ON
← Back to feed
The technology that explains why some buildings withstand a strong earthquake while others collapse in seconds
CO🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 hr. ago

The technology that explains why some buildings withstand a strong earthquake while others collapse in seconds

The article discusses the impact of earthquakes on urban areas, using recent events in Venezuela as an example. It highlights the importance of preparedness and technological solutions like seismic isolation systems to improve building resilience during earthquakes. The piece explains how seismic isolation technology works, noting that it can significantly reduce structural damage by decoupling ground movement from building motion. It describes two main types of seismic isolators—elastomeric and frictional—and their benefits, including energy absorption and controlled lateral displacement. While the article emphasizes the potential of this technology to save lives and protect infrastructure, it does not take a clear stance on which countries or regions are more advanced in implementing these measures.

A powerful earthquake struck Venezuela on June 24, triggering two consecutive tremors that devastated parts of the country. The disaster left hundreds of families displaced and emergency teams still working tirelessly to locate survivors. Amid the chaos, experts have turned their attention to a critical factor that determines whether buildings survive such catastrophes: advanced seismic isolation technology. The recent earthquakes in Venezuela highlighted the vulnerability of structures built without modern safety measures. In contrast, some buildings withstood the shaking with minimal damage. This disparity has sparked renewed interest in seismic isolation systems, which allow structures to absorb and dissipate energy during ground movement. These technologies can significantly reduce the impact of earthquakes, offering crucial protection to both infrastructure and human life. Seismic isolation works by decoupling the movement of the ground from the building itself. This is achieved through specialized devices installed at the base of structures. According to Seismic Intelligence, a company specializing in this field, these isolators can reduce forces and deformations by up to 80 percent. This means that even during major quakes, the structural integrity of buildings remains largely intact. There are two primary types of seismic isolators: rubber-based and friction-based. Rubber isolators consist of layers of natural rubber and steel, sometimes including a lead core to enhance energy dissipation. Friction isolators operate using a sliding mechanism over polished steel surfaces, allowing controlled lateral movement while maintaining vertical stiffness comparable to reinforced concrete columns. Both types offer long-term durability, with lifespans exceeding five decades under normal conditions. These systems are increasingly being used in new constructions and retrofitted into existing buildings. They are particularly valuable in hospitals, bridges, data centers, museums, residential complexes, offices, commercial centers, and historic sites. Their application helps ensure that essential services remain operational even after a quake, minimizing disruption and enhancing public safety. The importance of seismic isolation was underscored by the recent events in Venezuela. While no one can predict when an earthquake will strike, engineers emphasize that preparedness is key. Technologies like Google’s Android-based early warning systems provide precious seconds for evacuation or sheltering. However, the design and construction of buildings play a decisive role in determining how well they withstand seismic activity. Experts stress that while earthquakes themselves cannot be prevented, their effects on buildings can be mitigated through engineering innovation. As more regions face rising seismic risks due to tectonic shifts and urban expansion, the adoption of seismic isolation becomes not just beneficial, but essential. The lessons learned from Venezuela serve as a sobering reminder of the need for resilient infrastructure and proactive planning in earthquake-prone areas.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 90yesterday
The technology that explains why some buildings withstand a strong earthquake while others collapse in seconds

The article discusses the impact of earthquakes on urban areas, using recent events in Venezuela as an example. It highlights the importance of preparedness and technological solutions like seismic isolation systems to improve building resilience during earthquakes. The piece explains how seismic isolation technology works, noting that it can significantly reduce structural damage by decoupling ground movement from building motion. It describes two main types of seismic isolators—elastomeric and frictional—and their benefits, including energy absorption and controlled lateral displacement. While the article emphasizes the potential of this technology to save lives and protect infrastructure, it does not take a clear stance on which countries or regions are more advanced in implementing these measures.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about earthquake-resistant technologies and their application in construction without overtly favoring any political ideology or agenda. It focuses on technical explanations and general principles rather than taking a partisan position on policies or governance. The

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the recent earthquakes in Venezuela on June 24 and mentions the volcanic activity as a related phenomenon. It also provides a factual explanation of seismic isolation technology from Seismic Intelligence. However, it lacks specific details about the magnitude of the

Why objectivity (90): The article presents information in a neutral and informative manner, avoiding overt bias or emotional language. It discusses both the risks of earthquakes and available protective technologies without taking sides or expressing strong opinions.

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenter9 hr. ago
Strong earthquake shook Mexico on the morning of July 18: it had a magnitude of 5.2 degrees

On Saturday, July 18, a magnitude 5.2 earthquake struck Mexico at 4:59 AM, centered in Puerto Madero with a depth of 45 kilometers. The tremor was felt across southern Mexico and Central American countries including Panama and San Andrés. It occurred shortly after a stronger 7.4 earthquake off the coast of Chiapas and was followed by approximately 137 aftershocks. Authorities reported no significant damage or casualties. The article also notes recent major earthquakes in Venezuela, where two strong quakes measuring 7.2 and 7.5 caused over 3,000 deaths and nearly 50,000 missing persons, with rescue operations still ongoing.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity without overt ideological framing. While it mentions political implications of natural disasters (e.g., Venezuela's recovery efforts), it does not take a clear partisan stance. The focus remains on scientific data and official reports,

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories