CL🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative8 hr. ago

The revenge of Claudio Crespo: extending starts efforts to return to wear the uniform of Carabineros

Claudio Crespo, un exoficial de Carabineros chileno, ha sido absuelto definitivamente por la Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago de las acusaciones relacionadas con el incidente en el que disparó a un diputado, Gustavo Gatica, durante los disturbios del 8 de noviembre de 2019. La decisión confirma la sentencia del Tribunal Oral en lo Penal, que determinó que Crespo actuó en legítima defensa. A pesar de la posibilidad de recursos internacionales, el caso parece haber llegado a su fin. Crespo, quien fue dado de baja de la policía durante el proceso judicial, ahora busca limpiar su nombre y reintegrarse a Carabineros, ya que estaba cerca de ascender a coronel antes del incidente. Su abogado, Mauricio Bascur, indica que el primer paso para su reincorporación es esperar la notificación oficial del Tribunal Oral y luego presentar una solicitud formal al director general de Carabineros, Marcelo Araya.

Presidente José Antonio Kast expressed his support for the decision by the Court of Appeals confirming the acquittal of former police officer Claudio Crespo in the case involving injuries to opposition lawmaker Gustavo Gatica. The ruling, issued on Monday, August 4, 2026, reaffirmed that Crespo acted in self-defense during the chaotic protests that took place in November 2019. The incident occurred on November 8, 2019, when Gatica, then an undergraduate psychology student, suffered severe eye damage after being struck by rubber bullets fired by police officers during demonstrations. The protests were part of a broader social unrest known as el estallido social, which had erupted earlier that year. Crespo, who was serving as a police officer at the time, became a central figure in the legal proceedings following the shooting. Initially, prosecutors argued that Crespo was responsible for firing the rubber bullets that caused Gatica’s blindness. However, the Fourth Criminal Court in Santiago later ruled that Crespo had acted in legitimate defense due to the volatile nature of the protests. The court cited the Naín-Retamal Law, which outlines conditions under which individuals can claim self-defense, particularly in situations involving public disorder. Crespo's acquittal was further upheld by the Supreme Court of Santiago, which rejected a nullity appeal filed by the Metropolitan Prosecutor’s Office. This decision effectively closed the legal avenue for further prosecution against Crespo. The court determined that the charges against him did not hold sufficient grounds for conviction, reinforcing the initial verdict. In response to the ruling, Kast posted a message on his X account, stating that "justice has spoken in the case of Claudio Crespo and done so clearly and firmly." He emphasized that after years of accusations, Crespo had been cleared of all charges and that his actions were justified under the law. His comments reflect both personal endorsement and political alignment with the outcome of the trial. Gatica, now a member of Chile’s National Congress, has remained a vocal critic of the government’s handling of the protests and its relationship with law enforcement. His transformation from a victim of state violence to a parliamentary representative highlights the complex interplay between public dissent and institutional accountability in Chilean politics. The legal proceedings surrounding this case have drawn national attention, not only because of the severity of the injury sustained by Gatica but also due to the broader implications for how state actors are held accountable during times of civil unrest. The ruling underscores the tension between maintaining public order and protecting individual rights, especially in high-stakes confrontations between citizens and security forces. As the legal process concludes, the focus shifts toward the ongoing political ramifications of the case. Gatica’s continued advocacy for reform and Kast’s public endorsement of the judicial decision signal diverging paths in the country’s political landscape. The resolution of this case will likely remain a point of discussion in both legal and political circles for some time to come.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

Source documentX (formerly Twitter)

2 reports

La TerceraIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 85Objective 55yesterday

Kast values the decision of the Supreme Court that confirms the acquittal of Claudio Crespo for injuries to deputy Gustavo Gatica

Presidente José Antonio Kast celebró la decisión de la Corte Suprema de Santiago que confirmó la absolución del excarabinero Claudio Crespo por las lesiones causadas al diputado Gustavo Gatica durante el estallido social en 2019. La Fiscalía había inicialmente acusado a Crespo de haber disparado balines de goma que le provocaron la pérdida de la visión a Gatica, pero el Tribunal Oral en lo Penal concluyó que actúo en legítima defensa debido a la violencia del contexto. Kast destacó que la justicia 'habló fuerte y claro' y confirmó que Crespo fue exonerado de todos los cargos después de años de acusaciones.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Supreme Court's decision in favor of former police officer Claudio Crespo as a clear and strong judicial ruling, emphasizing the president's approval of this outcome. The narrative highlights the legitimacy of Crespo's actions under the law, particularly his claim of self-def

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the president's public statement regarding the court's decision, referencing the legal process and the nature of the charges. It includes direct quotes from the president and details the legal background of the case, aligning with the cross-source consensus on the cour

Why objectivity (55): While the article reports the president's comments objectively, it frames the situation in a way that supports the president's stance, using phrases like 'justicia ha hablado fuerte y claro' which implies approval of the court's decision. This suggests a political leaning towards supporting the acqu

La TerceraIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 608 hr. ago

The revenge of Claudio Crespo: extending starts efforts to return to wear the uniform of Carabineros

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal outcome of a case involving a police officer accused of shooting a politician during protests, which has significant implications for his career and reputation. While the legal process is detailed and balanced, there is no overt ideological slant toward either side. It

Why factuality (75): The article provides detailed information about the legal process involving Claudio Crespo, including the court's decision to uphold his acquittal and the context of the incident where he shot a blindfolded individual. It references the legal proceedings and quotes from the lawyer, but does not prov

Why objectivity (60): The article presents the outcome of the legal case and Crespo's intentions, but uses emotionally charged language such as 'revancha' (revenge) and emphasizes Crespo's desire to return to service, which may reflect a sympathetic perspective. There is some bias towards Crespo's position.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

The revenge of Claudio Crespo: extending starts efforts to return to wear the uniform of Carabineros

Go to the primary sources (1)

2 reports

How each side covered it

progressive

center

conservative

How each side covered it

Covered around the world

Covered around the world

Claims check

Claims check

Keep the news honest.

Related stories

Eugenio Tironi: The current opposition is groggy, because they don't know how to deal with Kast's hangover

Imputed for the fatal fall of a girl in Las Condes: Jorge Constanzo remains in prison and the Prosecutor's Office details his alcohol consumption

In Cerro Castillo: UDI deputies ask Kast not to lose focus due to agendas pushed by libertarians and republicans

Steinert on pause: Kast will wait for result of investigative commission to clear new appointment abroad

Arturo Squella, the defiant helmsman who once again annoys La Moneda

Gendarmerie thwarted attempt to release three inmates who were being transferred by bus to Puente Alto prison