NBA rejects alleged AGF directives on 2026 election

Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenter23 hr. ago

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has rejected alleged directives from the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) aimed at postponing its 2026 national officers' election. The NBA claims these directives are unconstitutional and beyond the AGF's authority under the Legal Practitioners Act. The AGF reportedly proposed measures including dissolving the Electoral Committee, introducing NIN verification, and amending the NBA constitution. The NBA asserts it never received official communication regarding these recommendations and argues they mirror relief requests from ongoing legal cases. The conflict arises amid litigation over the 2026 election, with the AGF convening a stakeholders' meeting to mediate. The NBA maintains that the AGF acted as a mediator rather than an authoritative body and that only the National Executive Council has the power to make such decisions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without overt ideological slant. It reports the NBA's rejection of the AGF's directives while also detailing the AGF's involvement in attempting to mediate the election crisis. The tone remains neutral, focusing on legal arguments and institutional prer

The PunchIndependentCenteryesterday

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has denied reports that the 2026 National Officers' Election has been postponed, asserting that such action would require approval from its National Executive Council. In response to alleged directives from the Attorney General of the Federation, the NBA called the claims unconstitutional, arguing that the AG lacks authority to interfere in the association's affairs. The purported directives included dissolving the Electoral Committee, postponing the election, replacing the election service provider, forming a caretaker committee, incorporating national ID numbers into voting, and revising the constitution to eliminate universal suffrage. The NBA emphasized its independence and noted that the report was not officially communicated or signed by the AG's office, casting doubt on its authenticity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the NBA's stance without overt ideological slant, focusing on legal arguments and institutional authority rather than partisan perspectives. While the conflict between the NBA and the Attorney General is politically significant, the reporting does not favor either side with emot