A new detail has emerged in the Split corruption case involving a police officer who allegedly provided confidential data to members of a split-based narcotics gang during his annual leave. The investigation was initiated based on a criminal report from the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PNUSKOK), targeting three suspects including the police officer. According to investigators, the officer, who is related to the accused, accessed police records in early February 2021 to check vehicle ownership information for three cars. This request reportedly originated from a 41-year-old man seeking to determine if police officers monitoring individuals linked to drug trafficking were using these vehicles and whether he and his associates were under police surveillance. The officer allegedly visited his workplace during his annual leave on March 5, 2021, conducted the check, and shared the data with the 44-year-old man, who then passed it to the 41-year-old. Both men have been placed under preventive detention, while the 41-year-old was already in custody. The investigation also led to the arrest of another individual, with preliminary findings suggesting the suspect had previously checked vehicle
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments in a corruption case involving law enforcement and organized crime, without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on legal procedures, investigative actions, and judicial outcomes without ideological framing. While the subject matter is highly讼
Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details such as dates (beginning of February 2021), names of individuals (44-year-old relative, 41-year-old individual), and actions taken by the police (investigation, arrests, measures imposed). These align with the general consensus from other sources covering the sa
Why objectivity (75): The article uses terms like 'narko-klan' (drug gang) and describes the police officer as having leaked information, which can imply guilt before proven. The tone leans slightly toward the prosecution’s perspective, but it remains mostly factual and avoids overtly biased language.





