ON
← Back to feed
EFF BRIEFING: Malema denies shielding Khan, defends controversial praise for former Idac chief
ZA🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive24 days ago

EFF BRIEFING: Malema denies shielding Khan, defends controversial praise for former Idac chief

Julius Malema, leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), denied allegations that he is shielding Feroz Khan, a criminally charged deputy head of Crime Intelligence, and defended his controversial praise for former Idac head Andrea Johnson. During a press conference, Malema rejected claims that the EFF is involved in wrongdoing and emphasized that there is no evidence linking the party to any misconduct. He addressed two main controversies: first, his comparison of Johnson to Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, which he explained was based solely on her testimony before the parliamentary ad hoc committee and not related to later allegations against her at the Madlanga Commission. Second, he refuted accusations from MK Party MP Vusi Shongwe that he prevented Khan from being called before the ad hoc committee. Malema stated that his actions were not aimed at shielding Khan.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has accepted the immediate resignation of Advocate Andrea Johnson, the head of the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), following a formal request from Johnson. The move comes after weeks of intense scrutiny at the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, where Johnson faced rigorous questioning over IDAC's investigations into senior officials within the South African Police Service's (SAPS) Crime Intelligence division. Johnson submitted a letter to both Ramaphosa and the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Advocate Andy Mothibi, requesting that her three-month notice period be waived and that she vacate her office immediately. The Presidency confirmed on Monday that Ramaphosa had approved the request, following recommendations from Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi and Mothibi. Johnson cited the past five months as particularly challenging, marked by "unprecedented" personal and professional attacks. Much of the criticism centered around IDAC's investigations into Crime Intelligence officials, which she said had drawn "extreme negative attention" to both herself and the institution. In her resignation letter, Johnson expressed concern that her continued presence in the role could pose a reputational risk to IDAC and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). While acknowledging that the allegations against her remained unproven, she warned that any inquiry into her conduct would likely involve another commission of inquiry, a prospect she deemed too costly and disruptive for the country, especially given South Africa's ongoing scrutiny by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The controversy surrounding Johnson's tenure escalated significantly after her testimony before the Madlanga Commission. During her appearance, she admitted to making "key errors" and providing incorrect timelines and facts regarding IDAC's investigations during her earlier briefing to Parliament's Ad Hoc Committee. Among the admissions, Johnson acknowledged that IDAC had previously solicited a Section 27 affidavit regarding Crime Intelligence Chief Dumisani Khumalo, despite initially denying that the unit had received such a document. She also conceded that IDAC had no legal basis to investigate Khumalo and should not have solicited complaints from the public to initiate the probe. Johnson faced further scrutiny over her characterization of Brigadier Dineo Mokwele's appointment as a "token" appointment. She later withdrew that description and admitted she had not personally verified Mokwele's academic qualifications before approving her arrest for fraud. This admission raised concerns about the integrity of IDAC's investigations, particularly the case against Khumalo, which was built on allegations related to Mokwele's irregular appointment. Corruption Watch spokesperson Janine Erasmus emphasized that the collapse of the Mokwele case could undermine the entire fraud and corruption charge against Khumalo, potentially affecting other cases authorized by Johnson. The resignation of Johnson follows the withdrawal of fraud and corruption charges against Khumalo and other Crime Intelligence officials. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) confirmed the charges were dropped after a review of the case and representations from the accused's legal team. This development occurred shortly after Johnson's resignation request was accepted, highlighting the complex interplay between her leadership and the outcomes of IDAC's investigations. Johnson's departure marks the end of a long and contentious chapter in her career. With over three decades of service in the NPA, including roles as deputy director of public prosecutions at the Directorate of Special Operations (Scorpions) and head of the Investigating Directorate, Johnson had been a prominent figure in South Africa's anti-corruption efforts. Her resignation leaves a void in the leadership of IDAC, an institution tasked with combating corruption and ensuring transparency within the justice system. As the country continues to grapple with issues of accountability and institutional integrity, the implications of Johnson's exit remain to be seen.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

IOL (Independent Online) logoIOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7525 days ago
Malema responds to Madlanga Commission scrutiny and impeachment committee interdict

Julius Malema, leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), responded to scrutiny from the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, which investigated alleged coordination between suspended Crime Intelligence head Major-General Feroz Khan and tobacco executive Mohamed Sayed. The commission alleged that Malema was involved in plans to remove former Inspector-General of Intelligence Setlhomamaru Dintwe and received confidential information. Malema criticized the commission for maintaining secrecy around its preliminary findings and accused opponents of making 'politically motivated insinuations' based on unverified claims. He emphasized the need for transparency, rejected tabloid journalism as credible evidence, and stated he would not comment on testimony from former IDAC head Andrea Johnson due to his focus on campaigning ahead of the November 4 election.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the Madlanga Commission as a politically motivated attack on Malema and the EFF, emphasizing the lack of evidence against them and criticizing the commission's handling of sensitive information. The language suggests skepticism toward the opposition's claims

Why factuality (85): The article presents the content of Julius Malema's speech and outlines the allegations against him from the Madlanga Commission. It references specific documents like WhatsApp messages between Feroz Khan and Mohamed Sayed, which are cited as evidence. While no primary source is available, the artic

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but includes emotionally charged language such as 'juvenile and politically motivated insinuations' which suggests a critical stance toward the Commission's findings. The focus on Malema's response implies a particular perspective, though it does not ov

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 6024 days ago
EFF BRIEFING: Malema denies shielding Khan, defends controversial praise for former Idac chief

Julius Malema, leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), denied allegations that he is shielding Feroz Khan, a criminally charged deputy head of Crime Intelligence, and defended his controversial praise for former Idac head Andrea Johnson. During a press conference, Malema rejected claims that the EFF is involved in wrongdoing and emphasized that there is no evidence linking the party to any misconduct. He addressed two main controversies: first, his comparison of Johnson to Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, which he explained was based solely on her testimony before the parliamentary ad hoc committee and not related to later allegations against her at the Madlanga Commission. Second, he refuted accusations from MK Party MP Vusi Shongwe that he prevented Khan from being called before the ad hoc committee. Malema stated that his actions were not aimed at shielding Khan.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Malema's denials and the allegations against him without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from Malema and references to opposing claims, providing a balanced account of the situation without evident bias toward either the EFF or its critics.

Why factuality (60): The article discusses Julius Malema's denial of ties to figures involved in the Madlanga Commission, but it does not mention the primary source document about Fadiel Adams. The content is unrelated to the event described in the primary source, making it irrelevant for factuality assessment.

Why objectivity (60): The article presents Malema's statements neutrally but frames the situation around political tensions and allegations without providing balanced context or opposing viewpoints.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories