ON
← Back to feed
Haaretz logo🏛️ Politics
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter21 hr. ago

Last Israeli election, 9 percent of votes were trashed. Will it happen again?

The article discusses concerns over the potential invalidation of votes in upcoming Israeli elections, referencing the previous election where 9% of ballots were deemed invalid. This issue raises questions about electoral integrity and the possibility of similar occurrences in future elections.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Haaretz logoHaaretzIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 8021 hr. ago
Last Israeli election, 9 percent of votes were trashed. Will it happen again?

The article discusses concerns over the potential invalidation of votes in upcoming Israeli elections, referencing the previous election where 9% of ballots were deemed invalid. This issue raises questions about electoral integrity and the possibility of similar occurrences in future elections.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual question regarding the potential invalidation of votes without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It does not favor any particular side but rather highlights a concern that could affect both major political factions equally.

Why factuality (75): The article references the 9% of votes being trashed from the last Israeli election, which aligns with commonly reported figures from official election authorities. Since no primary source was available, the factuality score is based on cross-source consensus among reputable media outlets covering I

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the issue neutrally, asking a question about whether the phenomenon will recur. It does not take sides or express strong opinions, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories