The recent statement issued by the Office of the Prosecutor (VJT) in Belgrade has sparked significant controversy and political discourse in Serbia. According to the declaration, the VJT has uncovered a meticulously planned scheme involving fabricated claims about the use of a "sonic cannon" during protests in March 2025. This alleged fabrication was intended to incite mass panic, street conflicts, and ultimately lead to civil war in Serbia. The claim centers around a protest held on March 15, 2025, which saw a large gathering in Belgrade's Slavija Square. During this event, a sudden noise occurred, described by witnesses as resembling the sound of an aircraft or a fast-moving vehicle approaching from the direction of Terazije towards Slavija. This incident led to widespread confusion and panic among attendees, with some later alleging that sonic weapons were used against them.
According to the VJT’s findings, the organizers of the protest had previously discussed plans to simulate the use of a sonic cannon during the demonstration. These discussions reportedly took place at a meeting attended by students involved in the blockade on January 22, 2025. At that meeting, it was mentioned that a "mass response from Brussels" would follow such an action, suggesting that foreign entities might have been involved in planning or supporting these activities. Additionally, references were made to practices observed in China, where individuals are said to move aside when they hear a sonic cannon.
The VJT has requested information from the Counter-Terrorism Unit (UKP) regarding documentation related to a plenary session of several faculties, where plans for simulating the use of a sonic cannon during the protest were allegedly outlined. Despite the VJT initiating an investigation into the matter, which requires collecting evidence, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) has already taken a firm stance, asserting that the false allegations about the use of a sonic cannon were part of a broader strategy aimed at destabilizing the country.
The MUP, under the leadership of Minister Ivica Dacic, has emphasized that the police acted professionally and restrainedly during the protest, maintaining public order and peace. Dacic criticized certain political circles and their media outlets for deliberately spreading disinformation about the alleged brutality of the police. He argued that these groups sought to ignite unrest in Serbia, expecting citizens and law enforcement personnel to bear the consequences.
Dacic further highlighted the alarming aspect of the investigation, noting that the planners anticipated a "mass response from Brussels," indicating potential external support or involvement. He warned that such actions directly threaten the security of the Republic of Serbia and must be severely sanctioned. The MUP has pledged full support to judicial authorities in continuing the investigation, ensuring that dangerous subversive activities threatening national security are addressed with the utmost rigor.
In contrast, legal expert Vladimir Djukanovic expressed skepticism about the VJT's claims, stating that he believed the situation was more likely a manipulation than a premeditated plot. He emphasized his respect for the presumption of innocence and urged the VJT to thoroughly investigate the matter before making accusations. Meanwhile, attorney Vladimir Beljanski raised concerns over the handling of the case involving military analyst Aleksandar Radic, whose home was searched and electronic devices confiscated without clear justification. He viewed the government's narrative surrounding the simulated use of a sonic cannon as an attempt to suppress dissent and instill fear among citizens who dare to challenge authority.
As the investigation unfolds, the implications of these developments remain uncertain. With both sides presenting compelling arguments and evidence, the situation continues to evolve, leaving many questions unanswered. What remains clear is that the issue has ignited intense debate within Serbian society, highlighting deep divisions between those who see the government's actions as necessary measures to maintain stability and those who view them as oppressive tactics designed to silence opposition. As the VJT proceeds with its inquiry, the world will be watching closely to see how this complex web of allegations and counter-allegations plays out.
5 reports
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 88Objective 6017 days agoIvica Dacic, Serbia's Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, accused the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade of revealing a 'monstrous' plan to incite mass panic, street conflicts, and civil war in Serbia through fabricated claims about the use of a sound cannon by police on Slavija Square. He stated that the false narrative was part of a premeditated strategy by certain political circles and their media to destabilize the country.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong accusation against unspecified political groups and media outlets for orchestrating a deliberate campaign to instigate unrest in Serbia. The language used ('monstrous plan,' 'cold-blooded scenario,' 'destabilize the country') reflects a clear ideological framing that指责s
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it reflects the cross-source consensus about the planned misinformation campaign. Objectivity is moderate as it presents political criticism but remains focused on the issue rather than personal attacks.
N1 SrbijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 87Objective 6213 days agoThe article discusses the legal actions taken by Serbian authorities against individuals, including military analyst Aleksandar Radić, in connection with an alleged simulation of a sound cannon during protests on March 15, 2026. According to attorney Vladimir Beljanski, these actions constitute a violation of human rights, as Radić's home was searched, his electronic devices were seized, and he was questioned despite no clear evidence of criminal activity. The prosecutor's office has announced plans to investigate four groups of people, including those who reported health effects after the protests. Beljanski argues that the authorities have resorted to this narrative because previous attempts to deny the existence or use of sound cannons have failed, and now they are trying to suppress dissent by accusing protesters of fabricating the incident.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of the authorities as repressive measures aimed at silencing dissent and creating fear among citizens. It emphasizes violations of human rights, suggests manipulation by the state, and portrays the situation as an attempt to suppress political opposition through false,
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 62): Factuality is high as it mirrors the consensus around the fabricated narrative and state response. Objectivity is slightly better as it includes legal perspectives and maintains a focus on procedural issues.
N1 SrbijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 86Objective 5817 days ago Dačić: VJT announcement exposed a monstrous plan, the lie about the sonic cannon was an introduction to the civil warIvica Dačić, Serbia's Minister of Internal Affairs, stated that the announcement by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade has fully exposed a 'monstrous and meticulously planned scheme' aimed at creating mass panic, street conflicts, and civil war in Serbia through fabricated claims about the use of a sound cannon by police on Slavija Square. He emphasized that the claim was not an error but a premeditated strategy.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents strong accusations against unnamed actors who are described as waging a 'hybrid war' against the state and the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The language used—such as 'monstruous plan,' 'cold-blooded scenario,' and 'without any shame or responsibility'—is highly charged and confi
Why these scores (Factual 86 · Objective 58): Factuality is high as it supports the cross-source claim of a coordinated misinformation effort. Objectivity is lower due to emotive language and strong political rhetoric, which leans toward a specific political stance.
RepublikaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 5517 days agoVladimir Đukanović, an attorney, commented on social media regarding fabricated claims about the alleged use of a sound cannon during protests in Belgrade on March 15. He stated that from the beginning it was clear this was a manipulation and expressed disbelief that such a serious lie could have been planned to potentially lead to a civil conflict. He emphasized his respect for the presumption of innocence and called for those responsible to be arrested and sentenced to long-term imprisonment if proven guilty.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents strong criticism of what is described as a deliberate fabrication aimed at inciting civil unrest, using emotionally charged language like 'monstrous act,' 'civil war,' and calling for long-term imprisonment for those involved. The framing emphasizes the gravity of the situation,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 55): Factuality is high as the article aligns with the cross-source consensus that the 'zvučni top' incident was a fabricated narrative leading to unrest. Objectivity is low due to strong emotional language, accusations of manipulation, and calls for punishment, which show bias.
RepublikaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 60Objective 3517 days ago "EVERY HUNTLE MONSTROUS PLAN, LIE ABOUT SOUND BULLETTING was inserted into a civil war!" Minister Dacic also responded and sent a clear messageMinistar unutrašnjih poslova Ivica Dačić je reagovao na saopštenje Višeg javnog tužilaštva koje je istraživalo incident oko 'zvučnog topa' na Slaviji. Prema Dačiću, tužilaštvo je pokazalo da je laž o upotrebi zvučnog topa bila planirana kako bi se izazvala panika, sukobi i građanski rat. Dačić je optužio političke krugove i medije za širenje dezinformacija i pokušaje da destabilizuju državu.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a strong critique of political actors and media outlets for spreading disinformation, using emotionally charged language such as 'monstruozan plan', 'brutalna laž', and 'scenario blokadera'. It frames the situation as an intentional attack on the state by unnamed groups, with no
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 35): This article repeats similar allegations from the first piece, emphasizing a conspiracy involving foreign interests and internal sabotage. It quotes officials but frames the situation as a deliberate attack on Serbia, showing clear political bias and lack of balanced reporting.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Serbia
