ON
← Back to feed
Less time to prepare and more hearings: why US deportation orders are increasing
AR🏛️ PoliticsCenter15 days ago

Less time to prepare and more hearings: why US deportation orders are increasing

The U.S. immigration court system is undergoing rapid changes under the Trump administration, which aims to reduce a backlog of cases that has accumulated over decades. To achieve this, the government has increased the frequency of 'mega hearings,' where a single judge handles more than 50 cases in a short period. This approach has led to fewer preparation times for immigrants, who now have less than a month to gather documents, find legal representation, and prepare evidence, previously around six months. As a result, many immigrants miss their hearings and automatically receive deportation orders. According to data analyzed by the organization Mobile Pathways, over 1,300 mega hearings were held nationwide in June alone, nearly three times the number recorded in June of the previous year. The compressed timelines and heavy caseloads make it difficult for judges to thoroughly review asylum claims, leading to potentially valid cases being closed before they are properly examined.

The U.S. immigration courts are under unprecedented strain, with a dramatic increase in deportation orders driven by accelerated processing and shortened preparation times for immigrants. According to reports from multiple media outlets, the system has been transformed under the administration of former President Donald Trump, which has intensified efforts to reduce backlogs that have accumulated over decades. This shift has led to more frequent “megaaudiencias,” or mass hearings, where a single judge handles over 50 cases within hours. These changes have significantly reduced the time available for immigrants to gather documents, secure legal representation, and prepare their defense, often cutting the window from six months to just over one month. The impact of this rapid acceleration is evident in rising rates of non-attendance at court hearings and subsequent deportation orders. Data analyzed by Mobile Pathways, an organization tracking immigration court activity, shows that during June 2026 alone, over 1,300 such mass hearings were held nationwide, a nearly threefold increase compared to the same month in the previous year. The number of cases handled per judge in a single day has surged, with some courts reporting hundreds of cases processed in one session. Meanwhile, the notice period for upcoming hearings has been drastically shortened, leaving many individuals with little opportunity to organize their defenses effectively. As a result, the percentage of undocumented immigrants failing to appear for their scheduled hearings has risen sharply. In January 2025, approximately 20% of individuals missed their appointments, but by June 2026, that figure had doubled to nearly 40%. This trend has directly contributed to a surge in automatic deportation orders. In January 2025, around 33,000 such orders were issued, while by June 2026, the number had climbed to roughly 79,000. Once these orders are finalized, asylum applications are typically deemed abandoned, effectively ending the possibility of legal status for those affected. This situation is playing out daily in immigration court facilities across the country. In Harlingen, Texas, for example, the high volume of megaaudiencias has caused long delays, with many individuals waiting over an hour before being allowed into court buildings. The pressure on the system is further compounded by the increased presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at airports, where they conduct routine checks and detain individuals suspected of violating immigration laws. One recent case involves Matías Pourrain, a 34-year-old Argentine football player who was detained by ICE at Fort Lauderdale International Airport while traveling with his team to Los Angeles for a tournament. Pourrain, who plays in the U.S. second division, reportedly received a brief warning that he would be released in 10 minutes but was not returned to his family. His brother, Juan Pourrain, described the distress of the family, noting that the call they received lasted only five seconds before the authorities cut off communication. The family claims that Pourrain entered the country legally and holds a valid work permit and pending migration status, yet he remains in custody awaiting resolution of his case. Another individual caught up in the heightened enforcement measures is Iliana Lick, a 30-year-old Argentine woman working as a nanny in Philadelphia. She was arrested by ICE at the airport after attempting to travel to Kansas City to watch a World Cup match. Her partner, Steven Melchiorre, recounted how she called him in tears shortly after being detained, informing him of her arrest. Lick had entered the U.S. legally through a tourist visa and was seeking a work visa, with an ongoing application for permanent residency. Despite having no criminal record and consistently paying taxes, she was detained under the expanded ICE operations targeting unauthorized migrants. These incidents highlight the broader strategy of the current administration, which has intensified its focus on border security and immigration enforcement as part of its campaign for the 2024 presidential election. Federal officials have noted a sharp rise in airport arrests, with an average of 20 to 40 detentions per day in recent months, compared to fewer than 10 in May of the previous year. Advocacy groups argue that this approach reflects a deliberate effort to disrupt the movement of undocumented individuals within the country, reversing policies implemented under the Biden administration that allowed such travel.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 85Objective 7520 days ago
Less time to prepare and more hearings: why US deportation orders are increasing

The U.S. immigration court system is undergoing rapid changes under the Trump administration, which aims to reduce a backlog of cases that has accumulated over decades. To achieve this, the government has increased the frequency of 'mega hearings,' where a single judge handles more than 50 cases in a short period. This approach has led to fewer preparation times for immigrants, who now have less than a month to gather documents, find legal representation, and prepare evidence, previously around six months. As a result, many immigrants miss their hearings and automatically receive deportation orders. According to data analyzed by the organization Mobile Pathways, over 1,300 mega hearings were held nationwide in June alone, nearly three times the number recorded in June of the previous year. The compressed timelines and heavy caseloads make it difficult for judges to thoroughly review asylum claims, leading to potentially valid cases being closed before they are properly examined.

Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights policies implemented by the Trump administration that accelerate deportation processes, including reducing preparation time for immigrants and increasing the volume of cases handled per hearing. These actions align with a hardline immigration stance, which is typically aligned

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the primary source document from AP, reporting on the increased use of 'mega' master hearings and reduced preparation time for immigrants. It cites Mobile Pathways and aligns with the data presented. However, it lacks specific citations for some claims and presents a

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but leans slightly towards criticizing the Trump administration's policies. It highlights the negative consequences for immigrants without overtly taking sides, though the emphasis on the impact on individuals may suggest a subtle bias.

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 7015 days ago
United States: Argentine footballer detained by ICE at Florida airport

A 34-year-old Argentine footballer, Matías Pourrain, was detained by U.S. immigration authorities (ICE) at Fort Lauderdale Airport while traveling with his team to Los Angeles for a tournament. The incident occurred during an internal flight from Miami to Los Angeles, where he plays in the U.S. second division. His family and club claim he has valid work permission and ongoing migration procedures. His brother reported that authorities told him Pourrain would return in ten minutes but did not release him. The family alleges pressure to sign documents leading to deportation. Pourrain had previously won a regional championship with Miami United FC and was set to compete in national amateur tournaments. His case highlights concerns over immigration enforcement impacting athletes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the detention of an immigrant athlete as an unjust act by immigration authorities, emphasizing the impact on the individual and their family. It highlights the broader implications of immigration policies on personal freedoms and rights, aligning with left-leaning perspectives onU

Why factuality (70): The article covers the experiences of a farm worker affected by ICE raids and includes quotes from the worker herself. It touches on the broader context of mass deportations under Trump but does not directly reference the primary source document or provide full statistical data on the court backlog.

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting the personal account of the worker and the broader implications of ICE operations. It avoids taking a strongly partisan stance and offers a nuanced view of the issue.

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒CenterFactual 65Objective 8018 days ago
She's Argentine, works as a nanny in the U.S. and was arrested by ICE on her way to watch a World Cup game.

Iliana Lick, a 30-year-old Argentine woman living in Philadelphia since 2023, was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at an airport while traveling with her boyfriend to watch a World Cup match. She had entered the U.S. legally under a travel visa but overstayed her permitted time, leading to her detention. Lick worked as a nanny and had applied for a work visa and residency status. Her boyfriend described the arrest as shocking, noting she had always followed immigration rules and paid taxes. The Department of Homeland Security clarified that pending applications do not grant legal status. Lick remains in custody awaiting resolution of her immigration case, which could result in deportation. This incident occurred amid increased ICE enforcement actions linked to former President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Iliana Lick's immigration status and the circumstances of her arrest. It includes quotes from both her boyfriend and the Department of Homeland Security, providing balanced perspectives. While it mentions the timing of the arrest in relation to Trump's

Why factuality (65): The article provides details about an Argentine woman detained by ICE and includes quotes from her partner. It references the broader context of ICE operations and mentions the political stance of the mayor. However, it does not directly cite the primary source document or provide full context on th

Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the personal story and including perspectives from multiple sources. It avoids strong editorializing and presents the situation without overt bias.

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 50Objective 6522 days ago
Zohran Mamdani, Mayor of New York: I think the ICE raids are cruel and inhumane

The New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, criticized the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, calling them 'cruel' and 'inhuman,' and stated they do not serve public safety interests. During a June press conference related to the 2026 World Cup, Mamdani expressed his opposition to ICE's tactics, emphasizing that such actions are unnecessary for maintaining public order. He directly addressed President Donald Trump, stating that many New Yorkers share this sentiment. Mamdani reiterated that New York City does not cooperate with ICE, asserting that federal agents cannot enter city property without a court order. Additionally, he proposed the complete abolition of ICE and advocated for a more humane immigration system that values immigrants' contributions to society.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of ICE as a progressive stance, using emotionally charged language like 'cruel' and 'inhuman.' It emphasizes the mayor’s alignment with immigrant communities and calls for systemic change, which aligns with left-wing advocacy. The focus on human rights and the callto

Why factuality (50): This article primarily discusses the detention of a football player and includes some context about Trump's immigration policies. It lacks detailed information on the broader court backlog and does not clearly link the incident to the systemic changes described in the primary source.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat sensationalized, particularly in the description of the player's experience. While it reports facts, the narrative style suggests a slight leaning towards highlighting the human cost of immigration enforcement.

Infobae logoInfobaeIndependentConservativeFactual 40Objective 6525 days ago
As Trump pressures Cuba, he plans to send Cuban deportees to Uruguay

The article reports that while President Donald Trump continues to exert pressure on Cuba, he plans to send Cuban deportees to Uruguay. This development comes amid ongoing tensions between the United States and Cuba, particularly regarding immigration policies and human rights concerns. The proposal reflects broader U.S. efforts to address undocumented immigrants from Cuba by redirecting them to third countries. However, the article does not provide further details on the legal basis for this plan, the potential impact on Cuban citizens, or any formal announcements from the U.S. government.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the proposed deportation policy as part of a larger U.S. strategy under Trump, emphasizing the administration's hardline stance toward immigration and its pressure tactics against Cuba. The focus on sending deportees to Uruguay suggests a narrative aligned with conservative policy

Why factuality (40): This article is completely unrelated to Iliana Lick's case and instead discusses broader immigration policy under Trump, specifically regarding deportations to Uruguay. It contains no information relevant to the primary source document or the specific incident involving Iliana Lick.

Why objectivity (65): The article presents information about Trump's immigration policies in a straightforward manner without apparent bias. However, due to its complete lack of relevance to the main event, it cannot be assessed for objectivity in relation to the specific case.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories