ON
← Back to feed
New rules: anyone who fights and wins the Eurosong will not be able to host.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

New rules: anyone who fights and wins the Eurosong will not be able to host.

Nakon što su neke zemlje, uključujući Španjolsku, Nizozemsku, Irsku i Sloveniju, izrazile prijetnju povlačenja s Eurosonga 2026. u Beču ako Izrael nije isključen zbog rata u Gazi, Europska radiodifuzijska unija (EBU) je prihvatila promjene u pravilima. Promjene su provedene na temelju povratnih informacija televizijskih kuća koje sudjelovale na natjecanju, s ciljem povećanja jasnoće za izvođače i producente. Direktor Eurosonga Martin Green objasnio je da su promjene dio kontinuiranog razvoja natjecanja, s ciljem očuvanja pravednosti, transparentnosti i dosljednosti. Eurosong 2027. održat će se u Bugarskoj nakon što je pjevačica Dara pobijedila na Eurosongu 2026.

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which oversees the Eurovision Song Contest, has announced sweeping changes to its rules for the 2027 competition. The new regulations state that the television broadcaster of the winning country will automatically lose the right to host the following year’s contest if their nation is involved in an armed conflict or a sensitive geopolitical situation. This decision comes amid growing tensions over the inclusion, or exclusion, of Israel in the upcoming 2026 contest in Vienna, Austria. The rule change was revealed ahead of the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest, which is set to take place in Vienna. Several countries, including Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Slovenia, had threatened to withdraw from this year’s event unless Israel was excluded due to the ongoing conflict in Gaza. These nations did not participate in the current edition of the contest, signaling their dissatisfaction with the EBU's handling of the issue. The EBU stated that the revised rules were implemented after receiving feedback from participating broadcasters, aiming to provide greater clarity for performers and production teams. Martin Green, director of Eurovision, emphasized that the contest continues to evolve and that annual review of the rules is essential to ensure fairness, transparency, and consistency for all participants. He noted that the changes for 2027 aim to clarify certain areas, protect performers, and guarantee a safe and encouraging environment for everyone involved while preserving the spirit and integrity that make Eurovision unique. According to Green, these adjustments reflect the union’s commitment to adapting to the changing global landscape while maintaining the contest’s core values. The decision to exclude the winner’s country from hosting the subsequent contest if they are embroiled in a conflict or sensitive geopolitical situation marks a historic shift in Eurovision’s long-standing traditions. Previously, the winning nation automatically secured the right to host the following year’s event, a practice that dates back to the contest’s inception in 1956. Under the new policy, this automatic qualification is contingent upon the political stability of the winning country. If the nation is involved in an active war or a politically charged situation, the hosting rights will be reassigned to another member of the EBU. This move follows years of debate around the role of politics in the contest. While Eurovision has always been a platform for cultural exchange and artistic expression, it has increasingly become a stage for geopolitical tensions. In recent years, several countries have raised concerns about the inclusion of Israel, particularly during times of heightened conflict. The 2026 contest in Vienna saw a notable absence of some European nations, highlighting the deepening divide over how the EBU should handle such issues. The 2027 contest will be held in Bulgaria, following the victory of singer Dara at the 2026 event in Vienna. This marks the first time Bulgaria will host the competition, adding a new dimension to the evolving dynamics of the contest. The selection of Bulgaria as the host underscores the EBU’s effort to balance regional representation with the new rule changes, ensuring that the contest remains inclusive and globally relevant. The new rules have sparked mixed reactions among participants and observers. Some view them as necessary steps to address the increasing politicization of the event, while others argue that they could complicate the already complex logistics of organizing the contest. The EBU has yet to detail exactly how the hosting rights will be determined under the new framework, leaving room for further clarification in the coming months. As the countdown to the 2027 contest begins, the impact of these changes on future participation and international relations remains to be seen.

2 reports

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 8811 days ago
New rules: anyone who fights and wins the Eurosong will not be able to host.

Nakon što su neke zemlje, uključujući Španjolsku, Nizozemsku, Irsku i Sloveniju, izrazile prijetnju povlačenja s Eurosonga 2026. u Beču ako Izrael nije isključen zbog rata u Gazi, Europska radiodifuzijska unija (EBU) je prihvatila promjene u pravilima. Promjene su provedene na temelju povratnih informacija televizijskih kuća koje sudjelovale na natjecanju, s ciljem povećanja jasnoće za izvođače i producente. Direktor Eurosonga Martin Green objasnio je da su promjene dio kontinuiranog razvoja natjecanja, s ciljem očuvanja pravednosti, transparentnosti i dosljednosti. Eurosong 2027. održat će se u Bugarskoj nakon što je pjevačica Dara pobijedila na Eurosongu 2026.

Bias read (Center): Članak opisuje političku situaciju oko Eurosonga, ali ne predstavlja jednu stranu kao više vrijednu ili kritičku. Povratne informacije televizijskih kuća su citirane kao osnova za promjene, što pokazuje neutralnost u izvorima. Uređivač ne koristi lošo izraze ni prema jednoj strani ni drugoj, već nav

Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports the changes to Eurovision rules regarding host country eligibility based on geopolitical conflicts, citing EBU and Martin Green’s statements. It also correctly states that Israel’s involvement in the Gaza war has led to threats of withdrawal from several countries. The

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the information neutrally, quoting officials and providing background on the controversy surrounding Israel’s participation. However, the title slightly emphasizes the 'historical change' aspect, which may imply significance beyond what is explicitly stated in the content.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8511 days ago
Eurosong is introducing a historic rule change that many won't like.

Eurosong objavio je novi propis koji zabranjuje automatsko pravljenje domaćina za zemlju koja je u 'oružanom sukobu' ili 'osjetljivoj geopolitičkoj situaciji'. Ovo je rezultat povratnih informacija od strane sudjelujućih televizijskih kuća. Promjene su napravljene kako bi se osigurala jasnoća za izvođače i produkcije, kao i zaštita izvođača i osiguranje sigurnog okruženja. Direktor Eurosonga Martin Green naglasio je potrebu za očuvanjem duha i integriteta natjecanja. Eurosong 2027. održat će se u Bugarskoj nakon što je pobjednica Dara osvojila naslov u Beču.

Bias read (Center): Artikl opisuje promjene u pravilima Eurosonga koje su rezultat političkog pritiska i geopolitičke situacije, ali ne predstavlja jednostanje ni jedne strane. Učestvujúce države kao što su Španjolska, Nizozemska, Irska i Slovenija izrazile su svoje stajalište, dok EBU objasnjava promjene kao potrebnu.

Why factuality (92): This article provides accurate reporting on the rule changes, including the automatic exclusion of the winning country if involved in an armed conflict or sensitive geopolitical situation. It correctly references the threat of withdrawal by several countries over Israel’s participation. The quotes f

Why objectivity (85): While the article includes direct quotes and avoids overt bias, the headline uses emotionally charged language like 'mnogima se neće svidjeti' ('many will not like it'), which introduces a slight subjective tone. This could influence reader perception even though the body remains largely neutral.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories