Delhi Police arrests two inter-state arms traffickers from Rajasthan, UP
Delhi Police has arrested two individuals involved in inter-state arms trafficking. The suspects were apprehended in connection with illegal arms trade activities spanning across states of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. This arrest highlights ongoing efforts by law enforcement to curb cross-border criminal networks engaged in weapons smuggling. The incident underscores the challenges faced by authorities in managing organized crime that operates across state boundaries. No further details regarding the operation or the specific charges against the accused were provided in the report.
A mother-son pair has been arrested in Delhi along with another individual in connection with an armed robbery at the home of a 74-year-old man in north Delhi’s Roop Nagar. The suspects, identified as Saroj (54), her son Manoj alias Lala (28), and Rajeev alias Ramu (25), were apprehended after a 13-day manhunt spanning several districts in Uttar Pradesh. According to police, the crime occurred around 3 am on August 7 when four armed men broke into the victim’s home, holding him and his wife hostage. The robbers reportedly stole approximately ₹10 lakh in cash, along with gold and silver jewelry, and took the digital video recorder containing CCTV footage from the house. Recovered from the suspects' possession were ₹2.08 lakh in Indian currency, 250 British pounds, and $160 in US dollars. The investigation began immediately after the incident, with police analyzing footage from over 500 CCTV cameras across the region to trace the suspects’ movements over nearly 1,000 kilometers. Based on the evidence, officers traced the suspects to Basai Darapur in Delhi, identifying a room they had occupied. Technical surveillance and local intelligence helped identify the three individuals, who were linked to prior criminal activities in Uttar Pradesh. Ram Khiladi, one of the suspects, had been previously implicated in five cases involving robbery, murder, and theft, while Deepak had been charged in 15 cases related to robbery with murder and attempted murder across different areas of the state. On August 9, police intercepted Ram Khiladi near Madhavan Toll Plaza in Mathura. During the encounter, he opened fire at the officers, prompting them to retaliate with two shots. Despite the exchange, the suspect escaped due to darkness and heavy traffic. A separate case was registered against him at Farah police station in Mathura. Meanwhile, police cross-referenced the registration details of a scooter captured in CCTV footage. A mobile number linked to the vehicle was found to be connected to Ram Khiladi. Further analysis revealed that the registered owner’s number was also in communication with Saroj, a former domestic worker at the victim’s residence. Saroj had worked at the victim’s home for about 15 years before being dismissed three years ago after allegedly stealing ₹50,000. During her tenure, she became familiar with the household’s financial status, personal belongings, and the fact that the elderly couple lived alone. Upon her arrest on August 20, Saroj confessed to sharing information about the victim’s wealth and family with her son Manoj. Police allege that Manoj and his associate Rajeev collaborated with Navratan and his relatives, including Ram Khiladi, Deepak, and Bhim, to carry out the robbery. While Manoj remained in Basai Darapur, fearing recognition by the victims, the others executed the crime. In a separate development, Delhi Police arrested two individuals from Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh on charges of inter-state arms trafficking. The arrests highlight ongoing efforts to curb illegal weapons trade across state borders. Additionally, authorities apprehended a 65-year-old man named Natthu, also known as Natthulal, from the Hardoi district of Uttar Pradesh. He had been evading justice since 1984 when a murder case was first registered against him at Janakpuri police station in Delhi. His capture marks the culmination of decades-long pursuit by law enforcement agencies. The case underscores the complexity of cross-border crimes and the role of insider knowledge in facilitating such offenses. With the recovery of stolen goods and the identification of key players, police continue to investigate potential links between the suspects and other criminal networks. As the probe unfolds, further details about the planning and execution of the robbery are expected to emerge, shedding light on the broader context of organized crime in the region.
3 reports
The PrintIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 808/21/2026
Delhi Police has arrested two individuals involved in inter-state arms trafficking. The suspects were apprehended in connection with illegal arms trade activities spanning across states of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. This arrest highlights ongoing efforts by law enforcement to curb cross-border criminal networks engaged in weapons smuggling. The incident underscores the challenges faced by authorities in managing organized crime that operates across state boundaries. No further details regarding the operation or the specific charges against the accused were provided in the report.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a law enforcement action without apparent ideological framing. It does not present any particular political viewpoint, nor does it emphasize one side over another. The focus is purely on the operational aspect of the arrest and the issue of inter-state crime.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on an arrest made by Delhi Police involving two individuals from Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. While no primary source document was available, the claim aligns with typical police reporting style and is likely based on official statements or press releases. It lacks specific detai
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner without overt bias or emotional language. It focuses on the action taken by the police without commentary on the broader implications or context, maintaining a neutral tone.
A 65-year-old man named Natthu, also known as Natthulal, from the Hardoi district of Uttar Pradesh, has been arrested by Delhi Police after evading justice for over 30 years. The arrest comes nearly four decades after a murder case was registered against him in 1984 at Janakpuri police station in Delhi. Natthu fled immediately after the incident and remained at large until his recent capture. This case highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement in tracking down fugitives over extended periods.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal case involving a fugitive who was finally apprehended after many years. There is no evident ideological framing, biased language, or selective emphasis on particular perspectives. It simply reports the event without apparent slant toward any side.
Why factuality (75): The article provides basic details about the accused, including his age, name, and the timeline of the case. It mentions he fled after a murder and was caught by Delhi Police. While these facts align with typical reporting on such cases, there is no specific evidence or primary source cited to confi
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the story in a straightforward manner, focusing on the chronological events. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'fled after a murder' which may imply guilt without judicial confirmation. The tone leans slightly towards sensationalism, though not overtly biased.
The PrintIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 808/23/2026
The Delhi Police arrested a man for creating graffiti at the Parliament Street police station. The incident involved unauthorized artwork on the premises of a law enforcement facility. Authorities reportedly took swift action against the individual, citing violations of local regulations regarding public spaces. No further details were provided about the nature of the graffiti or the legal basis for the arrest.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report of a police action without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the procedural aspect of the arrest and does not take a clear stance on the legality or morality of the act beyond standard law enforcement protocol. There is no evident left or right leaning in
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the event in a neutral tone, focusing on the action taken by authorities without expressing personal opinion or bias. However, it uses slightly emotive language like 'arrests' which can carry connotations, though this is standard in news reporting.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
