ON
← Back to feed
Makarska banned the sale of alcohol after 9 pm, opinions divided
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter12 hr. ago

Makarska banned the sale of alcohol after 9 pm, opinions divided

Makarska je postala prva lokacija u Hrvatskoj koja je zabranila prodaju alkohola u noćnim satima, ograničavajući je od 21 sat do 6 ujutro. Odluka Gradskog vijeća ne obuhvaća ugostiteljske objekte, a gradonačelnik Zoran Paunović navodi slučajeve nereda u okolini Dioklecijanove palače kao motivaciju za odluku. Zamjenica gradonačelnika Antonia Radić Brkan ističe da se zabrana odnosi na trgovine, a ne na restorane. Gosti su podijeljeni u mišljenju: neki smatraju da je odluka korisna za red, dok drugi smatraju da ometanje turista. Kazne za prekršaje mogu doseći desetke tisuća eura.

Makarska has become the first city in Croatia to implement a ban on alcohol sales after 9 p.m., according to local authorities. The decision was made by the City Council and restricts the sale of alcoholic beverages in shops and other retail stores from 9 p.m. until 6 a.m. The restriction does not apply to restaurants and other hospitality venues. The new rule aims to address concerns over public disorder linked to excessive drinking, particularly in areas near historical sites such as the Diocletian Palace in Split. Local officials emphasized that the measure targets retail outlets, including liquor stores, souvenir shops, and bakeries, rather than bars and cafes. The move comes amid growing concerns over the impact of heavy drinking on public safety and order. Makarska’s mayor, Zoran Paunović, cited incidents observed around the Diocletian Palace, where he described scenes of drunkenness, urination, and disorder. He warned against repeating similar problems seen in Split, where nightlife often leads to chaos. Paunović stated that learning from the experiences of neighboring cities like Hvar, Split, and Zadar was crucial. According to Antonia Radić Brkan, deputy mayor of Makarska, these cities had already taken preventive measures, highlighting the importance of acting before issues escalate. Retailers and hospitality workers have mixed reactions to the new regulation. Mario Agić, a bartender in a local restaurant, expressed support, noting that the policy could benefit all hospitality businesses by reducing the number of intoxicated customers seeking alcohol. However, some guests voiced their discontent. A Polish tourist named Jan argued that the measure contradicted the principles of freedom, stating, “This is a free country, right?” In contrast, an Austrian visitor, Benjamin, supported the decision, saying it made sense to prevent drunk individuals from causing disturbances. Norwegian visitors Steve and Aleksandra agreed, emphasizing that limiting alcohol consumption was a reasonable approach in a country with existing regulations on drinking. Residents of Makarska have also shared varied opinions. Some welcomed the initiative, believing it would contribute to a safer environment. One local resident, Luka, acknowledged that while drinkers might find alternative ways to consume alcohol, the decision was still a positive step. Others remained skeptical, suggesting that the measure would not significantly alter behavior. Officials confirmed that enforcement will fall under the jurisdiction of inspections, with fines potentially reaching several thousand euros for violations. The new regulation is set to take effect within a few days. Authorities have indicated that they will monitor compliance closely and enforce penalties where necessary. While the immediate impact of the policy remains uncertain, the city council has expressed confidence in its potential to improve public order and enhance the overall experience for both residents and tourists. The implementation of this rule marks a notable shift in how local governments in Croatia are addressing alcohol-related challenges, reflecting broader discussions on balancing personal freedoms with community well-being.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7512 hr. ago
Makarska banned the sale of alcohol after 9 pm, opinions divided

Makarska je postala prva lokacija u Hrvatskoj koja je zabranila prodaju alkohola u noćnim satima, ograničavajući je od 21 sat do 6 ujutro. Odluka Gradskog vijeća ne obuhvaća ugostiteljske objekte, a gradonačelnik Zoran Paunović navodi slučajeve nereda u okolini Dioklecijanove palače kao motivaciju za odluku. Zamjenica gradonačelnika Antonia Radić Brkan ističe da se zabrana odnosi na trgovine, a ne na restorane. Gosti su podijeljeni u mišljenju: neki smatraju da je odluka korisna za red, dok drugi smatraju da ometanje turista. Kazne za prekršaje mogu doseći desetke tisuća eura.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the issue by quoting multiple perspectives from local officials and tourists. While the decision itself has political implications related to regulation and public safety, the reporting does not take a clear ideological stance. It includes both supportive and

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Makarska has banned alcohol sales from 9 PM to 6 AM, citing the city council's decision. It includes direct quotes from officials like Zoran Paunović and Antonia Radić Brkan, explaining the rationale behind the ban and clarifying that it does not apply to restaura

Why objectivity (75): The article presents both sides of the issue, including support from local officials and concerns from some tourists. However, it leans slightly toward supporting the policy by emphasizing the potential benefits and quoting officials more prominently than critics. While it attempts to remain balance

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories