ON
← Back to feed
Denied appeal by influencer who at 160 miles an hour deliberately crashed into a wall and killed two boys
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter17 hr. ago

Denied appeal by influencer who at 160 miles an hour deliberately crashed into a wall and killed two boys

The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of convicted murderer Mackenzie Shirilla, who was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison for intentionally causing a traffic accident in 2022 that killed her boyfriend Dominic Russo and his friend Davion Flanagan. Shirilla, then 17, deliberately accelerated her Toyota Camry to 160 km/h before crashing into a brick wall, killing two teenagers. Her legal team had filed a request with the state’s highest court in July to reconsider her case, but the court ruled on August 23 that the appeal was submitted too late and that it lacked jurisdiction to justify the delay. Shirilla’s lawyers also argued that her trial violated her constitutional rights and that she did not receive adequate legal representation. The court’s decision marks the end of her desperate attempts to overturn her conviction.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentCenter17 hr. ago
Denied appeal by influencer who at 160 miles an hour deliberately crashed into a wall and killed two boys

The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of convicted murderer Mackenzie Shirilla, who was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison for intentionally causing a traffic accident in 2022 that killed her boyfriend Dominic Russo and his friend Davion Flanagan. Shirilla, then 17, deliberately accelerated her Toyota Camry to 160 km/h before crashing into a brick wall, killing two teenagers. Her legal team had filed a request with the state’s highest court in July to reconsider her case, but the court ruled on August 23 that the appeal was submitted too late and that it lacked jurisdiction to justify the delay. Shirilla’s lawyers also argued that her trial violated her constitutional rights and that she did not receive adequate legal representation. The court’s decision marks the end of her desperate attempts to overturn her conviction.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a judicial decision regarding a criminal case involving a minor. It presents the facts of the case, the legal proceedings, and the court's reasoning without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal process rather than taking a stance on the

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories