Manuel Romero after learning about the OkDiario payments. It took place around 3:00 PM at a restaurant near the newspaper’s offices, described as a casual lunch rather than a clandestine encounter. Two reporters attended, one from the courts section. They left the establishment at 4:44 PM. As they walked back toward the newsroom, a large man wearing a suit and sporting a shaved head approached them. He showed them his mobile phone, which displayed the OkDiario logo, and told them he had been taking photos of them for Eduardo Inda, the director of OkDiario. The man then turned and walked back toward the restaurant. Shortly after the incident, at 4:58 PM, Inda sent a brief WhatsApp message to one of the reporters containing only the word "Jojo." De la Hoz reportedly suffered a similar encounter while speaking by phone with the journalists. She stated she intends to file a complaint against the incident, characterizing it as an attempt at intimidation. The newsroom is currently consulting with its lawyer regarding potential legal action. Meanwhile, OkDiario is expected to publish photographs of the meal in the coming hours. The outlet may seek to frame the routine journalistic interaction with a source as a conspiracy. Journalists emphasized that meeting with sources is standard professional practice, noting that they have previously met with high-profile figures in other investigations. They stressed that unlike some other entities, they do not pay sources for information. The tension highlights the growing friction between investigative journalism and media groups with political affiliations in ongoing corruption trials.
5 reports
PúblicoIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 95
The publisher of the Spanish tabloid Okdiario paid 242,000 euros to cover the legal defense costs of Koldo García, a former senior advisor to the Spanish government who is currently facing criminal charges. This financial arrangement has raised questions regarding potential conflicts of interest and the independence of the media outlet involved. The payment was made to support García’s legal team during his ongoing judicial proceedings. The revelation highlights the complex relationships between media figures and political actors under investigation in Spain.
Bias read (Center): The provided text consists solely of a headline stating a specific financial fact regarding a political figure's legal defense. There is no body text available to analyze for loaded language, selective sourcing, or editorial framing. Because the input lacks the narrative elements required to assess
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (95): The available text is purely declarative and contains no editorializing, opinion, or loaded language. It is completely neutral in tone, though limited in scope due to brevity.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 95
Leticia de la Hoz, the lawyer representing former ministerial advisor Koldo García, submitted two invoices to the judge presiding over the 'Leire' case at Spain’s National Court. The documents indicate that Dos Mil Palabras, the publisher of the online outlet OkDiario, paid 242,000 euros between November 2025 and January 2026. These payments were designated to cover legal fees, court costs, and expenses related to legal advice and proceedings for García, who was formerly a trusted aide to ex-minister José Luis Ábalos.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a specific financial disclosure regarding legal defense costs involving a high-profile political figure and a media entity. It relies entirely on documentary evidence (invoices) submitted to a judicial body without adding adjectives, speculation, or value judgments about the im
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (95): The language is formal and detached. There is no attempt to sway the reader emotionally; it simply states what was paid and by whom, maintaining high objectivity.
infoLibreIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
The publishing company behind the Spanish digital outlet OkDiario paid over 242,000 euros for the legal defense of Koldo Garcia, former advisor to ex-minister Jose Luis Abalos, according to documents reviewed by infoLibre. These payments were made to the law firm of attorney Leticia de la Hoz, who represents Garcia in the 'Leire case' proceedings. The financial records contradict claims by de la Hoz that the Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) covered these costs. Garcia was recently sentenced by Spain's Supreme Court to nearly 20 years in prison for crimes including bribery and criminal organization related to the 'Mascarillas case.' During his pre-trial period, OkDiario served as an unofficial spokesperson for Garcia, publishing exclusive interviews conducted while he was in custody.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the story around a conflict between a right-leaning digital outlet (OkDiario) and the ruling center-left PSOE. It highlights evidence that contradicts the lawyer's claims regarding PSOE funding, implying institutional corruption or deception within the governing party. The tone is
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): The tone is strictly journalistic and neutral. It presents the financial transactions and the legal defense strategy without injecting opinion or emotional language. The headline is direct and factual.
elDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
The digital media outlet Okdiario paid 242,000 euros in legal fees to the law firm representing former Spanish government advisor Koldo Garcia during his trials at the National Court and Supreme Court. These payments were made by Dos Mil Palabras S.L., the publisher of Okdiario, directly to the firm where attorney Leticia de la Hoz works. The invoices and bank transfers were submitted to Judge Santiago Pedraz by de la Hoz as evidence in her own investigation under the 'Leire Diez' case, which alleges a criminal network linked to the PSOE aimed at destabilizing judicial proceedings involving party leaders. By providing this documentation, de la Hoz seeks to refute accusations that the Socialist Party funded Garcia's defense, asserting that the payments came exclusively from the media company. The article notes that Okdiario published an interview with Garcia shortly after the first payment was made, in which he criticized Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and other high-ranking PSOE figures.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the revelation through a lens critical of the ruling PSOE, explicitly describing the paying entity, Okdiario, as a medium 'affiliated with the Spanish political right.' It highlights quotes from Okdiario's director supporting rival parties (PP and Vox) against the current Prime,nd
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): Maintains a neutral, informative stance. The writing style is standard news reporting, focusing on the documentary evidence and the legal implications without using sensationalist or biased adjectives.
elDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 40
A journalist at elDiario.es recounts being confronted by a man claiming to work for rival outlet OkDiario after meeting with lawyer Leticia de la Hoz. The meeting was arranged to discuss recent revelations that OkDiario’s parent company paid 242,000 euros for the legal defense of Koldo Garcia during his Supreme Court trial. De la Hoz disclosed these payments while under investigation by the National Court, clarifying that she had not been paid by the Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) as previously alleged, but rather by the media group led by Eduardo Inda. The confrontation occurred outside a restaurant where the journalists were having lunch, with the unidentified man showing them a phone displaying the OkDiario logo before leaving. The incident highlights tensions between competing media outlets covering high-profile political corruption cases involving former government officials.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as an act of intimidation against journalism by a right-wing tabloid (OkDiario), using terms like 'confronted' and describing the aggressor's physical appearance in a threatening manner. It emphasizes the legitimacy of the elDiario.es meeting ('not clandestine', 'no动机
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (40): The piece is written in the first person and adopts a defensive, personal tone ('I do not reveal my meetings...'). While it presents the facts, the framing centers on the reporter's professional integrity and the surprise of the situation, which introduces a subjective narrative layer compared to st
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Spain
%3Aformat(jpg)%3Aquality(99)%2Ff.elconfidencial.com%2Foriginal%2Fad3%2F550%2F569%2Fad3550569cde88cbeea21e582d529e20.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
