ON
← Back to feed
MPs ‘failing to learn lesson’ over freebies after accepting £400,000 of hospitality
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

MPs ‘failing to learn lesson’ over freebies after accepting £400,000 of hospitality

MPs have continued to accept significant amounts of free hospitality despite public backlash, with nearly £400,000 in tickets and gifts received this year. Notable cases include Louise Haigh, Lucy Powell, and Wes Streeting accepting high-value event tickets, including a Harry Styles concert and Chelsea Flower Show. These incidents come amid ongoing scrutiny of politicians accepting free tickets, particularly following criticism of Keir Starmer for receiving football tickets. While some ministers, like Rachel Reeves, have stated they will avoid free tickets, others, such as Matthew Pennycock, have taken different stances. The total value of free hospitality accepted by MPs has risen from around £300,000 annually to nearly £400,000.

MPs have continued to accept substantial amounts of hospitality despite public criticism following the controversy around Prime Minister Keir Starmer's acceptance of free tickets to football matches and other events. Recent disclosures reveal that nearly £400,000 in free tickets, hospitality and gifts has been accepted by members of Parliament between January and July of this year, surpassing previous levels of such activity. Notable figures including Louise Haigh, Lucy Powell and Wes Streeting have accepted high-value hospitality, with some of them later appointed to cabinet roles. Among the latest revelations, Lucy Powell, the deputy leader and education secretary, received £858 worth of tickets to a Harry Styles concert at Wembley from the PRS for Music industry group. Wes Streeting, the defence secretary, accepted £1,839 worth of tickets to the Chelsea flower show from Lloyds Banking Group. Louise Haigh took a £1,314 ticket to the Ivor Novello awards, while Anneliese Midgley, the chief whip, enjoyed hospitality at the Brit Awards for two worth £3,432. Additional hospitality included £350 from Flutter for attendance at the Cheltenham festival horse racing and £560 for tickets to the Grand National. These individuals were all backbench MPs before being promoted to cabinet positions under Andy Burnham. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, accepted £1,480 worth of tickets to the men’s Wimbledon singles final during her cabinet tenure. Ellie Reeves, the attorney general, accepted a £1,314 ticket to the Ivors while serving as solicitor general. Andy Burnham, who has since become the prime minister, declared hospitality worth approximately £6,000 this year, primarily linked to his former role as mayor of Greater Manchester, including £3,800 in tickets to the Brit Awards in Manchester and £500 for attendance at Ladies’ Day at the Grand National in Aintree. The practice of accepting free hospitality by MPs appeared to decline after mid-2024, following the scrutiny surrounding Starmer’s acceptance of football tickets. In March 2025, Rachel Reeves, then chancellor, stated she would not accept free concert tickets again after facing criticism for using them to take a family member to see Sabrina Carpenter at the O2 arena. She justified her decision on security grounds but acknowledged understanding public sentiment regarding the issue. At the same time, Matthew Pennycock, another government minister, claimed he had accepted “zero” free concert tickets, expressing personal disapproval of the practice. He noted that individual MPs made their own decisions on whether to accept such offers. According to reports from The Times in December 2025, the value of free tickets accepted by MPs was estimated at around £300,000 annually. However, this figure appears to have risen significantly, with almost £400,000 in complimentary tickets, hospitality and other gifts disclosed between January and July of this year, excluding foreign travel expenses. Sue Hawley, director of Spotlight on Corruption, called for MPs to reconsider their acceptance of free tickets, suggesting that some ministers and MPs seem to have forgotten the freebie-gate scandal that initially affected the early days of Starmer’s leadership. Duncan Hames, director of policy at Transparency International UK, emphasized that while receiving gifts and hospitality may be permissible, it does not imply appropriateness. He pointed out that such practices represent a well-established lobbying strategy employed by large businesses and foreign governments. According to him, there is no valid justification for elected officials to accept invitations and tickets to events unrelated to their parliamentary duties or local constituency work.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)IndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 402 days ago
MPs ‘failing to learn lesson’ over freebies after accepting £400,000 of hospitality

MPs have continued to accept significant amounts of free hospitality despite public backlash, with nearly £400,000 in tickets and gifts received this year. Notable cases include Louise Haigh, Lucy Powell, and Wes Streeting accepting high-value event tickets, including a Harry Styles concert and Chelsea Flower Show. These incidents come amid ongoing scrutiny of politicians accepting free tickets, particularly following criticism of Keir Starmer for receiving football tickets. While some ministers, like Rachel Reeves, have stated they will avoid free tickets, others, such as Matthew Pennycock, have taken different stances. The total value of free hospitality accepted by MPs has risen from around £300,000 annually to nearly £400,000.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of MPs to heed past criticisms, emphasizing the continued acceptance of free hospitality despite public outrage. It highlights specific instances where left-leaning figures (e.g., Labour Party members) accepted expensive tickets, suggesting a critique of the

Why factuality (50): The article contains several factual inaccuracies. It incorrectly states that the Ministerial Code was last updated in 2026 when the primary source shows it was last updated on 29 June 2026 but does not mention any specific content change related to that date. The article also mentions specific indi

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'failing to learn their lesson' and 'outcry in 2024', suggesting bias against MPs. It frames the issue as a failure rather than presenting both sides of the argument, showing a clear lack of neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories