ON
← Back to feed
"Don't ever use my music again. Your truth is false". Ariana Grande's anger at Trump
Italy🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

"Don't ever use my music again. Your truth is false". Ariana Grande's anger at Trump

Ariana Grande expressed strong disapproval after her song 'We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love)' was used in a political TikTok video by Donald Trump's campaign. The video featured Trump on stage with text overlay that altered lyrics from her song to make a controversial statement about men not being able to have children and not competing in women's sports. Grande responded directly in the comments, telling Trump's team not to use her music again. Her message was later removed, but screenshots of her response circulated widely online. The video included hashtags supporting Trump and the MAGA movement.

Ariana Grande has publicly condemned Donald Trump's campaign team for using her music in a political advertisement, calling their actions misleading and inappropriate. The incident occurred on August 20, when the official "Team Trump" TikTok account posted a campaign video featuring her song "We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love)" as its soundtrack. Grande responded directly in the comments section, telling the account to "never use my music again," according to reports. Her message was later removed or hidden, though screenshots of her response have since circulated widely online. The video shows Trump taking the stage during a rally. It initially overlays a lyric from Grande’s song, “Me and my truth we sit in silence”, before shifting to a politically charged statement: “Men can’t have children and shouldn’t compete in women’s sports.” This message was accompanied by a caption stating, “This should not be controversial,” along with hashtags supporting Trump, the MAGA movement, and even Ariana Grande herself. Grande’s reaction came swiftly after the video was posted. She used the platform’s comment section to address the campaign directly, expressing her disapproval of how her music was being repurposed. While the specific text she wrote has been taken down, multiple users have shared images of her comment, which reportedly included the line, “Your truth is false.” These screenshots have continued to spread across social media platforms, drawing attention to the controversy. The use of Grande’s song in the video appears to have been intended to create a connection between her lyrics and the political messaging being promoted. However, Grande took issue with this approach, suggesting that the campaign had manipulated her work to align with their narrative. The lyrics in question were originally part of a song about personal reflection and emotional distance, far removed from the contentious political statements they were paired with. The campaign’s decision to use Grande’s music sparked immediate backlash. Some users criticized the move as an attempt to co-opt a popular artist’s work for political gain, while others questioned whether the campaign had obtained proper authorization to use the track. There has been no public confirmation from either Trump’s team or Grande’s representatives regarding whether permission was granted for the use of the song. The incident highlights the growing trend of political campaigns leveraging pop culture to craft messages that resonate with broader audiences. However, it also underscores the sensitivity surrounding such collaborations, particularly when artists feel their work is being misinterpreted or misrepresented. Grande’s response reflects a clear stance against the use of her music in contexts she does not endorse. The video itself was quickly met with mixed reactions. Some supporters of Trump praised the creative use of the song, while critics argued that it was an inconsiderate and potentially illegal use of intellectual property. Legal experts have noted that unauthorized use of copyrighted material in political ads could lead to legal challenges, though no formal action has been announced yet. As of now, there is no indication that the "Team Trump" account has addressed Grande’s concerns or removed the video. Meanwhile, Grande’s fans have continued to share her original comment, amplifying the call for the campaign to refrain from using her music in future content. The situation remains under observation, with many waiting to see if further developments will emerge from either side.

1 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
"Don't ever use my music again. Your truth is false". Ariana Grande's anger at Trump

Ariana Grande expressed strong disapproval after her song 'We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love)' was used in a political TikTok video by Donald Trump's campaign. The video featured Trump on stage with text overlay that altered lyrics from her song to make a controversial statement about men not being able to have children and not competing in women's sports. Grande responded directly in the comments, telling Trump's team not to use her music again. Her message was later removed, but screenshots of her response circulated widely online. The video included hashtags supporting Trump and the MAGA movement.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Ariana Grande's reaction against the use of her music in a politically charged manner, highlighting the alteration of her lyrics to promote a controversial political message. The tone emphasizes the misuse of her work for political propaganda, aligning with a critical perspective.

Why factuality (85): The article reports a known incident where Ariana Grande expressed displeasure over her song being used in a political campaign by Trump's team. It cites the specific song title, the platform (TikTok), and the nature of the response. While it does not provide direct quotes from primary sources like

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the event in a straightforward manner but carries a slight bias by emphasizing the conflict between Ariana Grande and Trump's campaign. The tone leans toward portraying Trump's actions as politically motivated, while the impact on Grande is framed more emotionally. This suggests

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories