ON
← Back to feed
Racist violence erupts in Ceuta: organized groups attack migrants and Muslim neighbors
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative8/28/2026

Racist violence erupts in Ceuta: organized groups attack migrants and Muslim neighbors

The article describes a surge of racist violence in Ceuta, a Spanish autonomous city, directed against migrants and Muslim residents over the past two days. The violence includes physical attacks, burning containers, and groups using WhatsApp to organize efforts to cut off supplies and forcibly remove foreigners from neighborhoods. This follows the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants from Morocco, leading to protests under the banner of 'defending Ceuta' that turned into harassment and stone-throwing incidents involving Moroccan immigrants. Despite some voluntary returns facilitated by military and police forces, over 10,000 people remained in Ceuta, prompting continued tensions. Residents expressed fear and insecurity, claiming that crime was associated with all migrants. The government’s promise to return everyone without exception, despite legal limitations, fueled expectations of rapid repatriation, which did not materialize, leaving the situation unresolved.

The Spanish government and the city council of Ceuta have agreed on new spaces to accommodate migrants still remaining on the streets following a surge in arrivals last month. The agreement was reached during a meeting of the National Security Interest Committee held on Friday, according to sources from the Moncloa palace. The meeting, chaired by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, saw all members agree on the need to condemn violence uniformly to ensure peaceful coexistence after several days of unrest and attacks against migrants staying on the beach due to a lack of accommodation. On Thursday afternoon, for the second consecutive day, dozens of residents of Ceuta destroyed the belongings of people staying on the beach and set parts of the settlements on fire after attempting to prevent the Red Cross from distributing food. Similar incidents occurred on Wednesday, when hundreds of Ceutans headed to the area and tried to drive out the migrants sleeping outdoors by throwing their possessions into the water, forcing police intervention. Later that night, authorities reported the arrest of 12 individuals for throwing stones at a vehicle carrying four military personnel. Ceuta's mayor, Juan Jesús Vivas, opposed including the city’s sports centers in the list under threat of taking refuge there, “They will have to remove me from them”, and the government accepted removing them, so the full list of spaces available for sheltering migrants will be revised. Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska estimated on Friday in Congress that 5,000 people continue to remain in the autonomous city. This number includes the 1,500 unaccompanied minors identified and handed over to the city’s administration by the National Police, which is responsible for their care. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Childhood continues searching for solutions regarding female and teenage migrant children. Grande-Marlaska was one of the last officials this week to appear before Congress to account for the management of the humanitarian crisis, a day marked by episodes of violence in Ceuta. He described the situation as “extraordinary” and “undoubtedly worrying,” but emphasized that “violence is not in any case the solution.” PP deputy Javier Celaya, originally from Ceuta, joined the call for calm. “Anyone who thinks that violence helps Ceuta is completely mistaken. All it does is give wings to those who want to portray invaders as victims, when the real victims are the Ceutans,” he stated. Cuca Gamarra, vice-secretary of Institutional Renewal of the PP, said in an interview that “nobody justifies violence,” but added that the government should be aware that the tension to which citizens are subjected “is due to its inability and inefficiency.” Just 24 hours after 70,000 migrants crossed by swimming and through the border wall of El Tarajal into Ceuta on August 1, residents took to the streets to protest against far-right European Parliament member Alvise Pérez and neo-Nazi group Núcleo Nacional, who sought to capitalize politically on the humanitarian tragedy. Hundreds of Ceutans gathered in the Plaza de los Reyes with the intention of preventing these racist and xenophobic groups from breaking down coexistence. Alvise had to leave in a police van, and the same happened to ultra-right agitator Vito Quiles the following day, who had to flee from the central square amid the agitation his presence generated among locals. Almost a month later, however, the ultra-xenophobic and violent discourse has gained ground. Evidence of this can be found in marches toward the Trampolín Beach, where hundreds of Moroccans live in makeshift shelters built by themselves. On Tuesday, the first incidents occurred between protesters and police agents, but on Wednesday the demonstration turned into a hunt for migrants and ended up becoming a street battle in which riot police had to fully engage using rubber bullets, batons, and shields to prevent them from reaching the sandy area and attacking the young people in the improvised settlement. The most serious xenophobic incident occurred on Thursday afternoon, when agitators burned several migrant tents on Benítez Beach. All of this stems from a mantra circulating among large sectors of the population: “If the Government doesn’t do its job and expels them, we will.” Those who, day after day, seek conflict with foreigners under this excuse, or those who try to end the distribution of food by organizations such as the Red Cross (something they achieved on Thursday) or attack journalists, further degrade any moderate speech, which they consider “anti-Ceutan” or “anti-patriotic.” Most of the inhabitants of the city, both right-wing and left-wing, agree in blaming the central government and Pedro Sánchez for what they consider a disastrous management of the crisis, with thousands of people (5,000, said Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska in Congress) still wandering the streets 28 days after arriving by swimming. However, those who oppose violence and wish to assist the migrants begin to be careful about where and to whom they communicate these ideas. A kind of omertà has been imposed, out of fear of being labeled collaborators of those the extremists call “invaders.” Incitement to violent acts occurs through Instagram, TikTok, or X, as well as in mass WhatsApp groups. Sources from the National Police, which monitors social networks, rule out, however, that it is organized actions or manipulations by extreme right parties or groups from the city or the Peninsula. According to the officers, the dynamic is always the same. A certain publication causes hundreds of excited responses, and together they end up organizing attacks. It is in this way that the agents try to anticipate radical groups to avoid greater harm. However, it is not only that type of violence that threatens coexistence. There is another, less intense, that also poses a risk. For example, on Thursday, a text titled “List of establishments we propose to boycott in Ceuta” circulated through messaging apps. Each member added businesses “that sell or charge phones to immigrants.” Large stores such as Carrefour or Decathlon and franchises such as the bakeries Granier or 100 Montaditos appeared alongside them. But also, along with them, popular cafes, small shops and grocery stores, Chinese markets, restaurants, and even Passing half past eight on Wednesday evening, the protest against the government, called via social networks and WhatsApp groups due to the situation in which the massive arrival of migrants from Morocco at the end of July has plunged Ceuta, begins to lose meaning. The second spontaneous march, gathering hundreds of people, reaches the Plaza de los Reyes, headquarters of the Government Delegation, but the protest, after the repeated shouts of “Pedro Sánchez, son of a bitch,” the chants of “Ceuta is not for sale, Ceuta defends itself,” and the demands for the resignation of the head of the executive in the city, starts to fade. Except for a group of extremists who, at that moment, initiate the first collective outbreak of xenophobia that has been experienced in the autonomous city since July 31. After colliding with a small contingent of agents who prevented their descent towards the Paseo de la Marina through the Camoens Street, the leaders of this march descend through Millán Astray Street shouting “Yes, yes, yes, we go to Trampolín,” referring to the beach where the main makeshift camp is located, where hundreds of migrants are sheltered in huts built by themselves. Moments earlier, the first violent incident of the protest occurred when the riot police had to carry almost in volandas a team from TVE doing their work away from the march. After arriving at the Constitution Square, the chorus of demonstrators heads west, insulting and attacking any young person of Maghreb appearance who does not know how to speak Spanish. The first incident takes place in the central Africa Square. A man with red hair and beard wearing a purple shirt stops a teenager in shorts and flip-flops, pulling him by the shirt. “Are you Spanish? Show me your ID.” When he sees that the boy understands nothing of what they are saying, he kicks him hard in the back. The teenager mutters something in Arabic and runs away terrified. The aggression goes unnoticed by the police controlling, still somewhat relaxed, the protest. But many demonstrators start to withdraw after witnessing the scene. The aggressor justifies himself: “Forgive me, I can't take it anymore after twenty-something days and I couldn't control myself.” We are on the N-354, the road connecting Ceuta with the neighborhood of Benzú in the northwest of the city crossing the entire northern coast. After passing the royal walls, the bastion situated in the narrowest part of the population, several anti-riot vans begin to position themselves in front of the demonstration. Dozens of agents guide the march, which has already gone from several thousand people to a few hundred, while the police vehicles lead the way cutting traffic as they pass. During the journey, several attempts are made to attack young migrants who remain in the parks or exit supermarkets. The boys run at full speed towards the Trampolín when they start to be chased or insulted. Terrified. The agents encourage them to do so warning them of the danger they face. Halfway through the route, a group of regulars, the Ceutan soldiers wearing the characteristic red fez, applaud the extremists from the sidewalk. The group has already arrived at Benítez Beach, the one before the Trampolín, the one the foreigners have chosen to settle. While the agents contain the violent ones on the seaside promenade, dozens of youths run scared through the sand with their food bags. “Go back to your country, you dirty dog! Go back to your country, you bastard!” shouts a hooded man at a teenager appearing to be

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

4 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 558/27/2026
Racist violence erupts in Ceuta: organized groups attack migrants and Muslim neighbors

The article describes a surge of racist violence in Ceuta, a Spanish autonomous city, directed against migrants and Muslim residents over the past two days. The violence includes physical attacks, burning containers, and groups using WhatsApp to organize efforts to cut off supplies and forcibly remove foreigners from neighborhoods. This follows the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants from Morocco, leading to protests under the banner of 'defending Ceuta' that turned into harassment and stone-throwing incidents involving Moroccan immigrants. Despite some voluntary returns facilitated by military and police forces, over 10,000 people remained in Ceuta, prompting continued tensions. Residents expressed fear and insecurity, claiming that crime was associated with all migrants. The government’s promise to return everyone without exception, despite legal limitations, fueled expectations of rapid repatriation, which did not materialize, leaving the situation unresolved.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the migrant crisis through a narrative that emphasizes the threat posed by migrants to local communities, portraying them as a security risk and associating criminal behavior with all migrants. It highlights the actions of local residents and authorities in expelling migrants, and

Why factuality (95): This report includes detailed descriptions of violence, including injuries to residents, destruction of containers, and organized efforts to remove migrants from neighborhoods. The timeline matches other sources, and the mention of government actions and police interventions is consistent with other

Why objectivity (55): The article uses strong language such as 'virulent,' 'hostile,' and 'even proposing to go until death.' This framing emphasizes the severity of the violence and the threat posed by locals, which may not present a fully balanced view of the situation.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 868/28/2026
Government and Ceuta agree new spaces to house migrants left on the streets

The Spanish government and the local authorities in Ceuta have agreed on new locations to accommodate migrants who remain homeless in the city after July 30. During a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, all participants condemned violence against migrants, which has occurred over several days. On Thursday, residents destroyed belongings and burned shelters of migrants on the beach, while police intervened to stop attacks. The mayor of Ceuta, Juan Jesús Vivas, opposed using sports facilities for shelter, but the government agreed to remove them from consideration. Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska reported 5,000 people still in the city, plus 1,500 minors under police care. The situation remains tense, with calls for calm and criticism of violent actions.

Bias read (Center): While the issue involves political tensions between local residents and migrant populations, the article presents multiple perspectives including government action, local opposition, and political figures from different parties (PSOE and PP). There is no clear ideological slant in the framing of the

Why factuality (94): The article provides specific details such as the meeting between the government and Ceuta officials, the agreement on new spaces for migrants, the involvement of Pedro Sánchez, and the reported numbers of people remaining in the city. These facts align with the cross-source consensus, though the ex

Why objectivity (86): The article presents events in a largely neutral manner, reporting actions taken by both authorities and citizens. However, some phrases like 'destrozaron las pocas pertenencias' and 'intentaron echar a los migrantes' carry a degree of emotional language that could imply bias toward the victims, eve

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 608/28/2026
The ultra speech advances in Ceuta and threatens coexistence

The article reports on rising ultra-nationalist sentiment in Ceuta, Spain, following a large influx of migrants who arrived by sea on August 1st. In response, residents organized protests against far-right figures like Alvise Pérez and neo-Nazi groups seeking to exploit the situation politically. Ultra groups have since escalated tensions, leading to confrontations with police and attacks on migrant settlements. The narrative suggests a growing acceptance of violence among some locals, fueled by frustration over the government’s handling of the crisis. While most citizens blame the national government and Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for poor management, there is a noticeable shift toward self-censorship among those advocating non-violence due to fear of being labeled as collaborators with 'invaders'. Authorities note that while online platforms are used to spread inflammatory messages, these actions are not organized by political parties.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the rise of ultra-nationalist rhetoric as a legitimate response to government failure, portraying local residents' anger as justified. It highlights the influence of far-right figures and the normalization of xenophobic behavior, which aligns with right-wing narratives. The focus,

Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details such as dates, locations, and events like the burning of migrant shelters and police intervention. These align with the broader consensus found in other reports. However, some details may lack precise sourcing, and the focus on 'ultra' groups might overemphasize

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'racist,' 'xenophobic,' and 'violent' to describe certain groups, which introduces bias. It frames the situation as an attack on 'convivencia' by far-right elements, potentially overlooking the complexity of public sentiment.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758/28/2026
The Government and the PP agree to call for "calm" in Ceuta while Vox incites racist violence

The Spanish government and the People's Party (PP) have called for calm and the cessation of violence in Ceuta amid rising racial tensions. The situation has been marked by incidents including the burning of part of the Trampolín beach settlements, attacks on Muslim residents and journalists, and harassment of businesses serving migrants. Both the government and the PP have urged peaceful demonstrations, while the far-right party Vox has been accused of inciting racist violence. Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska described the situation as 'extraordinary' but emphasized that violence is not a solution. The government continues to manage the humanitarian crisis and legal procedures for returning undocumented migrants. The PP representative, Javier Celaya, warned against using violence to address the crisis.

Bias read (Center): While the article highlights the differing stances between mainstream parties (government and PP) and the far-right Vox, it presents both sides fairly. The framing remains balanced, emphasizing calls for calm from multiple political entities without overtly favoring one side over another. The focus,

Why factuality (85): The article includes direct quotes from EU officials and confirms the identification of Russian attempts to exploit the crisis, though lacking conclusive evidence. This aligns with the information provided by the European Union representative.

Why objectivity (75): The article is somewhat biased in its portrayal of Russia’s role, using phrases like 'intentos de Rusia de sacar partido', which may imply a negative judgment rather than presenting an objective analysis.

🎬 Videos from this story (1)

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories