Kerum is defending himself, says he's not guilty, USKOK has released what you're charging him with.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

Former Split mayor Željko Kerum was arrested in Velika Luka, according to Slobodna Dalmacija. The arrest is linked to an investigation into the so-called 'Konoba Pršut' affair, which involves a restaurant and chapel owned by Kerum in Kaštela. The investigation reportedly includes several individuals close to Kerum. This follows months of investigations by Telegram regarding his business activities and property transactions, which allegedly involved illegal construction and falsified documents. Authorities have not yet released details of the criminal proceedings or official information.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on an arrest related to alleged illegal activities involving a former local politician. It cites multiple sources and presents the facts neutrally without overtly favoring any side. There is no clear indication of loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context that偏向

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source's information about Kerum's arrest, the charges against him, and the legal proceedings. It includes direct quotes from officials and maintains fidelity to the original document.

Why objectivity (90): The article is highly objective, presenting facts without personal opinion or emotional language. It provides balanced coverage of the situation and avoids taking sides.

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 852 days ago

The Croatian political party Centar has called on Split city mayor Tomislav Šut to initiate changes to the General Urban Planning Plan (GUP) of Split, revoke the concession on the Benama beach, and remove all members of Željko Kerum’s staff from municipal companies and oversight boards. Marijana Puljak, representing Centar, stated that the lack of progress on changing the GUP was attributed to Kerum’s influence, but now that Šut has declared Kerum 'no longer a political factor in Split,' there should be no further obstacles. Puljak emphasized that the process was already prepared by the previous administration and only requires the mayor’s signature. She also accused Kerum of holding the concession on Benama through his son-in-law and claimed that contractual obligations have been repeatedly violated. The party demands transparent appointments based on merit rather than political affiliation. Saborski representative Damir Barbir noted that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has yet to respond to two parliamentary questions regarding Bene and Kerum, despite legal deadlines. Zupanijska vijećnica Goran Rosandić argued that conditions for terminating the Benama concession have long been满足

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for change against Željko Kerum's influence as a necessary step for transparency and public interest, using strong language such as 'trgovačka koalicija' (trade coalition), implying corruption and undue influence. It emphasizes the need for merit-based appointments and指责s

Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed information about the legal case involving Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, including specific charges and procedural details. It matches the primary source document and presents facts without embellishment.

Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on reporting the legal proceedings without overtly taking sides. It avoids emotional language and sticks to factual descriptions.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 754 days ago

Former Split mayor and leader of the Croatian Civic Party (HGS), Željko Kerum, was arrested on Wednesday evening in Velika Luka on Korčula. The arrest, reported through unofficial channels close to the police, is linked to allegations involving the illegal construction of a pršut house in Kaštel Štafilić and the legalization of the structure. Kerum was at a concert commemorating the late Oliver Dragojević with family members when he was detained. His nephew Igor Sapunar and colleague Tomislav Režić were also arrested, while Andrija Polić remains at large. The Public Prosecutor’s Office (PNUSKOK) confirmed the arrests were carried out under the order of the State Prosecutors' Office (USKOK) as part of investigations into potential corruption offenses. Splitska gradska uprava postponed a public appearance by Mayor Tomislav Šuta, who stated that Kerum is not involved in municipal affairs and emphasized cooperation with the city council.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the arrest of a prominent political figure without overtly endorsing or criticizing any particular political stance. It reports on the actions of law enforcement and includes statements from both the mayor and Kerum's lawyer, maintaining a balanced tone

Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes Kerum's arrest, the locations involved, and the involvement of other individuals. It aligns with the primary source documents and provides relevant background information.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but focuses on the political implications of the arrest and the reactions of local officials, slightly leaning towards a critical perspective of Kerum.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 704 days ago

Former Split mayor Željko Kerum was arrested by police after a house search conducted by the State Security Service (USKOK) and the Public Prosecutor's Office (PNUSKOK). The arrest is linked to the 'Pršut Konoba' corruption case in Kastel, involving Kerum’s nephew Igor Sapunar, official Andrija Polić, and business associate Tomislav Režić. Kerum was taken away with his hands cuffed, and the operation took place at his home in Split. The Ministry of Spatial Planning stated it has not received any complaints regarding Kerum’s illegal construction in Kastel, noting that a key document from 2011 was not properly recorded in the planning system. Kerum is being represented by attorney Željko Gulišija, who previously defended him in past cases. Current Split mayor Tomislav Šuta said the arrest should not affect the coalition between HDZ and HGS in the City Council.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the arrest of a former politician without overtly criticizing or praising either side. It includes quotes from officials and mentions both the legal proceedings and the broader implications for local governance. While the subject involves corruption and

Why factuality (95): The article provides precise details matching the primary source, including the arrest, the involvement of other individuals, and the lawyer's comments. It accurately reflects the timeline and events described in the original document.

Why objectivity (70): The article is generally factual but uses emotive language like 'malverzacijama' and focuses on the political ramifications of the arrest, slightly leaning towards a critical perspective of Kerum.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 704 days ago

Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita i predsjednik Hrvatske građanske stranke, je uhićen u Veli Luci na Korčuli. Uhićen je zbog optužbi vezanih uz izgradnju konobe Pršut u Kaštel Štafiliću, gdje je objekt izgrađen bez prava i pitanja legalizacije. Kerum je prije odbijao sve optužbe, tvrdeći da je sve bilo zakonito. Među uhićenima su i Kerumovi blizaki, uključujući njegovog nećaka Igora Sapunara i bivšeg suradnika Andriju Polića. Kerum je prije dva tjedna javno izjavio da je izložen političkom progonu, navodeći da su različite institucije reagirale na naređenje novinara Telegrama. Uskok je potvrdio da provodi uhićenja i hitne dokazne radnje na naredbu PNUSKOK-a.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the arrest of Željko Kerum and includes quotes from both Kerum and Uskok, providing a balanced view of the situation without evident bias toward either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal aspects and statements made by involved各方.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes Kerum's arrest, the locations involved, and the involvement of other individuals. It aligns with the primary source documents and provides relevant background information.

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but shows slight bias by emphasizing the political implications of the arrest and the potential impact on the coalition government.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 604 days ago

Saborska zastupnica i predsjednica stranke Centar Marijana Puljak komentirala je uhićenje Željka Keruma, bivšeg gradonačelnika Splita i predsjednika Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), koje je sinoć u Vela Luci na Korčuli obavljeno zbog optužbi za kriminal i korupciju. Puljak kritikovala je suradnju između Keruma i splitskog gradonačelnika Tomislava Šute, kojeg smatra političkim pokroviteljem i knjigovođom. Osmjerila je pažnju na moguće posledice za građane Splita i opominula za potrebu za promjenama u vlasti. Šuta je odgovorio da Kerum nije član Gradskog vijeća i da ne sudjeluje u njegovom radu, dodajuci da će Kerum priču iznijeti u okviru zakonskog postupka.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a critique of corruption and criminal networks within the ruling party (HDZ), which is associated with the right-wing. The author uses strong language against the political figures involved, suggesting systemic issues and calling for civic action. The tone leans左翼

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Kerum's arrest, the locations involved, and the involvement of other individuals. It provides detailed information about the legal proceedings and aligns closely with the primary source documents.

Why objectivity (60): The article exhibits a clear bias against Kerum and his associates, using strong language and focusing on the negative aspects of the situation without providing balanced perspectives.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days ago

The article discusses the ongoing legal situation involving former mayor of Split Željko Kerum and his family members. Kerum, who is accused of involvement in a corruption case related to the illegal legalization of buildings by official Andrija Polić, is currently not available for interviews. His nephew Igor Sapunar has been placed under investigation detention, while Kerum himself remains free. The lawyer of Sapunar, Damir Primorac, expressed confusion over why Kerum and Polić are not detained, stating that this decision lies with the investigative authority USKOK. Primorac emphasized that Sapunar's role in the case is minimal compared to the main perpetrator and two accomplices. The article notes that the legal process continues with the investigation of four witnesses, after which Sapunar may be released.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the legal status of political figures without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports on the differing treatment of individuals involved in a corruption case, but does not take a clear stance on the legitimacy of their actions or the fairness of the司法.

Why factuality (90): This article closely follows the primary source document, detailing the process of uncovering the corruption through the journalist's investigation. It accurately describes the steps taken and the outcomes, providing a clear account of the events leading to Kerum’s arrest.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts as they were uncovered by the journalist. There is minimal editorializing, and the focus remains on the investigative process.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days ago

Former mayor of Split, Željko Kerum, will remain free after the USKOK (Croatian Public Prosecutor's Office) did not request pre-trial detention for him. The same decision was made regarding Antun Polić, a former official from Kaštel who is suspected of helping Kerum legally register illegally built structures in Kaštel Štafilić. Meanwhile, investigative judge ordered one month of pre-trial detention for Kerum's nephew, Igor Sapunarić, due to concerns about his influence on witnesses. According to Natalija Petković, deputy head of USKOK, the investigation is proceeding based on suspicions of abuse of position and encouraging others to do the same. Kerum’s lawyer stated that the decision by USKOK was expected and that Kerum denied any guilt during questioning. Investigators suspect that Polić helped legitimize construction on nearly two thousand square meters of land in Kaštel Štafilić, using outdated maps instead of current documentation. The case remains a major topic in Split, with citizens having differing opinions on whether it marks the end of Kerum’s political career.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the charges against Kerum and the defense's response without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both the prosecution and the defense, providing balanced perspectives on the ongoing legal proceedings. There is no clear ideological framing or biased word选择.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the charges against Kerum and his associates, citing the official statement from USKOK. It provides precise details about the alleged misconduct and legal procedures.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, focusing on factual reporting rather than opinion. It presents the information in a clear and balanced manner.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days ago

The article reports on an investigation initiated by the State Prosecutor's Office (USKOK) against former employee of the City of Kastel, Andrej Polić, Željko Kerum, and his grandson Igor Sapunar, regarding suspected illegal legalization of buildings within the former Konoba Pršut facility, now known as Hacijenda Amora. Polić was the first accused, Kerum the second, and Sapunar the third, facing charges of abuse of position and encouraging such abuse. The investigation alleges that they sought legal recognition of illegally built structures after June 2011, which violated legal requirements. It is claimed that Polić, as a senior specialist in spatial planning and construction, improperly issued a false report in August 2022 stating that illegal constructions existed on the 2011 orthophoto map, despite them not being visible on that map. Instead, he used a 2017 orthophoto map where the structures were clearly visible. All three individuals have denied the allegations and attempted to explain their actions during the investigation. USKOK has requested that only Sapunar face preventive detention, while Kerum and Polić remain free due to lack of evidence. The police have confirmed that

Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the investigation without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While the case involves local officials and potential corruption, the reporting remains objective, focusing on the procedural aspects of the investigation rather than taking a clear partisan

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed and accurate information about the investigation into Kerum, Sapunar, and Polić. It correctly describes the charges against them and the timeline of events. The information aligns closely with the primary source documents and additional secondary sources.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone throughout, presenting facts without editorializing or showing bias. It focuses on the legal aspects of the case rather than taking sides.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago

Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita, bio je uhvaćen nakon pretrage njegove kuće u Mejama, koja trajala dva sata. Istražitelji su ga odveli u službenom vozilu kroz garažni prostor, a njegovi bliski suradnici pomažu u organizaciji tog procesa. Akcija je bila dio istraživanja povezanog s aferom 'Konoba Pršut', koja uključuje sumnje u nezakonitu gradnju i legalizaciju objekata u Kaštel Štafiliću. Osim Keruma, ispitani su i neki ljudi iz njegove poslovne i obiteljske zajednice. Istražitelji su potvrdili da se provode hitne dokazne radnje zbog sumnji na korumpivna kaznena djela.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a police operation involving a former mayor linked to a corruption investigation. The framing is neutral, presenting facts without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from official sources and provides context about the investigation without editorializing or biased措

Why factuality (90): This article provides a detailed description of Kerum’s arrest and the subsequent search of his property, aligning closely with the primary source document. It includes specific details about the police procedures and the legal basis for the investigation.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone, focusing on the procedural aspects of the investigation and the legal framework involved. There is little to no editorializing.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago

An article reports on a new operation conducted by the Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK), which has arrested several individuals in the Split-Dalmacia and Dubrovnik-Neretva counties as part of an investigation into alleged corruption crimes. Among those detained is former Split mayor Željko Kerum, whose arrest is linked to the 'Pršut Bar' scandal. The article states that USKOK, acting under the authority of the Public Prosecutor's Office (PNUSKOK), will determine further proceedings after interrogating the suspects and will inform the public accordingly.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about arrests related to corruption investigations without overtly criticizing or praising any political figures. It focuses on procedural actions taken by law enforcement agencies rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject matter is of政

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and his associates, citing the official statement from USKOK. It provides precise details about the alleged misconduct and legal procedures.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, focusing on factual reporting rather than opinion. It presents the information in a clear and balanced manner.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 802 days ago

The political party Centar has called on Split mayor Tomislav Šuta to initiate changes to the city's General Urban Plan (GUP), revoke the concession for the beach of Bene, and dismiss Željko Kerum's employees from municipal companies and supervisory boards. Marijana Puljak stated that previous governments had prepared the process for changing the GUP, which only requires the mayor's signature. She argued that without Kerum's influence, there is no reason to delay the process, emphasizing the interest of citizens over construction lobbies. Puljak also demanded the cancellation of the Bene concession, claiming it belongs to Kerum's son-in-law and that contractual obligations have been violated for years. Additionally, she requested the removal of all Kerum's staff from director positions and supervisory boards, advocating for transparency and merit-based appointments. Saborski representative Damir Barbir criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for not responding to two parliamentary questions regarding Bene and investigations against Kerum, despite legal deadlines. Gorana Rosandić, a local council member of Centar, stated that conditions for unilaterally terminating the Bene lease

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism towards HDZ and Željko Kerum, highlighting demands for reforms and accountability, suggesting a left-leaning perspective.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on Šuta’s comments regarding Kerum’s arrest and the implications for the coalition. It references the primary source document and provides direct quotes from Šuta, maintaining factual consistency.

Why objectivity (80): While factual, the article subtly implies that Šuta is distancing himself from Kerum, which may suggest a political stance rather than pure neutrality.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

The mayor of Split, Tomislav Šuta, commented on the arrest of Zeljko Kerum and its implications for cooperation within the city council. He emphasized that Kerum's case dates back over ten years and that legal institutions are handling it appropriately. Šuta stated that Kerum is not a member of the City Council and did not participate in decision-making. He clarified that his communication is primarily with Igor Stanišić, the president of the City Council, and that he does not engage directly with Kerum due to his current legal status. Šuta called on opposition members to support projects beneficial to Split. The report also mentions that Marinko Biškić, a private entrepreneur, claims Kerum owes him 50,000 euros.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view by quoting both Šuta and the opposition's perspective regarding Kerum's influence. It avoids overtly biased language and provides context about the legal proceedings against Kerum. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the implications of Kerum's arrest for市政和

Why factuality (90): This article mirrors item 3, providing accurate quotes from Šuta and discussing the relationship between HDZ and HGS. It maintains alignment with the primary source and reports directly on Šuta’s statements.

Why objectivity (80): The tone suggests some level of political positioning, particularly when referencing the influence of HGS on the council members, though it remains relatively neutral.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

Tomislav Šuta, the mayor of Split, commented on the arrest of Željko Kerum and its implications for cooperation within the city council. He emphasized that Kerum's Croatian People's Party (HNS) has kept the HDZ in power and questioned whether the city administration would continue negotiations with someone currently in custody. Šuta stated that Kerum was not a member of the City Council nor involved in decision-making processes, and he communicates primarily with Igor Stanišić, the president of the City Council. Šuta called on opposition members to support projects beneficial to Split and highlighted ongoing infrastructure projects. The discussion also touched on allegations that Kerum exerts significant influence over his council members' decisions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Šuta's statements neutrally, quoting him directly and addressing both his position and the opposition's claims without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes and does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (90): The article provides a detailed account of Kerum’s previous arrest and his recent release, aligning with the primary source. It includes quotes from Kerum and contextualizes his legal history.

Why objectivity (80): The article has a somewhat critical tone toward Kerum, especially in describing his past legal issues, but remains focused on factual reporting.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita i političar, je uhićen u Veli Luci na Korčuli tokom koncerata u memoriju Olivera Dragojevića. Uhićen je zbog izgradnje konobe 'Pršut' u Kaštel Štafiliću bez prava i pitanja legalizacije objekta. Prethodno je bio u zatvoru krajem prosinca prošle godine za 15 dana zbog prometne nesreće koju je skrio u Splitu. Tada je, upravljajući automobilom bez vozačke dozvole, sudario se s drugim vozilom, uz manju materijalnu štetu, ali bez ozljeda. Dobio je kazne ukupno 1060 eura, uključujući 260 eura za izazivanje prometne nesreće i 800 eura za napuštanje mjesta događaja. Najteža kazna bila je 15 dana zatvora zbog vožnje bez dozvole.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the arrest and previous conviction of Željko Kerum, a prominent political figure, without apparent ideological framing. It includes direct quotes from Kerum and provides context about the legal proceedings against him. The tone remains neutral, focusing

Why factuality (90): This article accurately describes Kerum’s arrest, the legal case, and his previous incarceration. It aligns with the primary source and provides relevant background information.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is slightly negative toward Kerum, highlighting his legal troubles, but remains factual and objective overall.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

Tomislav Šuta, splitski gradonačelnik, objavi komentar o uhićenju Željka Keruma, predsjednika Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS). Šuta naglašava da Kerum nije član Gradskog vijeća ni sudjeluje u njegovoj radu, i podcrtava suradnju s predsjednikom Gradskog vijeća Igorom Stanišićem. Nije se izrazio o konkretnim detaljima slučaja, jer smatra da to spada pod nadležnost institucija, a Kerum će sam iznijeti svoju verziju u skladu s zakonom. Članak također informira čitatelje o potrebi registracije za komentare.

Bias read (Center): Članak pruža neutralnu analizu situacije bez jasno izražene političke pozicije. Šuta se drži neutralnog stava, opisuje činjenice i izbjegava izražavanje personalnih mišljenja, što pokazuje balansiranost prikaza.

Why factuality (90): The article reports on Šuta’s statement regarding continued cooperation with HGS, aligning with the primary source. It includes direct quotes and maintains factual integrity.

Why objectivity (80): The tone suggests a cautious optimism toward continuing collaboration with HGS, which may imply a political preference, though it remains largely neutral.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

Željko Kerum, bivši splitski gradonačelnik i poduzetnik, bio je uhićen u okviru akcije USKOK-a zbog sumnje u koruptivna kaznena djela. Akcija se provodi na području Splitsko-dalmatinske i Dubrovačko-neretvanske županije i uključuje više osoba. Uskok je potvrdio uhićenja putem službenog priopćenja i naveo da će nakon ispitivanja donijeti odluku o daljnjem postupanju. Bivši splitski vijećnik Bojan Ivošević komentirao je incident na Facebooku, naglašavajući važnost neovisnog novinarstva. HDZ-ov gradonačelnik Splita Tomislav Šuta izrazio je stalu suradnju sa strankom Keruma, čime je sugerirao da njegovo uhićenje neće utjecati na političku saradnju.

Bias read (Center): Vijesti su neutralno prikazane bez jasne stranih ili lokalne strane perspektive. Napominje se uhićenje kao zakonska mjera, a reakcije političara su izraženi bez evidentnog opterećenja riječi. Iako se radi o političkom subjektu, tekst ne pokazuje značajnu stransku manipulaciju.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the arrest of Željko Kerum and the involvement of USKOK, matching the primary source document. It provides relevant details about the investigation and the individuals involved.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the facts of the arrest and the ongoing investigation without overt bias.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago

The Croatian intelligence agency USKOK confirmed that it ordered the arrest of Željko Kerum, a businessman and former Split mayor, in connection with alleged corrupt criminal activities linked to the case of the Pršut villa in Kaštel Štafilić. The arrests and urgent investigative actions were conducted under USKOK’s orders in the Split-Dalmatia and Dubrovnik-Neretva counties as part of proceedings against several individuals suspected of corruption-related crimes. Kerum was arrested in the evening of Wednesday in Velika Luka on Korčula while attending a concert dedicated to Oliver Dragojević with family members. The arrest is connected to the Pršut villa case, where authorities are investigating the circumstances of illegal construction and the legality of the property. The investigation into the Pršut case was initiated after it was publicly announced in May, and Kerum has previously denied all allegations, claiming everything was done legally. The case was earlier opened by Telegram, and other individuals close to Kerum are reportedly involved.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the arrest of a prominent political figure and connects it to a corruption investigation. It does not overtly favor any political side, provides balanced reporting on the legal process, and avoids taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject is政

Why factuality (90): The article closely follows the facts presented in the primary source, including the involvement of USKOK, the nature of the investigation, and the individuals arrested. It accurately represents the timeline and legal procedures described.

Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely objective, presenting facts without editorializing. It quotes official statements and maintains a neutral stance throughout the report.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 754 days ago

Željko Kerum, nekadašnji gradonačelnik Splita i predsjednik Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), bio je uhićen u Veloj Luci na Korčuli. Uhićenje je povezano s slučajem konobe Pršut u Kaštel Štafiliću, gdje je Kerum bespravno izgradio objekt, a legalizacija tog objekta je upitna. Uhićeni su i njegov nećak Igor Sapunar, bivši stručni suradnik Andrija Polić, te bliski suradnik Tomislav Režić. Kerumov odvjetnik, Željko Gulišija, naveo je da će Kerum biti ispitan sutra na USKOK-u, a da će se obaviti pretraživanje u Kaštelima. Splitski gradonačelnik Tomislav Šuta i ministar Bačić komentirali su uhićenje, a Gulišija je naglasio da će Kerum branimo. Uhićenje nije utjecalo na splitsku koaliciju, prema Bačiću.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event of Kerum's arrest in a factual manner, providing information about the charges against him, the involvement of his family members and associates, and reactions from local officials. While the subject involves a prominent political figure and potential legal violations,

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports Kerum's arrest, the locations involved, and the names of those arrested. It cites the lawyer's statement about the investigation and aligns closely with the primary source documents.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but shows slight bias by emphasizing the political implications of the arrest and the potential impact on the coalition government.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 703 days ago

An investigation has been opened against Andrija Polić, a former employee of the City of Kaštela, Zeljko Kerum, a former Split mayor and leader of the Croatian Civic Party (HCS), and Kerum's nephew Igor Sapunar, regarding suspected illegal regularization of the Pršut restaurant. According to the police and the State Prosecutor's Office, Polić is accused of abuse of position, while Kerum and Sapunar face charges of inciting abuse of position. The investigation suggests that between October 2017 and January 2023, Polić, as a senior technical assistant for spatial planning and construction at the City of Kaštela, illegally facilitated Kerum and his company by issuing decisions to legalize buildings constructed unlawfully after June 2011. Polić allegedly provided false information during administrative procedures, using outdated maps to justify the legalization of structures that were not visible on the 2011 orthophoto map. He issued a decision in January 2023 to legalize five buildings totaling 1,965.65 square meters, which exceeded the allowed size and was built outside the urban area defined by the general urban plan of Kaštela.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of an ongoing investigation involving high-profile individuals and alleged misconduct in local governance. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains focused on the procedural aspects of the case and is

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and others, but includes some interpretative statements that may not be directly supported by the primary source.

Why objectivity (70): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the potential for an investigative detention, which might suggest a particular viewpoint.