Bivši načelnik Glavnog stožera: ‘Kundid ne odgovara samo predsjedniku. Što sada? Ima dvije mogućnosti‘
Former Chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Josip Lucić, stated that current Chief of the General Staff, General Tihomir Kundid, is not solely accountable to the President of Croatia but also to the Government, the Minister of Defense, and the Croatian Parliament. Lucić emphasized that Kundid was appointed by the President based on a proposal from the Government with the approval of the Parliament, meaning his actions must align with legal frameworks and institutional oversight. The President, Zoran Milanović, has reiterated his decision that members of the Croatian military will not participate in a military parade in Paris on July 14th and ordered Kundid to carry out this directive. However, Lucić warned that if Kundid follows the President’s order, which he claims contradicts the Law on Defense, Kundid could face legal sanctions. He noted that the law takes precedence over both the President and the Chief of the General Staff, and that previous Presidents, including Stjepan Mesić, had respected these legal boundaries. Lucić suggested Kundid has two options: either comply with the President’s order and risk legal consequences or refuse and potentially face re-
Bivši načelnik Glavnog stožera Oružanih snaga RH Josip Lucić dao je duboko i kontroverzan komentar o situaciji oko načelnika Glavnog stožera Tihomira Kundida, koji se odnosila na zapovijed predsjednika Zorana Milanovića o povlačenju vojnika na vojni mimohod u Parizu. Prema Lucićevom izlaganju, Kundid nije uključen u proces izbora, već je bio izabran na prijedlog Vlade, uz suglasnost Hrvatskog sabora, i predložen predsjedniku. Međutim, njegova uloga nije ograničena samo na predsjednika, već uključuje i Vlado, ministra obrane i Hrvatski sabor. Ovo je otvorilo novu dimenziju konflikta, gdje se pitanje pravosudnosti i zakonske pravilnosti postavilo na središte.
Lucić je naglasio da je predsjednik Milanović ponovno poručio da će vojnikovski sudionici u Parizu biti izbačeni, što je uključivalo i zapovijed za Kundida. Međutim, Lucić je istaknuo da je predsjednikova zapovijed mora biti utemeljena na zakonu, a Kundid ne smije provoditi zapovijede koje su suprotne Zakonu o obrani. U slučaju da bi Kundid proveo takvu zapovijed, to bi značilo kršenje zakona, što bi rezultiralo sankcijama. Lucić je također napomenuo da je zakon iznad svih, uključujući i predsjednika, i da svi, uključujući Kundida, moraju ga primjenjivati. Ovo je pokazalo da je situacija izuzetno složena i da se ne može jednodimenzionalno razumjeti.
U skladu s člankom 69. stavkom 5. Zakona o obrani, odluka o prelasku granice radi protokolarno-ceremonijalnih aktivnosti te postrojbi razine voda i niže donosi ministar obrane. Zakon ne propisuje da je potrebna suglasnost predsjednika za takvu odluku, što je bilo ključno u ovom slučaju. Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić je donio odluku o slanju dvadesetak vojnika u Pariz, što je bilo u skladu s zakonom. Međutim, predsjednik Milanović je tražio da Kundid izvrši svoju zapovijed, što je uključivalo i izbacivanje vojnika iz Pariza. Ovo je izazvalo pitanje koliko je predsjednikova zapovijed u skladu s zakonom, a kako bi Kundid trebao reagirati.
Ministar obrane Anušić je objasnio da je Kundid, kao načelnik Glavnog stožera, bio pod pritiskom predsjednika i da je imao izbor između poštovanja odluke ministra obrane ili predsjednika. Međutim, Anušić je istaknuo da je predsjednikova zapovijed suprotna zakonu, što je izazvalo pitanje o pravosudnosti i autoritetu. U skladu s člankom 205. Zakona o službi u oružanim snagama, Anušić je mogao umirovititi Kundida bez suglasnosti predsjednika, što je pokazalo da postoje mehanizmi za rješavanje takvih situacija. Međutim, Kundid nema zamjenika, što je dodatno komplikiralo situaciju.
Situacija je preselila se u Hrvatski sabor, gdje su zastupnici razmotrili mogućnosti daljeg rješavanja. Predsjednik sabora Gordan Jandroković je naglasio da je predsjednikova zapovijed apsolutno neprihvatljiva i da može imati opasne posljedice. U skladu s ovim, zastupnici su izrazili zabrinutost o tome da se ne prelazi preko kršenja zakona, što bi moglo voditi u anarhiju. Osim toga, suštično pitanje je bilo da li će vojnikovski sudionici u Parizu predstavljati Hrvatsku, a ne predsjednika ili Vlade, što je izazvalo debatu o autentičnosti i značenju takvih događaja.
U skladu s ovim, postoji mogućnost da će se situacija riješiti putem iznenađenja ili drugih pravnih sredstava. Međutim, ključno je da se ne prelazi preko zakona, jer to može imati šire posljedice za autoritet i stabilnost države. Uz to, postoji i mogućnost da će se razmotriti izmjene zakona kako bi se izbjegao takav scenarij u budućnosti. Ova situacija pokazuje kompleksnost interakcija između različitih institucija i kako se pitanja pravosudnosti i autoriteta mogu preklapati u praksi.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Former Chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Josip Lucić, stated that current Chief of the General Staff, General Tihomir Kundid, is not solely accountable to the President of Croatia but also to the Government, the Minister of Defense, and the Croatian Parliament. Lucić emphasized that Kundid was appointed by the President based on a proposal from the Government with the approval of the Parliament, meaning his actions must align with legal frameworks and institutional oversight. The President, Zoran Milanović, has reiterated his decision that members of the Croatian military will not participate in a military parade in Paris on July 14th and ordered Kundid to carry out this directive. However, Lucić warned that if Kundid follows the President’s order, which he claims contradicts the Law on Defense, Kundid could face legal sanctions. He noted that the law takes precedence over both the President and the Chief of the General Staff, and that previous Presidents, including Stjepan Mesić, had respected these legal boundaries. Lucić suggested Kundid has two options: either comply with the President’s order and risk legal consequences or refuse and potentially face re-
Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from former and current military officials regarding the legal and constitutional responsibilities of the Chief of the General Staff. It includes balanced quotes from Josip Lucić, who outlines the legal framework and potential consequences for non-compliance, aswell
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): This article includes expert commentary and explains the legal and strategic implications of the military parade. While it offers a nuanced view, it still carries some political bias in its interpretation of the situation.
Večernji listIndependentRightFactual 70Objective 602 days ago
The article discusses the legal framework governing military command in Croatia, focusing on the authority of the President of the Republic versus the Minister of Defense. It references Article 69, paragraph 5 of the Defense Act, which grants the Minister of Defense exclusive authority to decide on border crossings for ceremonial purposes, without requiring approval from the President. The article critiques the current interpretation by Arsen Bauk, a member of the Parliamentary Committee on Defense, who claims that the Chief of the General Staff would prioritize orders from the President over those of the Minister of Defense. This contradicts the law, which clearly states that the Minister of Defense has sole authority in such matters. The article questions whether Bauk’s interpretation aligns with the legal provisions established in 2013 under Prime Minister Zoran Milanović’s government.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the discussion around the President's potential unconstitutional orders and criticizes the current interpretation by Bauk, implying that the President's authority is being overstretched. The tone suggests skepticism toward the President's influence over military decisions and a re
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): Significantly diverges from the primary source, focusing on unrelated legal cases and personal comments. Objectivity is low due to emotional and speculative language.
The article discusses a political conflict between President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of Croatian military personnel to a humanitarian mission in Paris. The disagreement escalated into tensions within the government, leading to the issue being brought before the Parliament. The situation involves the potential removal of General Tihomir Kundid, the head of the General Staff, due to his refusal to comply with the president’s order. Minister Ivan Anušić claims that Kundid has changed his stance under pressure from the president, potentially violating the law. Meanwhile, the government is considering alternative measures, including sending police forces instead of military personnel. Lawmakers have expressed concerns over the legality of the president’s directive and its implications for national sovereignty.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents a politically sensitive issue involving high-level government figures, it does not exhibit clear ideological leaning. It reports on both sides of the debate—criticism of the president’s decision by lawmakers and support for the government’s legal arguments. The tone is non
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Croatia
