When Janša praises the vandalism

A Slovenian company has been transferred free of charge to a political figure, raising concerns about legal integrity and corporate governance. The firm Progros, which was previously owned by Boris Mijić, has been handed over to Rok Snežič, who plans to transfer ownership to former Minister Luka Mesec within days. According to reports, this move is part of a strategic maneuver involving legal proceedings and financial obligations. Snežič, who has taken control of Progros, stated that he decided to acquire the business due to his former colleague Luka Mesec’s legal authority over his assets. This authority stems from a previous court ruling where Snežič lost against Mesec. However, since Snežič lacks the funds to cover legal costs, both he and his lawyer submitted a legal claim. The transfer of Progros to Snežič was formalized through a notarial agreement signed on Monday, July 20th. The company, still unregistered, has been renamed Klukec d.o.o., with its main activity listed as camel racing, a seemingly unrelated field. Snežič explained that this change was intended to ensure that Mesec would have a business with no competition in Slovenia, allowing him to succeed in entrepreneurship. He emphasized that he had not been the owner of a Slovenian company for the past 20 years and that this arrangement enables Mesec to take over the business shortly after. In a separate statement, Snežič claimed he was aware of the company's financial state, noting that Progros operates at a loss and runs with negative capital, effectively having used up its entire initial capital. The transfer document states that Mijić guarantees the business share is free of all burdens, though Snežič acknowledges the company's precarious financial situation. Luka Mesec responded to the announcement, calling the situation a “very poor joke” and criticizing the humor displayed by both Mijić and Snežič. He suggested that the scenario highlights a broader issue regarding the treatment of workers whose salaries remain unpaid despite promises made during the pandemic. Mesec implied that such actions could undermine public trust in democratic institutions. Political figures have expressed concern over the implications of the transfer. Borut Sajovic, leader of the Freedom Party, described the maneuver as a sad day for Slovenian democracy and the rule of law. He argued that the situation reflects a failure to uphold commitments made to voters and criticized the government for relying on deception rather than genuine policy. Sajovic warned that such practices risk eroding public confidence in democratic processes. Within the Social Democrats (SD), there has been criticism of the lack of accountability from key officials. Questions have been raised about the whereabouts of Minister for Labour Anže Logar, known for his stance against corruption, and other high-profile figures. Some members of the party suggest that these leaders should be held responsible for their roles in overseeing the company's financial obligations and ensuring fair treatment of employees. The case of Progros underscores ongoing issues related to corporate responsibility and transparency. The company, which has long been a subject of scrutiny, owes the state tens of thousands of euros in unpaid taxes and contributions. Employees have also remained unpaid, despite assurances given during the crisis. These circumstances have fueled public outrage and calls for greater oversight. As the situation unfolds, the focus will likely shift towards the legal and ethical implications of the transfer. Whether this action represents a legitimate business strategy or a politically motivated gesture remains under scrutiny. The outcome could influence public perception of leadership and the role of political figures in economic matters. For now, the immediate concern remains the well-being of affected workers and the stability of the company itself.