'No basis in the constitution': SPD raises objections to Dobrindt's planned expropriation stop
German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt plans to introduce a federal investment protection law to block the socialization of approximately 160,000 private apartments in Berlin, a measure supported by the Left Party, Greens, and local SPD factions. Members of the federal SPD parliamentary group have raised significant legal concerns regarding this plan, arguing that there is no basis for such restrictions in the German Basic Law. Hakan Demir, an SPD member of the Legal and Interior Committee, stated that if Dobrindt intends to prevent socialization constitutionally, he should pursue a formal amendment to the Basic Law rather than relying on federal legislation. Demir warned that the proposed rules, which mandate compensation at market value and include last-resort provisions, contradict Article 15 of the Basic Law and existing Federal Constitutional Court jurisprudence on competing legislative powers. He predicted that state governments might challenge the law in Karlsruhe, leading to its potential invalidation. The conflict highlights tensions within the governing coalition, where the federal SPD supports the minister’s approach while the local SPD in Berlin favors housing co-.
Go to the primary sources (7)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Berlin Left Party lead candidate Elif Eralp inadvertently leaked internal notes regarding her fear of individuals associated with extremist Palestinian groups during a recent interview process. The leaked document revealed that Eralp and her husband were concerned about personal safety after being asked about Ibrahim Ibrahim, a figure linked to the United Palestinian National Committee (UPNC). Security authorities have classified the UPNC as part of the extremist spectrum due to connections with Hamas and the PFLP, both designated as terrorist organizations by the European Union. Eralp’s spokesperson confirmed that she has received threats and advised against naming specific individuals publicly due to security risks. The incident highlights tensions between political figures and groups involved in pro-Palestinian activism within Berlin.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation through a lens of national security and extremism, emphasizing the threat posed by 'extremist' and 'terrorist' affiliated groups. It uses strong terminology such as 'Israel-haters' in the headline and focuses on the 'fear' of the politician rather than exploring the
Why factuality (100): The text contains only the headline and URL, providing no factual claims to verify against the primary source document.
Why objectivity (100): No content is present to evaluate for bias or tone.
Berlin Left Party parliamentary group leader Elif Eralp responded to a report by the magazine 'Spiegel' regarding her security concerns involving a named individual. The publication claimed that Eralp had sent internal notes expressing fear of retaliation from Ibrahim Ibrahim, a known activist linked to the PFLP, which Germany classifies as a terrorist organization. Eralp stated she would not comment specifically on the article because the magazine published private, internal content. However, she reaffirmed her commitment to ensuring safety for all Berliners and vowed to act consistently against organized crime, violence, and terrorism. She emphasized that she would not be intimidated and noted that worrying about family safety is normal. Eralp is currently attempting to form a coalition government in Berlin with the Greens and the SPD after her party became the strongest force in recent state elections.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of a political controversy. It reports the allegations made by the 'Spiegel', provides context on the individual mentioned, and includes direct quotes from the politician defending her actions. The tone remains neutral, avoiding loaded language or taking sides
Why factuality (98): Highly accurate summary of the events. Correctly identifies the nature of the leak (internal annotations sent accidentally), the specific fear expressed, and Eralp's subsequent public response reaffirming her stance against violence. No contradictions found with the primary source.
Why objectivity (95): Maintains a strictly neutral, journalistic tone. Presents the facts of the leak, the reaction, and the politician's statement without injecting editorial opinion or loaded adjectives.
Der SpiegelIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 90
German Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has announced plans to introduce an Investment Protection Act intended to significantly restrict the socialization of rental housing, specifically targeting initiatives proposed by the Left Party in Berlin. The proposed legislation would require state governments to prove that all other measures, such as investment in new construction, have been exhausted before any expropriation can occur, and mandates immediate cash compensation based on market value assessments. In response, the Left Party criticized the plan as unconstitutional, arguing that the concept of socialization is already part of the Basic Law and cannot be overridden by federal restrictions. Meanwhile, the coalition parties in Berlin, including the Greens and SPD, continue to pursue their goal of socializing large private housing portfolios, estimating compensation costs at approximately 16 billion euros. Political reactions have been sharply divided, with the CDU/CSU faction supporting Dobrindt’s approach as necessary for a social market economy, while the Left accused the federal government of prioritizing corporate shareholders over tenants.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the debate through the lens of constitutional legitimacy and economic stability, heavily featuring quotes from the CSU minister and the CDU/CSU parliamentary group who describe the Left's proposals as 'arbitrary' and incompatible with the Basic Law. While it includes counter-views
Why factuality (95): Very high fidelity to the primary source. Correctly cites Dobrindt's quote from Bild, details the three-step plan (necessity proof, cash compensation at market value), and includes the immediate reaction from the Left Party (Caren Lay). No inaccuracies detected relative to the provided text.
Why objectivity (90): Maintains a neutral stance by juxtaposing the minister's strong rhetoric with the opposition's rebuttal. It presents the facts and the conflicting viewpoints without taking sides or using emotive language itself.
The German federal government, led by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, has outlined plans for a new Investment Protection Act intended to significantly restrict state-level efforts to socialize housing stock. The legislation aims to establish high legal hurdles for any future expropriation or socialization measures, requiring state governments to prove that all other housing investment options have been exhausted before such actions can proceed. Key provisions include mandatory immediate cash compensation based on market value determined by expert appraisal, rather than deferred payments or lower valuations. These federal guidelines directly conflict with current negotiations in Berlin, where the Left Party, SPD, and Greens are discussing a plan to socialize apartments owned by large corporations holding more than 10,000 units. Critics argue the federal law prioritizes corporate shareholders over tenants, while the government maintains that arbitrary socialization violates constitutional principles. The final decision on whether Berlin will pursue these local measures remains pending, with further discussions scheduled for an upcoming party conference.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the federal government's legislative initiative as a necessary defense against 'arbitrary leftist socialization fetishism,' using terminology that delegitimizes the opposing political movement. It highlights the financial burden of the proposed Berlin measure (16 billion euros) to
Why factuality (95): Faithfully reproduces the core facts from the primary source: the name of the law, the specific requirements (market value, cash payment, exhaustion of other means), and the quote from Dobrindt. Accurately attributes the initial report to Bild.
Why objectivity (90): Objective and straightforward. The headline uses 'high hurdles' which is descriptive of the policy impact rather than emotionally charged. The body text sticks to the facts and official statements without editorializing.
Leadership of the Green Party faction in the German Bundestag expressed shock over comments made by Elif Eralp, the Left Party candidate for Mayor of Berlin, regarding threats she faces. Irene Mihalic, the Greens' parliamentary managing director, stated that Eralp’s inability to clearly identify dangers posed by individuals like Ibrahim Ibrahim reveals the significant influence of extremists and organized crime structures in Berlin. The federal Green Party leadership has voiced growing concern over the Berlin branch’s efforts to form a coalition with the Left Party, citing allegations that some members have ties to criminal clans and antisemitic elements. Faction leader Katharina Dröge argued that parts of the Berlin Left Party appear unwilling or unable to distance themselves from these groups, suggesting that internal issues within the local branch are more profound than previously thought. In a separate legal development, the AfD party in Lower Saxony failed in its complaint against a court decision confirming its provisional classification as a target of surveillance by the state intelligence agency due to activities directed against the democratic constitutional order.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the political conflict through the lens of security and law enforcement, heavily relying on quotes from Green Party leaders who emphasize 'extremists,' 'organized crime,' and 'intimidation.' This framing aligns with center-right or conservative concerns regarding public safety and
Why factuality (95): Accurately reports the statements made by Green Party officials regarding the Spiegel report and the specific quotes from Irene Mihalic and Katharina Dröge. The characterization of Ibrahim Ibrahim aligns with the primary source description.
Why objectivity (60): While reporting direct quotes, the headline and lead focus exclusively on the 'shock' and 'extremist influence' narrative from the Greens, omitting Eralp's perspective or the broader political context of the coalition talks mentioned in the title. This creates a one-sided framing favoring the critic
Die WeltIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 90Objective 85
German Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has announced plans to introduce an 'Investment Protection Act' to hinder the socialization of large housing corporations by state governments. The legislation aims to counter proposals from a potential left-wing coalition in Berlin, which seeks to transfer approximately 160,000 apartments owned by five major real estate companies into state ownership. Dobrindt stated that arbitrary left-wing socialization efforts are incompatible with the constitution. The proposed law would require compensation at market value, determined by expert appraisal, paid immediately in cash, and mandate proof that all other housing investment measures have been exhausted before socialization can occur. Experts estimate that such nationalizations could cost between 50 and 60 billion euros in tax money, a sum Berlin reportedly cannot afford.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through the lens of the federal interior minister opposing local left-wing policies. It uses terminology like 'left-wing socialization fetish' (quoted from the minister but presented as part of the narrative) and emphasizes the financial burden ('unpayable', 'tax money')
Why factuality (90): Contains accurate details regarding the scale of the plan (160,000 apartments, 16 billion euros) and the specific measures proposed by Dobrindt. The inclusion of the 'Anti-Expropriation Law' nickname adds context found in other sources but remains factually grounded in the event.
Why objectivity (85): Generally neutral. It presents the government's action and the potential political consequences without overt bias. The phrasing 'brake' or 'prevent' describes the intended effect of the law rather than judging it morally.
The article investigates the background and perceived threat level of Ibrahim Ibrahim, a 70-year-old German citizen of Palestinian descent who has recently become a focal point of political debate in Berlin. The controversy stems from a leaked internal note by Left Party candidate Elif Eralp, who expressed fear regarding individuals like Ibrahim, prompting questions about his actual danger to public safety. While the Berlin state government and police have declined to comment on his specific risk profile, the piece details Ibrahim’s public support for Hamas and his praise for Yahya Sinwar, whom he described as a martyr hero. The text highlights his role as chairman of the Democratic Committee Palestine, which organizes events for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and notes his presence at various demonstrations, including an Amnesty International rally and a Left Party election celebration where he posed for photos with politicians. The author argues that while some view his rhetoric as antisemitic, others consider it a legitimate demand for a single-state solution, illustrating the polarized nature of the discourse surrounding pro-Palestinian activism in Germany.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy primarily through the lens of political polarization within the German left and the failure of the governing coalition to address security concerns transparently. It emphasizes the 'spark of truth' in tabloid reporting but focuses heavily on the reactions of left-w
Why factuality (88): Provides background on Ibrahim Ibrahim, citing his age, origin, and associations. Notes the lack of official police assessment. Some details (like specific quotes from Ibrahim) rely on secondary reporting mentioned in the text, which may vary in precision but generally aligns with the 'ground truth'
Why objectivity (65): Attempts a balanced profile but starts with a critique of 'tabloid' journalism. The tone is analytical but carries a skeptical edge regarding the danger posed by Ibrahim, asking 'how much danger really comes from him?' which implies the current coverage might be exaggerated.
Elif Eralp, the leading candidate for the Berlin mayoralty from the Left Party (Die Linke), faced political backlash after accidentally releasing internal communications related to a recent interview with Der Spiegel. The leaked documents revealed that Eralp expressed concern for her personal safety and refused to name specific pro-Palestinian activists during the interview preparation phase. She questioned whether to cancel the interview entirely and noted that Berlin police had advised her against commenting on certain individuals. The controversy stems from allegations of antisemitism within her party, specifically regarding the presence of Ibrahim Ibrahim, a PFLP-associated activist, at post-election celebrations. Although Eralp initially confirmed the connection to the Ibrahim incident in the final interview, the leaked drafts highlighted her reluctance to discuss these figures openly. Critics have used the incident to challenge her suitability for the role of mayor, arguing that she failed to transparently address security-related constraints.
Bias read (Center): The article maintains a neutral tone by presenting the facts of the leak, quoting both the leaked internal messages and the official interview responses. It contextualizes the security concerns by mentioning police advice and the classification of the mentioned activist’s group, while also including
Why factuality (0): The article is a brief news item about a political figure declining participation in negotiations, unrelated to the financial report.
Why objectivity (0): The article provides a concise update on political events, not addressing the financial topics in the primary source.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
The provided input consists solely of a headline indicating that the Left Party in Berlin is deciding on coalition negotiations regarding government formation. No article body was supplied, meaning there are no specific facts, quotes, or contextual details available to summarize beyond this single line of information.
Bias read (Center): Because the article text is missing entirely, it is impossible to assess the framing, word choice, or sourcing used by the publication. Without any content to analyze, the coverage cannot be judged as leaning left or right, resulting in a neutral classification despite the high political charge of a
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): The text contains no content to evaluate.
Die WeltIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
The provided text consists solely of a headline indicating that members of parliament in Berlin did not sign a declaration against antisemitism. It further suggests that the parliamentary group of the Left Party (Die Linke) is smaller than previously anticipated. No additional details, quotes, or contextual information are present in the supplied excerpt.
Bias read (Conservative): Although the input is limited to a headline, the phrasing 'smaller than thought' regarding the Left Party implies a narrative of decline or diminished influence for a left-wing political entity. This framing aligns with right-leaning perspectives that often emphasize the weakening of leftist parties
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): The text contains only a headline and no body content to evaluate for tone.
Süddeutsche ZeitungIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
The provided text consists solely of the headline and metadata for a Süddeutsche Zeitung article. It references Elif Eralp, a member of the Left Party (Die Linke) in Berlin, and her interview in the magazine 'Der Spiegel'. The headline poses the question of whether this interview constitutes a breach of trust ('Vertrauensbruch'). No further details, quotes, or contextual information regarding the content of the interview or the specific nature of the alleged breach are present in the supplied text.
Bias read (Center): The input text is limited to a headline and does not contain any body copy, arguments, or framing devices. While the subject matter involves a politician and a potential internal party conflict (which is politically charged), there is insufficient evidence in the provided snippet to determine if the
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): No content is present to evaluate for bias or tone.
Deutsche Welle (English)State / PublicCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
A controversy has erupted in Berlin regarding Elif Eralp, the lead candidate for the Left Party (Die Linke), after the news magazine Der Spiegel published internal notes from a private interview. In these remarks, Eralp expressed concerns for her family's safety if she were to publicly identify Ibrahim Ibrahim, a pro-Palestinian activist with alleged links to the PFLP, a group designated as a terrorist organization by the EU. She also mentioned receiving advice from Berlin police against naming individuals linked to organized crime, although reports suggest this advice pertained to a different case. Eralp has denied being intimidated and pledged to take firm action against terrorism and organized crime, while considering legal action against the magazine and filing a complaint with the Press Council. The incident occurs as the Left Party prepares to decide on forming a coalition government with the SPD and the Greens, potentially making Eralp Berlin's first female mayor of Turkish descent.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the controversy, detailing the specific allegations made by Der Spiegel, Eralp's defense and planned legal actions, and the broader political context of the upcoming coalition talks. It includes perspectives from both the politician and the media outlet,客观
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): No content is present to evaluate for bias or tone.
Junge FreiheitIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
Berlin AfD leader Kristin Brinker has called on the Greens and SPD to immediately halt coalition negotiations with The Left Party following a Spiegel report revealing internal communications by Left Party politician Elif Eralp. In these notes regarding a planned interview, Eralp expressed personal fear of individuals associated with extremist Palestinian circles close to her party. Brinker argued that this admission highlights severe security risks in the capital and reflects poorly on the state of The Left Party, citing broader issues with clan connections. AfD deputy group leader Sebastian Münzenmaier criticized Eralp’s fear as a consequence of her party’s previous dismissal of concerns regarding organized crime and migration. Additionally, BSW leader Fabio De Masi condemned the incident as a failure, noting that Eralp’s reluctance to name specific figures in interviews mirrors mafia codes of silence.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy through highly critical language directed at the Left Party, using terms like 'extremist,' 'clan connections,' and 'mafia code.' It relies exclusively on quotes from right-wing politicians (AfD, BSW) who characterize the situation as a security threat and a moral '
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): No content is present to evaluate for bias or tone.
CiceroIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 100
The article examines the political challenges facing Elif Eralp, a member of the Left Party (Die Linke), who intends to become Governing Mayor of Berlin. It highlights recent controversies involving allegations of antisemitism within her party, connections between party members and supporters of Hamas or terrorism, and ties to organized crime networks known as the 'Clan milieu.' The piece notes that while critics do not label Eralp herself as an antisemite, questions remain regarding her ability to maintain control over her party members. Eralp has publicly acknowledged fears concerning sympathizers for terrorism within her ranks. The author suggests these issues cast doubt on her suitability for the role of mayor.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the subject through a lens of security concerns and internal party discipline failures. By emphasizing 'terror sympathizers,' 'clan milieu' (organized crime), and questioning the candidate's ability to 'control' her people, the narrative aligns with right-leaning critiques that st
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (100): No content is present to evaluate for bias or tone.
Die WeltIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 95
The provided text consists solely of a headline stating that Elif Eralp intends to take legal action against the German news magazine 'Der Spiegel' and file a complaint with the Press Council. No further details, context, quotes, or background information regarding the specific allegations, the nature of the dispute, or the potential outcomes are included in the supplied excerpt.
Bias read (Center): The input text is limited to a single sentence headline announcing a legal and regulatory action by a private individual against a major media outlet. It lacks any narrative development, argumentation, or evaluative language that would indicate a specific political leaning. While the subject matter,
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (95): The tone is strictly journalistic and neutral. It reports the subject's decision without adding emotional adjectives, judgment, or biased framing.
Die ZeitIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Thuringia’s state prime minister Bodo Ramelow has accused the magazine Spiegel of engaging in 'vile journalism' regarding recent reports concerning his deputy, Elif Eralp. The controversy centers on allegations that Eralp faces threats from extremists, a claim supported by her apparent fear of such groups. Members of the Green Party have expressed understanding for Eralp’s concerns, validating the security risks she perceives. Ramelow’s strong criticism highlights a broader conflict between political figures and media outlets over the handling of sensitive personal information and security matters within the Thuringian government.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the narrative through the perspective of the Left-Wing Alliance (Die Linke) leader Bodo Ramelow and the Green Party, both of which are positioned on the left side of the political spectrum. By highlighting their reactions and validating the security concerns of the Green Party’s E
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): The text remains neutral by attributing specific viewpoints to the actors involved ('Ramelow accuses', 'Greens show understanding'). It does not take sides but simply reports the positions held by the politicians.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
The newly constituted Berlin House of Representatives was overshadowed by the revelation that Left Party mayoral candidate Elif Eralp refused to name Ibrahim Ibrahim, a known supporter of Hamas, in an internal note due to fears for her family's safety. This comment was accidentally sent to Spiegel magazine along with the final version of an interview she had authorized. While the formal proceedings of the first parliamentary session prevented immediate debate, opposition parties quickly capitalized on the incident. CDU Mayor Kai Wegner criticized politicians who fear naming problems clearly, while AfD leader Kristin Brinker called for ending Eralp's political ambitions. The article highlights that this controversy is compounded by documented connections between various branches of the Left Party and the United Palestinian National Committee, which the Berlin domestic intelligence agency identifies as a hub for supporters of terrorist organizations like Hamas.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the story through the lens of security threats and political accountability, using terms like 'terror sympathizer' and emphasizing the danger posed by refusing to name such individuals. It heavily features criticism from right-wing and center-right figures (CDU, AfD) and includes
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (85): Mostly objective, presenting multiple viewpoints (Eralp's fear, CDU criticism, AfD criticism). Slight bias exists in the selection of quotes that highlight the conflict, but it balances this by noting the procedural constraints of the parliamentary session.
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
Josef Schuster, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, expressed skepticism regarding the credibility of the Left Party (Linke) in combating antisemitism during interviews with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. He stated that he does not accept the party’s claimed distance from antisemitism, noting that specific members like Vanessa Emde and Ferat Kocak remain in office despite controversies involving their statements and associations. Schuster criticized the party’s internal declaration on the Middle East conflict as insufficient to establish clear facts against antisemitic tendencies within the group. The comments come amid coalition negotiations in Berlin between the Left, Greens, and SPD, where the Left faces pressure over these issues. Additionally, Left politician Bodo Ramelow accused the German-Israeli Society of one-sided criticism against his party in an open letter.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview by including direct quotes from the critic (Schuster), contextual background on the specific incidents involving individual politicians, and a counter-perspective from a Left Party member (Ramelow). It reports on the ongoing coalition negotiations neutrally,
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains largely journalistic and neutral, presenting Schuster's critical views as direct quotes and reported speech rather than adopting them as the outlet's own opinion. The framing focuses on the conflict between the Jewish Council and the political party without using emotionally charged
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt plans to introduce a federal investment protection law to block the socialization of approximately 160,000 private apartments in Berlin, a measure supported by the Left Party, Greens, and local SPD factions. Members of the federal SPD parliamentary group have raised significant legal concerns regarding this plan, arguing that there is no basis for such restrictions in the German Basic Law. Hakan Demir, an SPD member of the Legal and Interior Committee, stated that if Dobrindt intends to prevent socialization constitutionally, he should pursue a formal amendment to the Basic Law rather than relying on federal legislation. Demir warned that the proposed rules, which mandate compensation at market value and include last-resort provisions, contradict Article 15 of the Basic Law and existing Federal Constitutional Court jurisprudence on competing legislative powers. He predicted that state governments might challenge the law in Karlsruhe, leading to its potential invalidation. The conflict highlights tensions within the governing coalition, where the federal SPD supports the minister’s approach while the local SPD in Berlin favors housing co-.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the political dispute between the federal Interior Ministry and the federal SPD faction. It quotes specific criticisms from SPD politician Hakan Demir regarding constitutional validity and cites the government's stated intent to protect investors. The tone
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (85): The reporting is largely objective, focusing on the internal friction within the coalition partner (SPD). While it highlights the criticism against Dobrindt, it does so through direct quotes and specific legal arguments rather than adjectives or spin, maintaining a professional journalistic distance
Süddeutsche ZeitungIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 80
The provided text consists solely of a headline indicating that Elif Eralp expressed fear regarding terrorism sympathizers in Berlin. No further details, quotes, context, or specific incidents are included in the supplied excerpt. Consequently, the nature of her statement, the political implications, and any reactions from other parties cannot be determined from this fragment.
Bias read (Center): The input text is limited to a single headline without body content. While the subject matter (fear of terrorism sympathizers) is politically charged, there is insufficient information regarding word choice, sourcing, emphasis, or omitted context to determine if the framing leans left, right, or is
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (80): The phrasing 'expresses fear' attributes the emotion directly to the subject rather than the author, maintaining a relatively neutral stance, though the topic itself is inherently charged.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Germany
