Unofficially, Luka Mesec is joining the battle in Ljubljana

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 91Objective 866 days ago

The article reports on the upcoming local elections in Ljubljana, focusing on the political landscape and potential candidates. Current Mayor Zoran Janković has announced his candidacy, and his support includes Lenart Žavbi, the deputy leader of the Freedom Party. Meanwhile, former President of the National Assembly Urška Klakočar Zupančič and former Prime Minister Anton Rop are running together on a common list, though they have not yet revealed their candidate for mayor. Klakočar Zupančič stated that they will decide later who will represent them and emphasized the need for fresh ideas and changes in city governance. She highlighted priorities such as improving public transportation, environmental policies, and housing quality. The article also mentions Luka Mesec, a prominent opposition figure, as a potential challenger to Janković.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about multiple candidates and parties without overtly favoring any side. It provides balanced reporting by mentioning both the incumbent mayor’s supporters and the opposition figures, including those from different political backgrounds. While there is some emphasis,

Why these scores (Factual 91 · Objective 86): Very factual with precise reporting and minimal bias. Objectivity is high as it maintains neutrality in presenting information.

DomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 859 days ago

The article discusses the low mobilization rate for a referendum on a parliamentary inquiry law reform, which was initiated by left-wing advocates. Despite four years of political turmoil under Prime Minister Golob’s administration, public engagement remains weak. The campaign, led by left-wing figures including notable actors like Jurij Zrnec, uses provocative tactics such as fearmongering about potential surveillance of citizens' private data. The article criticizes these efforts as misleading and highlights the lack of genuine support for the referendum, suggesting that the campaign relies on exaggerated claims rather than substantive backing. It also references recent legislative changes aimed at improving the efficiency of parliamentary inquiries but notes ongoing skepticism about their implementation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the left-wing campaign as a legitimate effort against perceived overreach by authorities, while criticizing the opposition as using fearmongering and misinformation. It emphasizes the left's concerns about privacy and political control, portraying them as justified, while implying

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately describes the constitutional court’s decision regarding the RTV Slovenia law after three years. It remains mostly neutral in tone while providing background information, maintaining good factual accuracy and moderate objectivity.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 808 days ago

The article reports on a referendum initiative in Slovenia aimed at opposing 'political police' through parliamentary investigations. The campaign has collected over 40,000 signatures, which would allow the proposal to proceed. The initiators argue that the proposed law would enable parliamentary committees to access private communications, SMS messages, phone calls, bank accounts, and even those of individuals not involved in politics or criminal activity. They claim this would grant politicians unchecked power to investigate anyone at any time without prior judicial oversight. The signatories include former members of the Human Rights Committee and various NGOs, civil society groups, activists, and unions. Despite technical challenges and difficult conditions, including summer heat and administrative system failures, the signature collection was completed before the 35-day legal deadline. Supporters emphasize the importance of protecting fundamental rights against authoritarian tendencies in governance.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a defense of democratic values and human rights against potential authoritarianism. It emphasizes the risks of expanding parliamentary investigative powers without judicial oversight, portraying the proposed law as a threat to individual privacy and democratic checks.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): This article confirms the signature count and details the law’s potential effects. However, it leans toward the opposition by emphasizing the risks of the new law, using phrases like 'political police' and presenting the issue as a threat to democracy, which reduces neutrality.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 808 days ago

The article discusses the start of early voting for a referendum in Ljubljana regarding a parking regulation amendment. Six organizations, including political parties and individuals, are involved in organizing the campaign. The municipal administration has withdrawn the controversial regulation, but the referendum organizers persist, arguing that the mayor, Zoran Janković, avoided political responsibility by withdrawing the proposal. Critics claim the regulation was legally invalid and that the referendum remains valid. Legal experts have provided opinions supporting the withdrawal, while opponents argue the regulation would introduce paid parking and permits for residents. The referendum question asks whether voters support implementing specific provisions of the regulation. Over 227,000 eligible voters are registered, and the organizers need to meet a threshold for the referendum to succeed.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the referendum as a legitimate democratic process led by citizens against perceived mismanagement by the local government. It highlights criticism of Mayor Janković’s actions and emphasizes the civic initiative behind the referendum. While it presents both sides (municipal stance,

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article gives precise details about the early voting process and logistics of the referendum. It presents factual information neutrally without taking sides in the debate over the parking regulation changes.

Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 89Objective 828 days ago

The article reports on the start of early voting for a referendum on a parking regulation in Ljubljana, which is scheduled for Sunday. The initiative behind the referendum insists on holding the vote despite the city council unexpectedly withdrawing the regulation. Critics argue that the council used the potential revenue from paid parking to fill their treasury. Six organizations, including political parties and individuals, are involved in the campaign. Civil initiatives criticize the current leadership for poor governance, citing the parking regulation as a symbol of mismanagement. A campaign called 'Show the Mayor a Yellow Card' highlights past mistakes by the mayor. The mayor claims the referendum is unnecessary and suggests funds could be better spent on meaningful projects. Legal experts argue the regulation was not legally withdrawn and remains valid, making the referendum possible.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the referendum as a legitimate democratic process against perceived corruption and mismanagement by local authorities. It emphasizes the criticism of the mayor and the city council, portraying them as evading responsibility. The focus on civic initiatives and legal arguments for a

Why these scores (Factual 89 · Objective 82): The article provides comprehensive information about the referendum including logistical details and campaign efforts. It presents facts objectively while acknowledging both sides of the debate.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 788 days ago

The article reports on a referendum being held in Ljubljana regarding a parking regulation change. Citizens can vote from today until Thursday at the Marmorni dvorana venue of the Gospodarsko razstavišče, with free parking available for voters. The referendum question asks whether citizens support implementing a specific clause that introduces parking restrictions in certain areas. The voting period ends on Sunday, with results expected by 21:00. The law states that the regulation will be rejected if more than half of eligible voters oppose it and at least 45,476 votes are cast against it. The article provides logistical information about the referendum process but does not take a stance on the issue itself.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum process, including dates, locations, and procedural details. It does not express any ideological preference or opinion about the proposed parking regulations. The tone remains neutral, focusing on logistics rather than advocating for or反对

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 78): The article accurately describes the referendum process and provides practical information for voters. It maintains an objective tone while explaining the background of the issue.

MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 87Objective 768 days ago

The article discusses early voting ahead of a referendum in Ljubljana regarding a controversial parking regulation. The local government initially passed the regulation but later withdrew it, prompting organizers of the referendum to continue their campaign against it. Critics argue that the regulation was used to fill the city’s coffers and that the mayor attempted to avoid accountability by retracting the decision. Six groups, including political parties and civil initiatives, are supporting the referendum. The mayor, Zoran Janković, argues that the referendum is unnecessary since the regulation has been withdrawn. Legal experts debate whether the withdrawal was lawful, with some suggesting the regulation still stands. This would be the third municipal referendum since 2000 and the first initiated through a large citizen petition.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a democratic struggle against the mayor's actions, using terms like 'avoiding political responsibility' and highlighting opposition from leftist and civil society groups. It emphasizes the citizens’ initiative and criticizes the mayor’s handling of the situation, with

Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 76): The article accurately reports on the referendum process and includes relevant background information. It maintains a mostly neutral tone while highlighting the controversy surrounding the parking regulation changes.

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago

The article reports on a traffic incident on the Gorenjska motorway where a vehicle breakdown caused a complete closure at the Karavanke tunnel in both directions. The information was provided by the Motorway Information Center for State Roads. The article then shifts focus to a poll asking if two candidates, Urška Klakočar Zupančič and Anton Ropa, could defeat incumbent mayor Zoran Janković in local elections. The poll results show mixed opinions, with some respondents believing it's possible if Zupančič is the candidate, while others doubt Janković's defeat.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the election poll, showing differing opinions without overtly favoring any particular candidate or outcome. It does not frame the discussion in a clearly left or right-leaning manner, thus maintaining a center alignment.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article reports the closure of the Karavanke tunnel due to a vehicle breakdown, as confirmed by the traffic information center. It provides factual details without bias. However, it includes unrelated opinion polls about local elections, which detracts from objectivity.

DomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 806 days ago

The mayor of Ljubljana, Zoran Janković, has received another 'red card' from the civil initiative CILJ, which has submitted a request to the Constitutional Court to assess the legality of his decision to withdraw a local ordinance regarding parking regulations. Many city council members who oppose Janković's legal maneuvering have signed the petition. The initiative argues that this move demonstrates their commitment to preventing the erosion of the legal system and democratic processes, especially since Janković has expressed fear of facing citizens and listening to their voices. Legal experts from the Human Rights Protection Center (PIC) and the Network for Democracy Protection claim that the legal opinion obtained by the Municipal Office of Ljubljana (MOL) was paid for and allowed the municipality to withdraw decisions even after a referendum process had been initiated. They argue that such actions undermine direct democracy through referendums. The petition submitted to the Constitutional Court requests that the court revoke the decision and prevent similar arbitrary actions in future local referendums. This challenge raises questions about the legal implications of referendums

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a conflict between the mayor and civil society over the integrity of democratic processes, emphasizing the opposition to the mayor's actions and highlighting concerns about legal manipulation. It presents the civil initiative's perspective as legitimate and critic

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides factual information about upcoming local elections and the current political landscape. It remains neutral in tone, presenting facts without overt bias or emotional language.

Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 808 days ago

An article reports that enough signatures have been collected to trigger a referendum on a parliamentary inquiry law reform. The initiative, led by proponents of the new coalition, states that over 40,000 signatures were gathered, meeting the threshold required to hold a constitutional referendum. The proposed law would allow parliamentary inquiry commissions to access private communications, SMS messages, phone calls, and bank accounts of individuals, including those not involved in politics or suspected of criminal activity. The supporters argue that this reform would grant politicians unchecked power to intrude into personal lives and private spheres, while also claiming that existing safeguards prevent such abuse of authority.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed parliamentary inquiry reforms as granting 'unchecked power' to politicians, implying potential misuse of authority. It emphasizes the risks of 'unlimited powers' being given to the political class, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of executive overreach. The措

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports the collection of signatures for a referendum, stating 42,004 collected, which meets the threshold of 40,000. It provides details on the proposed law and its implications, aligning with cross-source consensus. The tone remains neutral but slightly emotive when discussi

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago

A group has collected 42,004 signatures to initiate a referendum against a proposed law expanding parliamentary investigations. The referendum, titled 'against political police,' aims to prevent politicians from bypassing judicial oversight to launch investigations at will. The proposal would allow investigative committees to access private communications, SMS messages, phone calls, bank accounts, and personal data of individuals unrelated to politics, including their family members and friends. Supporters argue this law could grant unchecked power to authorities to intrude into citizens' private lives, while opponents claim it protects against abuse of power. The initiative was backed by NGOs, civil society groups, activists, and unions, despite challenges like technical issues and summer heat. The referendum is expected to take place in the fall.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate without overtly favoring one perspective. It outlines the concerns raised by supporters regarding potential abuse of power and the risks to privacy, but does not explicitly criticize or endorse either side. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Consistent with other sources, reporting the same number of signatures and the intent behind the referendum. Maintains a neutral tone, though uses phrases like 'proti politični policiji' which may carry some emotional weight.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday

The article discusses the outcome of a referendum held in Ljubljana on a parking regulation, which failed to meet the required rejection threshold due to low voter turnout. Mayor Zoran Janković expressed gratitude to both those who participated and those who did not. He emphasized that the law sets a rejection quota that was not met, thus ending the matter. The article notes that a representative of the Civic Initiative for Ljubljana (CILJ), Borut Hočevar, called for the municipality to re-introduce the revised parking ordinance, stating it was his personal opinion. The mayor criticized this call, suggesting it could be interpreted as a misuse of the referendum result. Janković also claimed the referendum was effectively against him, noting that many voters were unaware of what they were voting on and that support came from various initiatives opposed to his leadership.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving local governance and public policy, the framing remains balanced. It presents both the mayor’s stance and the opposition’s arguments without overtly favoring either side. The tone is objective, focusing on the procedural outcome and各方的

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports on the mayor's response to the referendum outcome and his stance on the parking regulation. However, it presents the mayor's perspective without sufficient counterpoints from opponents, showing some bias despite being mostly factually correct.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758 days ago

The article reports on a debate regarding a proposed referendum in Ljubljana concerning parking regulations. Jasmin Feratović, president of the Pirate Party and a city council advisor, criticizes the local authorities for allegedly acting arrogantly by moving the parking regulation proposal to a different date after a referendum petition was submitted. He argues this action undermines democratic processes and denies citizens their right to vote on an issue they have supported through signatures. Feratović emphasizes the importance of the referendum as a means for residents to reclaim control over local decisions and highlights concerns about the municipality's alleged manipulation of legal procedures to maintain power. The Pirate Party and the civic initiative CILJ call for public participation in the referendum, asserting that sufficient support exists among residents. They also mention ongoing legal disputes over land ownership and accuse the municipality of using these issues to generate revenue at the expense of citizens.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the referendum as a struggle between citizen rights and municipal authority, emphasizing the legitimacy of public opinion and criticizing the local government's actions as arrogant and legally dubious. The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article provides accurate information about the referendum process and includes quotes from opposition figures. It maintains a relatively balanced tone while focusing on the political aspects of the situation.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758 days ago

The article reports on the start of early voting for a referendum on parking regulations in the city of Ljubljana. Early voting takes place at the Economic Fairgrounds from today until Thursday between 7 and 19 hours. Voters participating in early voting are offered free parking at the site, accessible via Linhartova or Vilharjeva streets. Upon exiting the polling station, voters must confirm their parking ticket with staff to ensure free exit from the parking area. The referendum question asks whether citizens support the implementation of Article 4 of the regulation on amendments and additions to the Regulation on Traffic Organization in the City Municipality of Ljubljana, which introduces parking management in areas of residential zones (sections 15a, 15b, and 15c). The Civic Initiative for Ljubljana has called on residents to participate in the Sunday referendum or early voting, urging them to vote against the proposal.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum process, including dates, locations, and procedures, without overtly endorsing or opposing the proposed parking regulations. It provides balanced reporting by mentioning both the availability of free parking and the civic initiative’s呼吁 (

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article provides accurate information about the referendum and its context. It includes quotes from various stakeholders but leans slightly towards the opposition viewpoint in its presentation.

Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 705 days ago

Ahead of a referendum on parking regulations in Ljubljana, Klemen Fajs of the Civic Initiative for Ljubljana criticized the lack of media attention on the campaign. He argued that the referendum has evolved beyond just deciding on parking rules in residential areas, raising broader questions about how the city is governed. Fajs accused Mayor Zoran Janković of downplaying the significance of the referendum and avoiding public debate by stepping back from the decision. He emphasized that voting against the decision would challenge both new parking restrictions and the current governance model of the city. Fajs also criticized the municipality for lacking willingness to engage in dialogue and compromise, particularly regarding proposed changes in Štepanjsko neighborhood. He claimed the local authorities avoided addressing residents' concerns directly.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the referendum as a broader issue of municipal governance rather than just parking regulation, suggesting a critique of centralized power. The tone emphasizes citizen participation and challenges the mayor’s approach, aligning with progressive values such as transparency and civic

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately summarizes the referendum issue and the opposition's criticisms of the mayor. It maintains a neutral tone overall but emphasizes the opposition's arguments more than the mayor's responses, slightly affecting objectivity.

Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 708 days ago

In Ljubljani je začelo tridnevno predčasno glasovanje pred nedeljskim referendumom o spremenjenem parkirnem odloku. Referendum se nanaša na uvedbo plačljivega parkiranja in sistema dovolilnic za stanovalce. Pobudniki referenduma menijo, da gre za širše vprašanje o vedenju občine in upoštevanju glasa meščanov, ne le za parkiranje. Mestni svet je odlok medtem uradno umaknil, kar zavrača župan Zoran Janković, ker odlok ne velja. Pravni strokovnjaki pa menijo, da je umik odloka zakonsko nezakoreninjen, zato referendum lahko poteka. Civilni aktivisti in politički stranki kot Piratska stranka kritizirajo manevre mestne oblasti kot poskus utišanja volivcev.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel podpira pozicijo pobudnikov referenduma, ki menijo, da gre za vprašanje demokracije in upoštevanja glasa meščanov, ne le za parkiranje. Uporablja besede kot 'dodatno polnjenje mestnega proračuna na račun občanov' in 'poskus izigravanja neposredne demokracije', kar kaže na levi orientaciji. M

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the start of early voting on the parking ordinance referendum in Ljubljana, including details about the opposition's stance and legal arguments. It presents both sides of the debate but shows some bias towards the referendum supporters, using emotionally charged langua

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 756 days ago

The article discusses the upcoming autumn local elections in Slovenia, scheduled for November 15th, which will take place in all 212 municipalities. These elections will involve voting for members of municipal councils and mayors for the next four-year term. The article notes uncertainty regarding whether citizens of third countries will be eligible to vote, referencing recent legal changes and ongoing efforts to collect signatures for a referendum. In Ljubljana, over 20,000 foreign nationals are registered in the electoral roll, but only around 1,500 voted in the 2022 elections. Current mayor Zoran Janković won decisively in 2022, but there are indications that this year’s election could see different results. Several potential candidates have announced their intentions to run, including representatives from various parties and independent groups. Additionally, former President of the National Assembly Urška Klakočar Zupančič and former Prime Minister Anton Rop are reportedly planning joint political activities ahead of the elections.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the upcoming elections, mentioning multiple political figures and parties without overtly favoring any side. It includes information on both current and potential candidates, as well as legal developments and voter eligibility issues, presenting the facts,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): The article gives factual details about the political candidate and their intentions but lacks depth in discussing the broader implications of the election. The tone is generally neutral but could provide more balanced perspectives.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 756 days ago

Urška Klakočar Zupančič, kandidatka na lokalnih volitvah v Ljubljani, je v oddaji 24UR ZVEČER povedala, da se je odločila za kandidaturjo zaradi želje, da Ljubljano modernizira in jo vrnite v roke ljudi, ki tam živijo in delajo. Poudarila je, da ne želi govoriti o funkcijah in imenih, temveč o programu in ciljih, ter pomeni, da bi moral mestni organ biti usmerjen v interes ljudi, ne obratno. Klakočar Zupančič je tudi kritizirala umik občine pred referendumom o parkirnem odloku, kar je smatrала za nepravilno in pravno sporno, kar bi naj prepričalo ljudi, da imajo pravico do sodelovanja pri upravljanju javnih zadev.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the political action of forming a joint list as a positive step toward modernization and citizen engagement, emphasizing the need for change and critique of current governance structures. The language suggests a progressive stance by highlighting the importance of civic input and,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports on the referendum petition and its implications. While it presents the facts clearly, it focuses more on the opposition's concerns, slightly affecting the balance of the narrative.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 70yesterday

The article discusses the situation around a canceled parking regulation decision in Ljubljana, Slovenia, and the subsequent referendum organized by citizens dissatisfied with local governance. According to Janković, the decision was withdrawn and will not be reintroduced during the current term. He emphasized that the majority of those who participated in the referendum, whether voting for or against, expressed their will. Janković believes most organizers of the referendum did not understand its purpose. The article mentions that the initiative was likely aimed at preparing for upcoming local elections and possibly targeting the mayor. The city council has stated they want to work within the community quarters and that the proposed decision was more just than the existing one. Local deputy mayor Dejan Crnek explained that the new parking regime was not legally valid because it had not been published in the official gazette and was temporarily blocked by the district court. The city plans to continue managing traffic according to announced measures.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both the city administration and the referendum organizers, providing perspectives from different sides without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes quotes from various stakeholders, including officials and representatives of the civil initiative, and

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article provides accurate information about the referendum and the mayor's position but leans toward the opposition's viewpoint, particularly in describing the campaign as being underreported by media. It remains largely factual but has a slight bias.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 70yesterday

Ljubljanski župan Zoran Janković je dejal, da je zgodba z občinskim referendumom o parkirnem režimu v Štepanjskem naselju končana, ker je kvorum ni bilo doseženo. Referendum, ki ga je organizirala Civilna iniciativa za Ljubljano, je imel 19 % udeležencev, medtem ko je 81 % občanov ne udeležilo. Janković meni, da je referendum bil nepopoln in da 99 % organizatorjev ne zna, o čem je referendum. Predstavnik Civilne iniciative Klemen Fajs je ocenil, da je referendum bil namenjen pripravam na lokalne volitve in da je bil proti županu. Ljubljanska občina je odločitev o parkirnem režimu umaknila, kar je Janković opisal kot bolj pravično. Podžupan Dejan Crnek je dejal, da je občina pristopila k reševanju problema na željo občanov in da je odločitev ne bila nastrojena proti stanovalcem, ampak obratno. Okrajno sodišče je zadržalo izvajanje novih pravil, kar je omogočilo občini, da je odločitev umaknila.

Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja različne perspektive glede referenduma in njegovega vpliva na občino. Janković kritizira referendum kot nepopoln in nezadovoljiv, medtem ko Fajs trdi, da je bil namenjen pripravam na volitve. Občina je odločitev umaknila, kar je poudaril Janković kot bolj pravično. Sodni proces,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports on the Ljubljana parking referendum but frames it from the perspective of the mayor rather than presenting multiple viewpoints. It mentions the withdrawal of the decree but lacks detailed context about the specific traffic regulation changes discussed in the source.