HDZ president Dragan Čović stated he has been working for months to ease tensions with the SDA party, according to an interview with RTVHB. The statement prompted reactions from other parties including Narod i pravda.
In recent weeks, political tensions have flared in Bosnia and Herzegovina as statements made by Dragoljub Čović, leader of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), sparked controversy and debate among other major political entities. The situation has intensified following Čović’s public comments about relaxing relations between Croats and Bosniaks, which he claimed were being actively pursued through ongoing negotiations with the Party of Democratic Action (SDA). This revelation has drawn sharp responses from the opposition party "Narod i pravda" (NiP), which has long accused HDZ of pursuing secretive agendas aimed at advancing its own political interests rather than fostering genuine reconciliation.
According to NiP, Čović's remarks did not introduce new information but instead confirmed suspicions that HDZ and SDA have been engaged in extensive political discussions over several months. These talks, however, remain shrouded in secrecy, with their content and objectives kept hidden from the public. NiP argues that the term "relaxation of relations" does not imply a commitment to implementing rulings from the European Court of Human Rights or addressing discrimination, but rather reflects HDZ's long-term goals centered around concepts such as "legitimate representation," the creation of new electoral units, and further ethnic territorialization within Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The party also criticized the lack of transparency surrounding these negotiations. It pointed out that while Čović openly discusses the alleged relaxation of relations, Bakir Izetbegović, the president of the SDA, remains silent on the matter. NiP raised questions about whether Izetbegović is negotiating behind closed doors on behalf of the Democratic Front, and whether Željko Komšić, another prominent figure in the SDA, is aware of these secret discussions and supports them. This silence, according to NiP, suggests that the so-called relaxation of relations might mean new political concessions by Izetbegović to Čović in exchange for the return of the SDA to power.
Meanwhile, the SDA responded to the accusations by dismissing them as cheap tricks meant to divert attention from the failures of the ruling coalition. They emphasized that the SDA has historically been on the side of HDZ and that the claim that they are building a divided state together with HDZ would place them in the realm of political hypocrisy. The SDA highlighted past actions where the Tripartite Alliance (comprising SDP, NiP, and NS) had allegedly relaxed relations with HDZ, leading to HDZ gaining control over the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and enabling HDZ and SNSD to dominate the state level.
The SDA also listed a series of political moves attributed to the Tripartite Alliance, including agreeing to suspend the Constitution, allowing HDZ to take over numerous key positions in the Federation and the state, and making various concessions such as appointing HDZ candidates to important roles and granting HDZ control over certain administrative functions. The SDA accused the Tripartite Alliance of trying to shift blame onto others for their own failures and warned that such cheap tricks would not work, regardless of how hard they tried to manipulate public perception.
Haris Zahiragić, vice-president of the SDA, added his voice to the criticism, accusing NiP of having previously supported HDZ in critical moments, such as when HDZ gained control of Mostar through strategic alliances. He noted that after the 2022 elections, NiP joined forces with HDZ and SNSD, effectively selling off strategic positions. Zahiragić also took issue with the mention of his ironic comment about "megacantons," arguing that it was a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the SDA's stance on historical issues and future prospects.
Dragan Čović, responding to the criticisms, reiterated that the European path for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stalled and that efforts must be made to stabilize relations between Croats and Bosniaks. He emphasized the need for dialogue with the SDA, stating that the HDZ has been working intensively on this for several months. Čović acknowledged the challenges faced but expressed confidence that progress can be achieved despite the obstacles. He outlined clear ambitions for the upcoming elections, aiming for swift implementation of governance structures that ensure proper representation of the Croat community.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, all parties seem poised for further developments. The coming months will likely see increased scrutiny of the nature and outcomes of the alleged negotiations between HDZ and SDA, as well as continued debates over the direction of Bosnia and Herzegovina's political future. With both sides maintaining their respective positions, the resolution of these tensions remains uncertain, leaving the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina to watch closely as the unfolding drama unfolds.
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Become a SupporterThe same event as reported in other countries.
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Become a SupporterKey factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Become a SupporterHDZ president Dragan Čović stated he has been working for months to ease tensions with the SDA party, according to an interview with RTVHB. The statement prompted reactions from other parties including Narod i pravda.
Bias read (Left): The headline employs loaded framing, asking suggestive questions about backroom promises and evasiveness rather than reporting statements neutrally, implying impropriety without evidence.
The Stranka Demokratske Akcije (SDA) has responded to claims by 'Naša stranka' that they are working with the HDZ to create an ethnically divided state. The SDA criticized 'Naša stranka' for years of service to the HDZ and accused them of trying to avoid responsibility for the country's current crisis while pretending to be opposition. They also dismissed the claim as political hypocrisy.
Bias read (Left): The article frames 'Naša stranka' as politically hypocritical and accuses them of avoiding responsibility, using strong negative language such as 'političko licemjerje' (political hypocrisy), 'katastrofalnih rezultata' (catastrophic results), and 'devastirani ugled' (devastated reputation). The SDA,
The article discusses comments made by Dragutin Čović, leader of the HDZ BiH, regarding ongoing political negotiations with the SDA. The party 'Narod i pravda' criticizes these remarks, stating they confirm what they have warned about for months—that secret talks between HDZ BiH and SDA continue without public transparency. The article claims that Čović's reference to 'relaxing relations' does not imply compliance with European Court of Human Rights rulings or reducing discrimination but rather refers to HDZ BiH's long-term goals involving territorialization and electoral reforms. 'Narod i prv
Bias read (Left): The article frames HDZ BiH's actions as politically motivated and ethically questionable, emphasizing their alleged pursuit of self-interest over national interests. It uses critical language toward HDZ BiH's goals and presents 'Narod i pravda' as the ethical counterpoint.
SDA has responded to claims by 'Our Party' regarding relaxed relations between HDZ and SDA, suggesting these efforts aim at creating a divided state. SDA criticizes 'Our Party' for attempting to distance itself from the disastrous results of its three-year rule, which led to the worst crisis since Dayton. They accuse 'Our Party' of disrespecting citizens' intelligence by pretending to be opposition while continuing to hold power at both federal and state levels.
Bias read (Center): The article presents responses from both SDA and 'Our Party,' providing their respective arguments without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both parties, indicating balanced coverage of their positions.
SDA has responded to statements made by 'Naša stranka,' accusing them of disrespecting citizens' intelligence by pretending to be opposition when they are actually part of the ruling coalition. The SDA claims that 'Naša stranka' and their leader Sabina Ćudić have been trying to distance themselves from the catastrophic results of a three-year joint governance with other parties, which led to Bosnia and Herzegovina's worst post-war crisis. The SDA also criticizes 'Naša stranka' for misleading the public, such as falsely claiming that the cantonal prime minister Uk had resigned to avoid taking责任
Bias read (Left): The article uses strong language to criticize 'Naša stranka' for what it describes as disrespectful behavior toward citizens' intelligence and for failing to act as genuine opposition. It frames 'Naša stranka' as complicit in the current political crisis and accuses them of misleading the public, a措
Haris Zahiragić, vice-president of the SDA party, responded to a statement by 'Naša stranka' regarding the relaxation of relations between Bosniaks and Croats. He criticized 'Naša stranka' for having no moral authority to lecture the SDA on relations with the HDZ, citing their past actions during the 2021 Mostar mayoral election where they supported Mario Kordić, leading to an unfavorable position for Bosniaks in Mostar. Zahiragić also mentioned that 'Naša stranka' formed a coalition with the HDZ after the 2022 elections.
Bias read (Left): The article presents Zahiragić’s response to 'Naša stranka,' which is framed as a critique of their alignment with the HDZ. The language used emphasizes the negative consequences of this alignment for Bosniaks, suggesting a critical stance toward 'Naša stranka's policies and alliances. This framing,
Dragan Čović, leader of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and the Croatian People's Party (HNS) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), discussed the current political situation, changes to the Electoral Law, and BiH's European path following the first day of the European People's Party (EPP) summit in Sarajevo. He acknowledged that BiH's European progress has stalled and announced plans to intensify dialogue with Bosniak parties. Čović criticized the current structure of the BiH Presidency, noting that Bosniaks, being the largest ethnic group, have two representatives while Croats have none, which
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a political statement without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It presents Čović's views directly without editorializing or emphasizing one side over another.
Dragan Čović, president of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and the Croatian People's Party (HNS) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), announced plans to intensify talks with Bosniak parties following the European People's Party (EPP) summit in Sarajevo. He emphasized that Croats have had no representation in the Presidency of BiH for nearly 16 years, which he claims has hindered progress in the country. Čović criticized the current arrangement where Bosniaks, being the numerically larger group, hold two of the three seats in the Presidency, arguing this has negatively impacted Bosnia and Herzև
Bias read (Right): The article frames the lack of Croat representation in the BiH Presidency as a major obstacle to progress, using strong language like 'unazadili sve procese' (set back all processes). It emphasizes the need for Croats to gain more influence, suggesting a nationalist perspective aligned with HDZ's立场.
Covic, leader of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), stated in an interview with RTVHB that he has been working intensively with the Party of Democratic Action (SDA) for months to relax relations with Bosniaks, calling this the correct path forward. He acknowledged that the European integration process is stalled and emphasized the need to intensify dialogue with Bosniak parties. Covic criticized the current structure of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Presidency, where two Bosniak members hold positions while Croats lack representation, arguing that this has hindered progress in the country. He saw
Bias read (Right): The article presents Covic's perspective emphasizing the need for Croats to address historical grievances regarding representation in the Bosnian presidency, which frames the issue through a nationalist lens. The framing highlights the importance of resolving these issues to prevent future problems,
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
BA